Chapter
May 24, 2022

Using Machine Learning to Identify the Most Critical Factors Affecting Maintenance of Tunnels

Publication: Computing in Civil Engineering 2021

ABSTRACT

Having well-maintained transportation infrastructure systems, including tunnels, is essential for the functioning and growth of the US economy. As such, monitoring the condition of tunnels through structural evaluation and inspections is essential to maintain their level of service. However, there is a lack of research that utilizes data from previous formal inspections to model and understand the condition of tunnels in the US. Being the case, this paper tackles this research need by developing a tunnel condition rating model that identifies the most critical factors affecting maintenance of tunnels. To this end, the authors utilize random forest (RF), which is a well-proven machine learning technique. RF is able to both identify the importance of features and utilize the selected features to accurately predict the condition rating of tunnels. The model is trained using data for tunnels in the US, from the Federal Highway Administration Agency (FHWA). Validation, testing, and hyperparameter tuning of the model are performed through a k-fold cross validation combined with a grid search algorithm. Results highlight the most critical features affecting maintenance of tunnels. In addition, the RF prediction model yields a satisfactory accuracy of more than 85%. Ultimately, the developed tunnel condition rating model can benefit transportation entities in understanding and predicting the condition rating of tunnels in the US, hence optimizing and prioritizing their maintenance plans.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Ali, G., Elsayegh, A., Assaad, R., and El-Adaway, I. H. (2019). “Artificial Neural Network Model for Bridge Deterioration and Assessment.” CSCE Annual Conference, 11.
ASCE. (2021). “ASCE’s 2021 American Infrastructure Report Card.”.
Assaad, R., and El-Adaway, I. H. (2020). “Bridge Infrastructure Asset Management System: Comparative Computational Machine Learning Approach for Evaluating and Predicting Deck Deterioration Conditions.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26(3), 04020032.
Assaad, R., Ahmed, M. O., El-Adaway, I. H., Elsayegh, A., and Siddhardh Nadendla, V. S. (2021). “Comparing the Impact of Learning in Bidding Decision-Making Processes Using Algorithmic Game Theory.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(1), 04020099.
Azeez, D., Gan, K. B., Ali, M. A., and Ismail, M. S. (2015). “Secondary triage classification using an ensemble random forest technique.” Technology and Health Care, 23(4), 419–428.
Baji, H., Li, C.-Q., Scicluna, S., and Dauth, J. (2017). “Risk-cost optimised maintenance strategy for tunnel structures.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 69, 72–84.
Bergstra, J., and Bengio, Y. (2012). “Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization.” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 281–305.
Chakrabarti, S. (2008). “Voltage stability monitoring by artificial neural network using a regression-based feature selection method.” Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 1802–1808.
Chen, J., Li, K., Tang, Z., Bilal, K., Yu, S., Weng, C., and Li, K. (2016). “A parallel random forest algorithm for big data in a spark cloud computing environment.” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 28(4), 919–933.
FHWA. (2015). “Specifications for the National Tunnel Inventory (SNTI)” https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/inspection/tunnel/snti/hif15006.pdf (Mar. 27, 2021).
Ghosal, V., Tikmani, P., and Gupta, P. (2009). “Face classification using Gabor wavelets and random forest.” In 2009 Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, IEEE, 68–73.
Hammerla, N. Y., and Plötz, T. (2015). “Let’s (not) stick together: Pairwise similarity biases cross-validation in activity recognition.” In Proc., 2015 ACM Int. Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Association for Computing Machinery, 1041–1051.
Han, X., Xia, Y., Ye, F., and Wang, Y. (2020). “Ageing models and maintenance strategy for road tunnels.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(5), 831–846.
Jiang, Y., Zhang, X., and Taniguchi, T. (2019). “Quantitative condition inspection and assessment of tunnel lining.” Automation in Construction, 102, 258–269.
Kursa, M. B., and Rudnicki, W. R. (2010). “Feature Selection with the Boruta Package.” Journal of Statistical Software, 36(11), 1–13.
Liu, K., and El-Gohary, N. (2017). “Ontology-based semi-supervised conditional random fields for automated information extraction from bridge inspection reports.” Automation in Construction, 81, 313–327.
Menendez, E., Victores, J. G., Montero, R., Martínez, S., and Balaguer, C. (2018). “Tunnel structural inspection and assessment using an autonomous robotic system.” Automation in Construction, 87, 117–126.
Okun, O., and Priisalu, H. (2007). “Random forest for gene expression based cancer classification: overlooked issues.” In Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Springer, 483–490.
Pilnenskiy, N., and Smetannikov, I. (2020). “Feature Selection Algorithms as One of the Python Data Analytical Tools” Future Internet, 12(3).
Reddy, C., Balasubramanyam, P., and Subbarayudu, M. (2013). “An effective approach to resolve multicollinearity in agriculture data.” International journal of research in electronics and computer engineering, 1(1), 27–30.
Shi, Y., Cui, L., Qi, Z., Meng, F., and Chen, Z. (2016). “Automatic Road Crack Detection Using Random Structured Forests.” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(12), 3434–3445.
Syarif, I., Bennett, A. P., and Wills, G. (2016). “SVM Parameter Optimization Using Grid Search and Genetic Algorithm to Improve Classification Performance.” Telkomnika, 14(4), 1502–1509.
USDOT. (2021). “National Tunnel Inventory Data.” https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/national-tunnel-inventory-data (Mar. 19, 2021).
Vincent, D. R., Deepa, N., Elavarasan, D., Srinivasan, K., Chauhdary, S. H., and Iwendi, C. (2019). “Sensors Driven AI-Based Agriculture Recommendation Model for Assessing Land Suitability.” Sensors, 19(17), 3667.
Xue, B., Zhang, M., Browne, W. N., and Yao, X. (2016). “A Survey on Evolutionary Computation Approaches to Feature Selection.” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 20(4), 606–626.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Computing in Civil Engineering 2021
Computing in Civil Engineering 2021
Pages: 1433 - 1440

History

Published online: May 24, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Muaz O. Ahmed [email protected]
1Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO. Email: [email protected]
Ramy Khalef [email protected]
2Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO. Email: [email protected]
Gasser G. Ali [email protected]
3Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO. Email: [email protected]
Islam H. El-Adaway [email protected]
4Hurst-McCarthy Professor of Construction Engineering and Management, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering and Dept. of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Identifying and Exploring Construction PM Evolution and Research Directions, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485286.038, (371-381), (2024).
  • Analyzing the Impact of DB versus DBB on Cost Performance in Airport Development: A Data-Driven Approach, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485286.002, (10-19), (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$358.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$358.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share