Review of Data Serialization Challenges and Validation Methods for Improving Interoperability
Publication: Computing in Civil Engineering 2021
ABSTRACT
Digitalized communication and information exchange are the bedrock of smart cities and infrastructure. Enhancement of neutral data exchange platforms and data serialization is an inevitable step toward improving smart city architecture. Data serialization is defined as a process for encoding or translating data into neutral file formats so they could be transferrable or retrievable by other applications. The semantic data need to be communicated with other systems and, therefore, need to be converted into a neutral format that could be globally communicable. The Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) are one of the examples of neutral data exchange format that benefited the building information modeling (BIM) in the built environment. The expansion of neutral data exchange schemas is receiving more attention every day; however, it is full of challenges. Review and aggregation of challenges experienced by other researchers and their approaches for overcoming the interoperability complications could help future researchers. Moreover, reviewing the key elements in semantic and syntactic validation procedures improves the early planning of the project and improves the research process’s reliability. This paper reviews the most common data serialization methods and provides a summary of the challenges and gaps. The findings of this research can inspire other researchers with their data exchange system architecture, verification, and validation methods to increase the effectiveness of their research.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Adibfar, A., and Costin, A. (2018). “Next Generation of Transportation Infrastructure Management: Fusion of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and Bridge Information Modeling (BrIM)”, Advances in informatics and computing in civil and construction engineering, 43–50.
Adibfar, A., and Costin, A. (2019). “Evaluation of IFC for the Augmentation of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) into Bridge Information Models (BrIM)”, Proceedings of ASCE international conference on computing in civil engineering, June 17-19, 2019, Atlanta, Georgia.
Afsari, K., Eastman, C., and Castro-Lacouture, D. (2017). “JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) data serialization for IFC schema in web-based BIM data exchange”, Automation in Construction, 77, 24–51.
Costin, A., Adibfar, A., Hu., H., and Chen, S. (2018). “Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Transportation Infrastructure – Literature Review, Applications, and Challenges.” Automation in Construction, 94, 257–281.
Costin, A., and Eastman, C. (2019). “Need for Interoperability to Enable Seamless Information Exchanges in Smart and Sustainable Urban Systems”, Journal of computing in civil engineering, 33, 3.
Delgado, J. M., Butler, L. J., Gibbons, N., Brilakis, I., Elshafie, M. Z., and Middleton, C. (2017). “Management of structural monitoring data of bridges using BIM.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 170 (3), 204–218.
Gerrish, T., Ruikar, K., Cook, M. J., Johnson, M., and Phillip, M. (2015). “Attributing in-use building performance data to an as-built building information model for lifecycle building performance management”, Proc. of the CIB W78 Conference, Eindhoven Technical University, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp. 1–11.
Krijnen, T., and Beetz, J. (2018). “A SPARQL query engine for binary-formatted IFC building models”, Automation in Construction, 95, 46–63.
Liu, K., and El-Gohary, N. (2017). “Ontology-based semi-supervised conditional random fields for automated information extraction from bridge inspection reports.” Automation in Construction, 81, 313–327.
Lee, Y. C., Eastman, C., and Lee, J. K. (2015). “Validation for ensuring the interoperability of data exchange of a building information model”, Automation in Construction, 58, 176–195.
Pauwels, P., and Terkaj, W. (2016). “EXPRESS to OWL for construction industry: Toward a recommendable and usable ifcOWL ontology”, Automation in Construction, 63, 100–133.
Rasmussen, M., Frausing, C., Hviid, C., and Karlshoj, J. (2018). “Demo: Integrating Building Information Modeling and Sensor Observations using Semantic Web”, Proc. Of 9th International Semantic Sensor Networks Workshop - Asilomar Conference Grounds, Monterey, United State, 09-10 September.
Rio, J., Ferreira, B., and Poças Martins, J. (2013). “Expansion of IFC model with structural sensors”, Informes de la Construcción, 65(530), 219–228.
Shi, X., Liu, Y., Gao, G., Gu, M., and Li, H. (2018). “IFCdiff: A content-based automatic comparison approach for IFC files”, Automation in Construction, 86, 53–68.
Theiler, M., and Smarsly, K. (2018). “ IFC Monitor – An IFC schema extension for modeling structural health monitoring systems”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 37, 54–65.
W3C OWL Working Group. (2012). “OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (Second Edition).” <https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/>(Accessed Feb. 18, 2021).
Weichhart, G., Panetto, H., and Molina, A. (2021). “Interoperability in the cyber-physical manufacturing enterprise”, Annual Reviews in Control, In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.03.006.
Zhu, J., Wang, X., Chen, M., Wu, C., and Kim, M. (2019). “Integration of BIM and GIS: IFC geometry transformation to shapefile using enhanced open-source approach”, Automation in Construction, 106,102859.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: May 24, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.