Chapter
Mar 7, 2022

Integrating Social Equity and Vulnerability with Infrastructure Resilience Assessment

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022

ABSTRACT

Resilient infrastructure, which better withstands, adapts, and recovers from disasters, plays an important role in mitigating the impacts of natural hazards to the communities. However, disparities exist in infrastructure damage and recovery across communities with different socioeconomic backgrounds. Socially vulnerable communities experience more severe infrastructure damage and require longer time to repair and resume infrastructure services. Thus, there is a need to systematically integrate social equity with infrastructure resilience assessment. To address this need, this paper proposes a social welfare-based infrastructure resilience assessment framework that accounts for (1) the unequal distribution of infrastructure damage and recovery across communities with different socioeconomic statuses and (2) the potentially higher infrastructure damage and longer recovery time in socially vulnerable communities. The proposed model can facilitate equitable resilience in infrastructure planning and recovery by allowing for a better understanding and assessment on how infrastructure in different communities is equally or unequally affected by disasters.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

AJMC (The American Journal of Managed Care). 2006. “Vulnerable Populations: Who Are They?” Last accessed on Jan 30, 2021. <https://cdn.sanity.io/files/0vv8moc6/ajmc/7156d97747bada738caf6bb3e702169373491cc8.pdf>.
Arrow, K. J. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. Vol 12, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Atkinson, A., and Brandolini, A. 2010. “On Analyzing the World Distribution of Income.” World Bank Economic Review, 24(1), 1–37.
Balaei, B., Wilkinson, S., Potangaroa, R., Hassani, N., and Alavi-Shoshtari, M. 2018. “Developing a framework for measuring water supply resilience.” Natural Hazards Review, 19(4), 04018013.
Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A., and Von Winterfeldt, D. 2003. “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., and Bruneau, M. 2010. “Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.” Engineering Structures, 32(11), 3639–3649.
Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., and Shirley, W. L. 2003. “Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards.” Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.
Clarke, M., and Islam, S. M. 2003. “Measuring social welfare: application of social choice theory.” Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(1), 1–15.
Flanagan, B. E., Gregory, E. W., Hallisey, E. J., Heitgerd, J. L., and Lewis, B. 2011. “A Social Vulnerability Index for Disaster Management.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1), 1–24.
Godschalk, D. R. 2003. “Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities.” Natural Hazards Review, 4(3), 136–143.
Harsanyi, J. C. 1955. “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility.” Journal of Political Economy, 63(4), 309–321.
Mao, Q., and Li, N. 2018. “Assessment of the impact of interdependencies on the resilience of networked critical infrastructure systems.” Natural Hazards, 93(1), 315–337.
Makropoulos, C., Nikolopoulos, D., Palmen, L., Kools, S., Segrave, A., Vries, D., Koop, S., Van Alphen, H. J., Vonk, E., Van Thienen, P., Rozos, E., and Medema G. 2018. “A resilience assessment method for urban water systems.” Urban Water Journal, 15(4), 316–328.
Masozera, M., Bailey, M., and Kerchner, C. 2007. “Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: A case study of New Orleans.” Ecological Economics, 63(2-3), 299–306.
Mostafa, M. A., and El-Gohary, N. M. 2014. “Stakeholder-sensitive social welfare–oriented benefit analysis for sustainable infrastructure project development.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(9), 04014038.
Nexus. 2017. “Hurricane Harvey hit low-income communities hardest” Last accessed Feb 05, 2020. <https://archive.thinkprogress.org/hurricane-harvey-hit-low-income-communities-hardest-d13506b7e60/>.
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rehak, D., Senovsky, P., Hromada, M., and Lovecek, T. 2019. “Complex approach to assessing resilience of critical infrastructure elements.” International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 25, 125–138.
Schneider, M., and Kim, B. C. 2020. “The utilitarian–maximin social welfare function and anomalies in social choice.” Southern Economic Journal, 87(2), 629–646.
Sen, A. 1997. On Economic Inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Yang, Y., Tang, W., Liu, Y., Xin, Y., and Wu, Q. 2018. “Quantitative resilience assessment for power transmission systems under typhoon weather.” IEEE Access, 6, 40747–40756.
Zhang, L., and Sanake, S. 2020. “Social Welfare-Based Human Comfort Aggregation Model to Facilitate Healthy and Comfortable Indoor Environments.” Journal of Architectural Engineering, 26(3), 04020027.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2022
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 299 - 309

History

Published online: Mar 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sunil Dhakal [email protected]
1Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., Miami, FL. Email: [email protected]
Lu Zhang, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
2Assistant Professor, Moss Dept. of Construction Management, Florida International Univ., Miami, FL. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$138.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$138.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share