Chapter
Mar 7, 2022

Adaptation of a Contractor’s Risk Behavior in a Competitive Bidding Environment

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022

ABSTRACT

In the construction sector, contractors deal with many uncertainties during their projects such as cost overruns, schedule delays, and safety issues. To overcome such complications, contractors pursue diverse risk management approaches which reflect their risk behavior and attitude toward expected risks as well as bidding decisions. Risk attitude is influenced by various factors that include individual characteristics, demographics, social and cultural influences. This paper conducted a thorough literature review to identify the different internal and external factors that influence contractors’ risk behavior adaptation to varying bidding situations. It also ranked the said factors by order of importance based on a survey administered to construction professionals. Survey findings showed that the most influential factors are the completeness of project information and the contractor’s need for work. Then, the paper presented a bidding framework that aims to mimic the competitive construction bidding process and to study the long-term impact of a contractor’s adaptive risk attitude on his financial performance and growth in the market.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Ahmad, I., and Minkarah, I. (1988). “Questionnaire survey on bidding in construction”. Journal of Management in Engineering, 4(3), 229–243.
Allen, D., Renn, R., Moffitt, K., and Vardaman, J. (2007). “Risky business: the role of risk in voluntary turnover decisions”. Human Resource Management Review, 17(3), 305–318.
Asgari, S., Awwad, R., Kandil, A., and Odeh, I. (2016). “Impact of considering need for work and risk on performance of construction contractors: An agent-based approach”. Automation in Construction, 65, 9–20.
Awwad, R., Asgari, S., and Kandil, A. (2014). “Developing a virtual laboratory for construction bidding environment using agent-based modeling”. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(6), 04014105.
Bageis, A. S., and Fortune, C. (2009). “Factors affecting the bid/no bid decision in the Saudi Arabian construction contractors.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 27(1), 53–71.
Bamgbade, J., Kamaruddeen, A., and Nawi, M. (2017). “Malaysian construction firms’ social sustainability via organizational innovativeness and government support: the mediating role of market culture”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154, 114–124.
Barney, J. B. (1986). “Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?”. Academy of management review, 11(3), 656–665.
Boughton, P. D. (1987). “The competitive bidding process: Beyond probability models”. Industrial Marketing Management, 16(2), 87–94.
Boussabaine, A. H. (1996). “The use of artificial neural networks in construction management: A review”. Construction Management and Economics, 14(5), 427–436.
Bowman, E. H. (1980). “A risk/return paradox for strategic management”. Sloan Management Review, 17–31.
Carr, R. (1982). “General bidding model”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 108(4), 639–650.
Carr, R. I. (1983). “Impact of number of bidders on competition”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 109(1), 61–73.
Chan, E., and Maria, C. (2007). “Building contractors behavioural pattern in pricing weather risks under Different Project Values and Durations”. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), 615–626.
Chao, L. (2007). “Fuzzy logic model for determining minimum bid markup”. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22(6), 449–460.
Chauvin, B., Hermand, D., and Mullet, E. (2007). “Risk perception and personality facets”. Risk Analysis, 27(1), 171–185.
Chen, Y. Q., Zhang, S. J., Liu, L. S., and Hu, J. (2015). Risk perception and propensity in bid/no-bid decision-making of construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(1), 2–20.
Cheng, M., Hsiang, C., Tsai, H., and Do, H. (2011). “Bidding decision making for construction company using multi criteria prospect model”. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 17(3), 424–436.
Chua, D. K., and Li, D. (2000). “Key factors in bid reasoning model”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(5), 349–357.
De-Neufville, R., and King, D. (1991). “Risk and Need for Work Premiums in Contractor Bidding”. Risk and need-for-work premiums in contractor bidding, 117(4), 659–673.
Dozzi, S. P., AbouRizk, A. M., and Schroeder, S. L. (1996). “Utility theory model for bid markup decisions”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(2), 119–124.
Friedman, L. (1956). “A competitive-bidding strategy”. Operations Research, 4(1), 104–112.
Gates, M. (1967). “Bidding strategies and probabilities”. Journal of Construction Division, 93, 75–103.
Hegazy, T., and Moselhi, O. (1995). “Elements of cost estimation: A survey in Canada and the United States”. Cost Engineering, 37(5), 27–33.
Hillson, D., and Murray-Webster, R. (2007). Understanding and managing risk attitude. Burlington, USA: Gower.
Howard, R. A. 1977. Risk preference: Readings in decision analysis, 952 edited by Howard and Matheson. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research 953 Institute.
Kim, H., and Reinschmidt, K. F. (2011a). “Effects of contractors’ risk attitude on competition in construction”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(4), 275–283.
Kim, H., and Reinschmidt, K. F. (2011b). “Association of risk attitude with market diversification in the construction business”. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(2), 66–74.
Laryea, S., and Hughes, W. (2011). “Risk and Price in the Bidding Process of Contractors”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(4), 248–258.
Li, H., Shen, L. Y., and Love, P. E. (1999). “ANN-based mark-up estimation system with self-explanatory capacities”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(3), 185–189.
Li, G., Zhang, G., Chen, C., and Martek, I. (2020). Empirical bid or no bid decision process in international construction projects: Structural equation modeling framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), 4020050.
Liu, J., Cui, Z., Yang, X., and Skitmore, M. (2018). “Experimental investigation of the impact of risk preference on construction bid markups”. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(3).
Liu, M., and Ling, Y. (2003). “Using fuzzy neural network approach to estimate contractors’ markup”. Building and Environment, 38(11), 1303–1308.
Marzouk, M., and Mohamed, E. (2018). Modeling bid/no bid decisions using fuzzy fault tree. Construction Innovation, 18(1), 90–108.
Mochtar, K., and Arditi, D. (2001). “Pricing strategy in the US construction industry”. Construction Management and Economics, 19(4), 405–415.
Moselhi, O., Hegazy, T., and Fazio, P. (1993). “DBID: Analogy based DSS for bidding in construction”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(3), 466–470.
Oo, B., Drew, D. S., and Lo, H. (2008). “Heterogeneous approach to modeling contractors’ decision-to-bid strategies”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(10), 766–775.
Ringler, P., Keles, D., and Fichtner, W. (2016). “Agent-based modelling and simulation of smart electricity grids and markets – A literature review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 205–215.
Shokri-Ghasabeh, M., and Chileshe, N. (2016). “Critical factors influencing the bid/no bid decision in the australian construction industry”. Construction Innovation, 16(2), 127–157.
Smith, G. R., and Bohn, M. C. (1999). “Small to medium contractor contingency and assumption of risk”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(2), 101–108.
Sonmez, R., and Sozgen, B. (2017). A support vector machine method for bid/no bid decision making. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(5), 641–649.
Taofeeq, D. M., Adeleke, A. Q., and Lee, C. (2019).” Individual factors influencing contractors’ risk attitudes among Malaysian construction industries: the moderating role of government policy”. International Journal of Construction Management, 1–20.
Wang, J., and Yuan, H. (2011). “Factors affecting contractors’ risk attitudes in construction projects: Case study from China”. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 209–219.
Wang, W., Dzeng, R., and Lu, Y. (2007). “Integration of Simulation-Based Cost Model and Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model for Bid Price Decisions”. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22(3), 223–235.
Yamane, T. 1967. Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.
Zou, P., Zhang, G., and Wang, J. (2007). “Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China”. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), 601–614.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2022
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 1223 - 1232

History

Published online: Mar 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rita Awwad, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
1Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Lebanese American Univ., New York, NY. Email: [email protected]
Wiam El Irani [email protected]
2Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Lebanese American Univ., New York, NY. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$288.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$288.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share