Exploring the Use of Mobile Technologies for Highway Construction Inspection
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022
ABSTRACT
Utilization of technology has been proven as an efficient approach to construction inspection. Although a wide variety of technologies are available to support construction inspection, there is a lack of understanding of how mobile technologies can be effectively used for construction inspection. This study aimed at exploring the current practices of using mobile technologies to inspect highway construction projects. The main mobile technologies investigated in this study include tablet computers/smart phones, handheld data collectors, automated machine guidance, and virtual reality/augmented reality. A national survey was conducted to evaluate the current practices and identify benefits and challenges of using mobile technologies for highway inspections. Based on the responses from 42 state Departments of Transportation (DOTs), the result of this study showed that tablet computers/smart phones are the most common technologies used for highway construction inspection. DOTs typically use mobile technologies for the following activities: monitoring construction progress, earthwork inspection and quantities, and documentation of work completed for payment. The main barriers for adopting mobile technologies for construction inspection are the lack of reliable internet connection in remote locations; lack of training; knowledge and skills; and cost issues. This study contributes to the body-of-knowledge and the construction industry by exploring the current practices and identifying challenges in implementing mobile technologies for highway construction inspection.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Asbahan, R. E., and DiGirolamo, P. 2012. Value of tablet computers in transportation construction inspection: Ongoing case study of projects in Pennsylvania. Transportation research record, 2268(1), pp.12–17.
Behzadan, A. H., Dong, S., and Kamat, V. R. 2015. Augmented reality visualization: A review of civil infrastructure system applications. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(2), pp.252–267.
Beainy, F., Commuri, S., and Zaman, M. 2012. Quality assurance of hot mix asphalt pavements using the intelligent asphalt compaction analyzer. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(2), pp.178–187.
Caltrans. 2013. Guidelines for Implementing Automated Machine Guidance. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/construc/amg/.
Chen, Z., Chen, J., Shen, F., and Lee, Y. 2015. Collaborative mobile-cloud computing for civil infrastructure condition inspection. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(5), p.04014066.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2013. Automated Machine Guidance with Use of 3D Models,. Washington, D.C.
Georgel, P., Schroeder, P., Benhimane, S., and Hinterstoisser, S. 2007. An industrial augmented reality solution for discrepancy check. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Nara, Japan, November 13-16.
Shin, D., and Dunston, P. 2010. Technology development needs for advancing augmented reality-based inspection. Automation in Construction, 19(2), pp.169–182.
Hannon, J. 2007. Emerging Technologies for Construction Delivery, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.
Jáuregui, D. V., White, K. R., Pate, J. W., and Woodward, C. B. 2005. Documentation of bridge inspection projects using virtual reality approach. Journal of infrastructure systems, 11(3), pp.172–179.
Pistorius, C. 2017. The impact of emerging technologies on the construction industry Innovation Insight, 4, pp.1–70.
Rankohi, S., and Waugh, L. 2013. Review and analysis of augmented reality literature for construction industry. Visualization in Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 9.
Shin, D., and Dunston, P. 2008. Identification of application areas for augmented reality in industrial construction based on technology suitability. Journal of Automation in Construction. Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 882.894.
Sillars, D. N., Scholz, T., and Hallowell, M. (2010). Analysis of QA procedures at the Oregon Department of Transportation. Oregon State University. Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering. Available: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Programs/ResearchDocuments/QA-QC.pdf.
Silverio-Fernandez, M. A., Renukappa, S., and Suresh, S. 2019. Evaluating critical success factors for implementing smart devices in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
Snow, M., White, G., Katara, S., Willoughby, K., and Garcia, R. 2013. Project inspection using mobile technology-phase I: an investigation into existing business processes and areas for improvement using mobile technology. Washington (State). Dept. of Transportation. Research Office.
Torres, H. N., Ruiz, J. M., Chang, G. K., Anderson, J. L., and Garber, S. I. 2018. Automation in highway construction part I: Implementation challenges at state transportation departments and success stories. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure Research and Development. Retrieved from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/16030/16030.pdf.
Valdes, D., and Perdomo, J. L. 2013. Using Mobile Computers to Automate the Inspection Process for Highway Construction Projects. Available: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/29454.
White, D., Jahren, C., Vennapusa, P., Westort, C., Alhasan, A., Turkan, Y., Guo, F., Hannon, J., Dubree, A., and Sulbaran, T. 2018. Use of Automated Machine Guidance within the Transportation Industry,. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.
Yamaura, J., and Muench, S. T. 2018. Assessing the impacts of mobile technology on public transportation project inspection. Automation in Construction, 96, pp.55–64.
Zhang, H., Chi, S., Yang, J., Nepal, M., and Moon, S. 2017. Development of a safety inspection framework on construction sites using mobile computing. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(3), p.04016048.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 689 - 697
History
Published online: Mar 7, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.