Natural Disasters, Inequality, and Civil Infrastructure Systems: Developing Equitable Pathways toward Resilience
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022
ABSTRACT
The connections between natural disasters and socioeconomic inequality are complex and dynamically change due to the vicious cycle of socioeconomic disadvantage and disaster impacts. Because of the inherent complexity and the evolving nature of vulnerability, it is very difficult to deduce general statements or a general theory of vulnerability. This paper presents a novel social sensing approach for near real-time and context-specific identification of the physical and socioeconomic vulnerabilities in areas affected by natural disasters. A variety of data analysis and data mining techniques such as sentiment analysis, geo and temporal coding, content analysis, and clustering were used to identify socioeconomic, infrastructure, and regional vulnerabilities to natural disasters. The proposed method was tested for the impacts of the 2019 Hurricane Dorian on South Carolina. The results showed the promising capabilities of the proposed method in near real-time detecting of events such as flooding and power outages as well as identifying different types of vulnerabilities among various socioeconomic groups. The findings of this study facilitate quick decision-making for prioritization and allocation of resources to vulnerable communities in areas where major disaster events or infrastructure failures are detected. In addition, the proposed method enables identifying the underlying factors that make a community or an individual most vulnerable to the impacts of natural disasters.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Benight, C. C. (2004). Collective efficacy following a series of natural disasters. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 17(4), 401–420.
Bolin, B., and Kurtz, L. C. (2018). Race, class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability. In Handbook of disaster research (pp. 181–203). Springer, Cham.
Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., and Scott, M. S. (2012). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina (pp. 111–142). Routledge.
Hutto, C., and Gilbert, E. (2014). VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1). Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14550.
Islam, N., and Winkel, J. (2017). Climate change and social inequality, United Nations, https://doi.org/10.18356/2c62335d-en.
Kanungo, T., Mount, D. M., Netanyahu, N. S., Piatko, C. D., Silverman, R., and Wu, A. Y. (2002). An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: Analysis and implementation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 24(7), 881–892.
Mohammad, S. M. (2016). Sentiment analysis: Detecting valence, emotions, and other affectual states from text. In Emotion measurement (pp. 201–237). Woodhead Publishing.
Yoon, D. K. (2012). Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: a comparative study. Natural Hazards, 63(2), 823–843.
Zhang, C., Fan, C., Yao, W., Hu, X., and Mostafavi, A. (2019). Social media for intelligent public information and warning in disasters: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 190–207.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 7, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.