Facilitating Smart Contract in Project Scheduling under Uncertainty—A Choquet Integral Approach
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022
ABSTRACT
The expected benefit of smart contract (SC) relies heavily on its completeness and adaptability. Previous studies have discussed the application of SC on construction at the conceptual level, while a method to reflect human preferences as action items to enforce schedule executability is not available for construction managers. The objectives of this research are (1) to develop a method to generalize human preference as scheduling practices, and (2) to utilize SC technology to facilitate the execution of the practice. Performance data of different labor investment and production rate arrangements were obtained through a simulation of a high-rise construction project operation. This research used a Choquet Integral-based approach to aggregate owners’ preferences on workspace overlap, manpower utilization, and project duration to customize the optimum scenarios for resource utilization. Such decision rules were bundled with payment transactions and then embedded as agreements in an SC-based scheduling platform. The SC platform developed can provide the optimized resource utilization solution under different preferences, meanwhile timely disseminate schedule information and facilitate payment transactions. The research findings will assist project managers to quickly react to unexpected changes in management preferences in manpower, space, or schedule by developing adaptable resource utilization solutions. It will also help them to enforce the execution of the plan timely using the SC scheduling platform.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Altay, H., and Motawa, I. 2020. An investigation on the applicability of smart contracts in the construction industry. ARCOM Doctoral Workshop, (March 25, 2020), 12–16.
Assaad, R., and El-Adaway, I. H. 2021. Guidelines for Responding to COVID-19 Pandemic: Best Practices, Impacts, and Future Research Directions. J. Manage. Eng., 37 (3), 06021001.
Christidis, K., and Devetsikiotis, M. 2016. Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303.
Dakhli, Z., Lafhaj, Z., and Mossman, A. 2019. The potential of blockchain in building construction. Buildings, 9 (4).
Frandson, A. G., Seppänen, O., and Tommelein, I. D. (2015). “Comparison between location based management and takt time planning.” Proc. 23th Annual Conf. of the Int’l. Group for Lean Constr. (IGLC 23), Perth, Australia, 3–12.
Hamledari, H., and Fischer, M. 2021. Role of Blockchain-Enabled Smart Contracts in Automating Construction Progress Payments. J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr., 13 (1), 04520038.
He, C., Liu, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Hsiang, S. M., Chen, G., and Chen, J. 2021. What Does Social Distancing Mean to Construction Scheduling? - Visualize and Optimize Space-Time-Manpower Tradeoff. Submitted to: J. Manage. Eng.
Li, J., Greenwood, D., and Kassem, M. 2019. Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases. Autom. Constr., 102 (March), 288–307.
Linnik, M., Berghede, K., and Ballard, G. (2013). “An experiment in takt time planning applied to non-repetitive work.” Proc. 21th Annual Conf. of the Int’l. Group for Lean Constr. (IGLC 21), Fortaleza, Brazil, 609–618.
Nakamoto, S. 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System [online]. Available from: https://git.dhimmel.com/bitcoin-whitepaper/v/a5f36b332cb6a5fa9e701886f376ac1ac2946d07/ [Accessed 7 Jan 2021].
Pasrija, V., Kumar, S., and Srivastava, P. R. 2012. Assessment of Software Quality: Choquet Integral Approach. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Commun., 6, 153–162.
Sugeno, M. 1974. Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications. Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Szabo, N. 1994. Smart Contracts [online]. Available from: https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart.contracts.html [Accessed 7 Jan 2021].
Woo, J., Asutosh, A. T., Li, J., Ryor, W. D., Kibert, C. J., and Shojaei, A. 2020. Blockchain: A Theoretical Framework for Better Application of Carbon Credit Acquisition to the Building Sector. In: Construction Research Congress 2020. Tempe, Arizona, 885–894.
Xu, X., Xie, J., and Chen, S. 2020. Multi-attribute decision making based on the choquet integral operator with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. Springer Singapore.
Zhao, X., Chen, L., Pan, W., and Lu, Q. 2017. AHP-ANP–Fuzzy Integral Integrated Network for Evaluating Performance of Innovative Business Models for Sustainable Building. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 143 (8), 4017054.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 7, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.