Digital Twin in Practice: Emergent Insights from an Ethnographic-Action Research Study
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022
ABSTRACT
Based on an ethnographic action research study for a Digital Twin (DT) deployment on an automated highway maintenance project, this paper reports some of the stumbling blocks that practitioners face while deploying a DT in practice. At the outset, the scope of the case study was broadly defined in terms of digitalization and software development and deployment, which later pivoted toward the concept of Digital Twin during the collective reflection sessions between the project participants. Through an iterative learning cycle via discussions among the various project stakeholders, the case study led to uncovering the roadblocks in practice faced by the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) practitioners. This research finds that the practitioners are facing difficulty in (1) creating a shared understanding among the participants due to the lack of consensus on the Digital Twin concept, (2) adapting and investing in Digital Twin due to inability to exhaustively evaluate and select the appropriate technological capabilities in a Digital Twin, and (3) allocation of resources for Digital Twin development due to the inability to assess the impact of DT on the organizational conditions and processes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Azhar, S., I. Ahmad, and M. K. Sein. 2010. “Action Research as a Proactive Research Method for Construction Engineering and Management.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 136 (1): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000081.
Boschert, S., and R. Rosen. 2016. “Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect.” In Mechatronic Futures: Challenges and Solutions for Mechatronic Systems and Their Designers, edited by Peter Hehenberger and David Bradley, 59–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32156-1_5.
Feng, B., S. Kim, S. Lazarova-Molnar, Z. Zheng, T. Roeder, and R. Thiesing. 2020. “A Case Study of Digital Twin for Manufacturing Process Invoving Human Interaction.” 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-CASE-STUDY-OF-DIGITAL-TWIN-FOR-A-MANUFACTURING-Feng-Kim/50f3cd21e4860470e8d762fb591193868d9fe878.
Glaessgen, E., and D. Stargel. 2012. “The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles.” In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference<BR>20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference<BR>14th AIAA. Honolulu, Hawaii: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1818.
Grieves, M., and J. Vickers. 2017. “Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems.” In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems: New Findings and Approaches, edited by Franz-Josef Kahlen, Shannon Flumerfelt, and Anabela Alves, 85–113. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4.
Hampson, K. D., and C. B. Tatum. 1993. “Technology Strategy for Construction Automation.” Automation and Robotics in Construction X, 125–33.
Hartmann, T., M. Fischer, and J. Haymaker. 2009. “Implementing Information Systems with Project Teams Using Ethnographic–Action Research.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 23 (1): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2008.06.006.
Khajavi, S. H., N. H. Motlagh, A. Jaribion, L. C. Werner, and J. Holmström. 2019. “Digital Twin: Vision, Benefits, Boundaries, and Creation for Buildings.” IEEE Access 7: 147406–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946515.
Love, P. E. D., and J. Matthews. 2019. “The ‘How’ of Benefits Management for Digital Technology: From Engineering to Asset Management.” Automation in Construction 107 (November): 102930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102930.
Madni, A. M., C. C. Madni, and S. D. Lucero. 2019. “Leveraging Digital Twin Technology in Model-Based Systems Engineering.” Systems 7 (1): 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010007.
Mahalingam, A., A. K. Yadav, and J. Varaprasad. 2015. “Investigating the Role of Lean Practices in Enabling BIM Adoption: Evidence from Two Indian Cases.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 141 (7): 05015006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000982.
Opoku, D.-G. J., S. Perera, R. Osei-Kyei, and M. Rashidi. 2021. “Digital Twin Application in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review.” Journal of Building Engineering 40 (August): 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726.
Oswald, D., and A. Dainty. 2020. “Ethnographic Research in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 146 (10): 03120003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001917.
Rosen, R., G. von Wichert, G. Lo, and K. D. Bettenhausen. 2015. “About The Importance of Autonomy and Digital Twins for the Future of Manufacturing.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (3): 567–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141.
Schleich, B., N. Anwer, L. Mathieu, and S. Wartzack. 2017. “Shaping the Digital Twin for Design and Production Engineering.” CIRP Annals 66 (1): 141–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.040.
Shao, G., and M. Helu. 2020. “Framework for a Digital Twin in Manufacturing: Scope and Requirements.” Manufacturing Letters 24 (April): 105–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.04.004.
Söderberg, R., K. Wärmefjord, J. S. Carlson, and L. Lindkvist. 2017. “Toward a Digital Twin for Real-Time Geometry Assurance in Individualized Production.” CIRP Annals 66 (1): 137–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.038.
Venkatraman, N. 1994. “IT-Enabled Business Transformation: From Automation to Business Scope Redefinition.” MIT Sloan Management Review. 1994. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/itenabled-business-transformation-from-automation-to-business-scope-redefinition/.
Wright, L., and S. Davidson. 2020. “How to Tell the Difference between a Model and a Digital Twin.” Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences 7 (1): 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-020-00147-4.
Zanen, P. P. A., T. Hartmann, S. H. S. Al-Jibouri, and H. W. N. Heijmans. 2013. “Using 4D CAD to Visualize the Impacts of Highway Construction on the Public.” Automation in Construction 32 (July): 136–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.01.016.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 1253 - 1260
History
Published online: Mar 7, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.