BIM Integration and Value Engineering: Design for Assembly, Optimization, and Real Time Cost Visualization in Off-Site Construction
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022
ABSTRACT
Building Information Modeling (BIM) has revolutionized the way we plan, design, execute, and monitor the built environment. Various stakeholders in different compartments are brought under one umbrella to function as an integrated team in BIM concept. The construction industry is gradually evolving to a manufacturing and product delivery process by collaborating in a multi-disciplinary environment where design for manufacturability and assembly takes precedence. Off-site construction methods like pre-engineered, pre-cast, and modular technology are being adopted in many large span and high-rise building projects due to its cost effectiveness in large volume. Optimization of targeted values viz manufacturability, assembly, schedule, lifecycle cost, and sustainability becomes critical to ensure a smooth execution and maximum value generation of the project. Design for a specific target value according to the utility has been an evolutionary process. The objective of the study is to investigate the impact of BIM in managing and minimizing change orders by design optimization through visualization during the planning process in off-site construction. The study also examines the various factors influencing the smooth interface from design to construction and critically examine the bottlenecks in achieving a near perfect transformation to manufactured construction. Design for Assembly (DfA) approach gives the stakeholders more rationale inputs for monitoring and decision making in a more controlled environment of off-site construction. Design optimization in off-site construction is achieved as a byproduct of the DfA process when real time cost visualization is integrated into BIM framework. Collaboration of disciplines and optimization of resources can make the design-construction interface hitch free to ensure a near perfect BIM execution.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Ballard, G. (2008). The lean project delivery system: An update. Lean Construction Journal, 2008, pp.1–19.
Chen, Q., Reichard, G., and Beliveau, Y. (2007) 'Interface Management - A Facilitator of Lean Construction and Agile Project Management', 15th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. East Lansing, Michi-gan, USA, pp. 57–66.
Forbes, L. H., and Ahmed, S. M. (2010), Modern Construction: Lean Project Delivery and Integrated Practices, CRC Press.
Jergeas, G. F., Williamson, E., Skulmoski, G. J., and Thomas, J. (2000) ‘Stakeholder Management on Construction Projects’, AACE International Transaction, pp. P12.1–P12.6.
Miles, L. D. (1972), Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Nain, A. (2009), Valuation Principles and Procedures, volume 1. Dew Drops Education Pvt Ltd, Kolkata.
Nanyam, V. N., Sawhney, R. B., and Vikram, H. (2017) ‘Implementation of Precast Technology in India; Opportunities and Challenges,’ Creative Construction Conference 2017, 19-22 June 2017, Croatia.
Pinto, J. K., and Slevin, P.(1988) ‘Critical Success Factors across the Project Life Cycle’,Project Management Journal, 19:3, pp. 59–66.
Ronie, N. (2005) ‘Automated project performance control of construction projects’, Automation in Construction Journal, pp.467–476.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 7, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.