Chapter
May 24, 2022

A Simulation Model for Optimal Bidding Decisions

Publication: Computing in Civil Engineering 2021

ABSTRACT

The lowest bid approach is the most used technique in the US construction procurement environment since competitive bidding is a legal requirement in the public sector. Despite that many research studies were directed to help contractors in taking different bidding decisions, there is still insufficient research efforts that equipped contractors with decision-support tools to decide on optimal bid values. Hence, this paper takes previous research works a step further by developing a simulation model that can be adopted to determine the bid decision that would result in winning more projects. To this end, a methodology composed of multiple steps was utilized. First, a simulation model was developed to model the competitive bidding environment. Second, the modified Roth-Erev learning algorithm was used to determine optimal bidding decisions. Finally, the applicability and usefulness of the proposed simulation model was validated through a real-world set-up by relying on data from 503 actual public transportation projects in the US. The results reflected that the developed simulation framework can increase the winning percentage of contractors from 36.98% to 68.59%. In addition, the results showed that projects’ owners would also profit when contractors use the developed simulation model. Ultimately, this research adds to the body of knowledge by equipping contractors with a pragmatic decision-support tool that helps in winning more projects by determining optimal bid values.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Ahmed, M. O., El-Adaway, I. H., Coatney, K. T., and Eid, M. S. (2016). “Construction bidding and the winner’s curse: Game theory approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015076.
Assaad, R., Ahmed, M. O., El-Adaway, I. H., Elsayegh, A., and Siddhardh Nadendla, V. S. (2021). “Comparing the Impact of Learning in Bidding Decision-Making Processes Using Algorithmic Game Theory.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(1), 04020099.
Assaad, R., and El-Adaway, I. H. (2020). “Enhancing the knowledge of construction business failure: A social network analysis approach.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), 04020052.
Assaad, R., and El-Adaway, I. H. (2021). “Determining Critical Combinations of Safety Fatality Causes Using Spectral Clustering and Computational Data Mining Algorithms.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(5), 04021035.
Assaad, R., El-Adaway, I. H., and Abotaleb, I. (2020a). “Predicting project performance in the construction industry.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(5), 04020030.
Assaad, R., El-Adaway, I. H., El Hakea, A. H., Parker, M. J., Henderson, T. I., Salvo, C. R., and Ahmed, M. O. (2020b). “Contractual Perspective for BIM Utilization in US Construction Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(12), 04020128.
Awwad, R., and Ammoury, M. (2019). “Owner’s perspective on evolution of bid prices under various price-driven bid selection methods.” J. of Comp. in Civil Eng., 33(2), 04018061.
Awwad, R., Asgari, S., and Kandil, A. (2015). “Developing a virtual laboratory for construction bidding environment using agent-based modeling.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (6): 04014105.
Chao, L. C., and Liaw, S. J. (2019). “Fuzzy Logic Model for Determining Minimum Overheads-Cum-Markup Rate.” J. of Const. Engineering and Management, 145(4), 04019008.
Erev, I., and Roth, A. E. (1998). “Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria.” Am. Eco. Rev. 88(4):848–881.
Greenwald, A., and Jafari, A. (2003). “A general class of no-regret learning algorithms and game-theoretic equilibria.” In Learning theory and kernel machines, 2–12. Berlin: Springer.
Huang, Z (2016). “Modeling bidding decision in engineering field with incomplete information: A static game–based approach.” Advances in Mech. Eng., 8(1), 1687814015624830.
Ioannou, P. G. (2019). “Friedman’s bidding model: Errors and corrections.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(10), 04019058.
Ioannou, P. G., and Awwad, R. E. (2010). “Below-average bidding method.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), 936–946.
Kalan, D., and Ozbek, M. E. (2020). “Development of a construction project bidding decision-making tool.” Practice Period. on Structural Design and Construction, 25(1), 04019032.
Li, G., Chen, C., Martek, I., Ao, Y., and Dai, J. (2021a). “Bid or No-Bid Decision Model for International Construction Projects: Evidential Reasoning Approach.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(2), 04020161.
Li, G., Zhang, G., Chen, C., and Martek, I. (2020). “Empirical Bid or No Bid Decision Process in International Construction Projects: Structural Equation Modeling Framework.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), 04020050.
Li, M., Baek, M., and Ashuri, B. (2021b). “Forecasting Ratio of Low Bid to Owner’s Estimate for Highway Construction.” J. of Constr. Engineering and Management, 147(1), 04020157.
Nicolaisen, J., Petrov, V., and Tesfatsion, L. (2001). “Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing.” IEEE transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5(5), 504–523.
Pentapalli, M. (2008). A comparative study of Roth-Erev and modied Roth-Erev reinforcement learning algorithms for uniform-price double auctions. Master of Science Thesis, Department of Computer Science: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Rastegar, H., Arbab Shirani, B., Mirmohammadi, S. H., and Akhondi Bajegani, E. (2021). “Stochastic Programming Model for Bidding Price Decision in Construction Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4), 04021025.
Rowles, D., and Cahalan, S. (2020). “Local government procurement laws—Who the heck is a ‘responsible bidder’?” <https://www.sgrlaw.com/local-government-procurement-laws-who-the-heck-is-a-responsible-bidder/>(April 22, 2020).
Somboonpisan, J., and Limsawasd, C. (2021). “Environmental Weight for Bid Evaluation to Promote Sustainability in Highway Construction Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4), 04021013.
USGSA (US General Services Administration). (2016). “Bidding on federal construction projects.” <http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103328>(April 28, 2020).
Wang, X., Ye, K., and Arditi, D. (2021). “Embodied Cost of Collusive Bidding: Evidence from China’s Construction Industry.” J. of Constr. Eng. and Management, 147(6), 04021037.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Computing in Civil Engineering 2021
Computing in Civil Engineering 2021
Pages: 827 - 834

History

Published online: May 24, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rayan H. Assaad [email protected]
1Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering, Construction Engineering and Management and Critical Infrastructure, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ. Email: [email protected]
Muaz O. Ahmed [email protected]
2Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO. Email: [email protected]
Islam H. El-Adaway [email protected]
3Hurst-McCarthy Professor of Construction Engineering and Management, Professor of Civil Engineering, and Founding Director of Missouri Consortium for Construction Innovation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering and Dept. of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO. Email: [email protected]
Amr Elsayegh [email protected]
4Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$358.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$358.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share