Extreme Weather Impacts on the Condition and Service Life of Building Components
Publication: Geo-Extreme 2021
ABSTRACT
The impacts of extreme weather cause billions of dollars of damage each year to buildings and structures, and these costs continue to increase as climate patterns change and buildings are exposed to new and different hazards than what they were designed to withstand. For organizations with large building portfolios, such as the US Department of Defense (DoD), it is important to have an awareness of the risks that extreme weather presents when conducting strategic planning on the long-range sustainment, restoration, modernization, and eventual recapitalization of their building stock. The primary objective of this research is to develop a model to quantify the estimated condition loss and effective service life reduction to the components of a building due to extreme weather hazards, and use the results to communicate system level and facility level risks. To do this, a damage association matrix is defined, which links characteristic damage modes for a given climate hazard to building component types. The resulting condition loss as measured by a component condition index is associated to each damage mode, along with the likelihood that the damage mode materializes given the hazard occurrence. This is applied to an actual portfolio of buildings in a particular geographic location and with a pre-defined component inventory that comprises the building. A weather forecasting model is used to estimate hazard occurrence likelihood along with building location, component type, and age to adjust the expected service life. The approach uses findings at a component level to support building sustainment decisions related to individual component repair/replacement, as well as identifying potential mitigation activities to reduce damage extent or likelihood. These findings are also aggregated to a system or building level to support recapitalization decisions related to restoration/modernization or total building replacement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
CAP Congressional Action Plan (CAP). Congressional Action Report, 2020: Solving the Climate Crisis: Congressional Action Plan for a Clean Energy Economy and a Healthy, Resilient, and Just America”. June. https://climatecrisis.house.gov/.
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2019: Guidelines for Wind Vulnerability Assessments of Existing Critical Facilities. FEMA P-2062, September.
Grussing, M. N., Uzarski, D. R., and Marrano, L. R. (2006). Condition and reliability prediction models using the Weibull probability distribution. In Applications of advanced technology in transportation (pp. 19–24).
Grussing, M. N. (2014). Life cycle asset management methodologies for buildings. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 20(1), 04013007.
IDA Science and Technology Policy Institute (IDA). 2017. “A Review of the BUILDER Application for Assessing Federal Laboratory Facilities.”, February.
IIBHS, Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety. 2020. https://ibhs.org/about-ibhs/ibhs-research-center/.
IPCC. 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
Khanduri, A. C., and Morrow, G. C. (2003). Vulnerability of buildings to windstorms and insurance loss estimation. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 91(4), 455–467.
Larsen, P., Goldsmith, S., Smith, O., Wilson, M.L., Strzepek, K., Chinowsky, P. and Saylor, B. 2008. Estimating future costs for Alaska public infrastructure at risk from climate change, Global Environmental Change 18 (2008), 442–457.
Larsen, P. 2010. The role of scaling in societal applications: public and private infrastructure vulnerabilities. In C. Vorosmarty, D. McGuire, and J. Hobbie (Eds.), Scaling Studies in Arctic System Science and Policy Support. Arlington, Virginia: U.S. Arctic Research Commission.
Melvin, A., Larsen, P., Boehlert, B., Neumann, J., Chinowsky, P., Espinet, X., Martinich, J., Baumann, M., Rennels, L., Bothner, A., Nicolsky, D., and Marchenko, S. 2016. Climate change risks to Alaska public infrastructure: improved estimates of damages and the economics of proactive adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December.
Nawari, N. O. 2011: Analysis and prediction of building damage due to windstorms. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 119, 25–33.
Petri, Y., and Caldeira, K. (2015). Impacts of global warming on residential heating and cooling degree-days in the United States. Scientific Reports, 5, 12427. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12427
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2018. BUILDER Sustainable Management System. Accessed at: http://www.erdc.usace.army.mil/Media/Fact-Sheets/Fact-Sheet-Article-View/Article/476728/builder-sustainment-management-system/.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Nov 4, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.