ABSTRACT

Pipelines are the most common way to transport essential fluids, such as water, oil, and natural gas. A pipeline usually traverses a large geographical area, and it is likely to be exposed to geohazards, which might result in permanent ground deformations. These large deformations can occur due to landslide, lateral spreading, or fault movement. This experimental research focuses on the influence of boundary conditions on the performance of a pipeline in a reverse fault-crossing zone. Pipeline length in a fault area is generally far longer than the length of experimental models; therefore, it is challenging to properly simulate the far-field effect in laboratory studies. Because interactions between the pipe and surrounding soil in the hogging zone (bearing resistance) and sagging zone (uplift resistance) are not similar, a reverse fault-crossing area results in an asymmetric movement. This study presents the results of a series of a laboratory-scaled pipeline buried in a sandy layer with four different end conditions subjected to reverse fault offset: free (moving freely in three directions), axial-free (axially free but laterally fixed), springs (lateral and axial springs), and axial-fixed (axially fixed and laterally constrained by springs). The tests were carried out in a split-box apparatus modeling the reverse faulting under 1g conditions. The results show that the end-joint conditions of the pipe have a significant effect on failure mode of the pipeline. For the spring end joint simulating the bearing, uplift, and axial resistances of surrounding soil, local buckling occurred near the fault plane. Euler’s beam buckling was observed for the pipe with the axial-fixed end joint, and no significant deformation for the pipes with free and axial-free end joints was recorded. Finally, practical implications of the study are discussed, and recommendations are made for applying the results in experimental modeling of buried pipelines in reverse fault area are made.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Abdoun, T. H., D. Ha, M. J. O’Rourke, M. D. Symans, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2009. “Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29: 415–27.
Anderson, C. 2004. Soil–pipeline interaction of polyethylene natural gas pipelines in sand., Soil-pipeline Interaction of Polyethylene Natural Gas Pipelines in Sand.
Argyrou, C., T. D. O’Rourke, C. Pariya-Ekkasut, and H. E. Stewart. 2020. “Ductile iron pipeline response to earthquake-induced ground rupture”, Earthquake Spectra, 36: 832–55.
ASCE. 1984. Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems, Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines.
Cheong, T. P., K. Soga, and D. J. Robert. 2011. “3D FE Analyses of Buried Pipeline with Elbows Subjected to Lateral Loading”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137: 939–48.
Demirci, H. E., S. Bhattacharya, D. Karamitros, and N. Alexander. 2018. “Experimental and numerical modelling of buried pipelines crossing reverse faults”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 114: 198–214.
Ha, D., T. H. Abdoun, M. J. O’Rourke, M. D. Symans, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2008. “Buried high-density polyethylene pipelines subjected to normal and strike-slip faulting - A centrifuge investigation”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45: 1733–42.
Jalali, H. H., F. R. Rofooei, N. K. A. Attari, and M. Samadian. 2016. “Experimental and finite element study of the reverse faulting effects on buried continuous steel gas pipelines”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 86: 1–14.
Karamitros, D. K., G. D. Bouckovalas, and G. P. Kouretzis. 2007. “Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27: 200–11.
Karimian, S. A. 2006. Response of buried steel pipelines subjected to longitudinal and transverse ground movement, Response of Buried Steel Pipelines Subjected to Longitudinal and Transverse Ground Movement.
Kennedy, R. P., A. M. Chow, and R. A. Williamson. 1977. “Fault Movement Effects On Buried Oil Pipeline”, ASCE Transp Eng J, 103: 617–33.
Matlock, H., and L. C. Reese. 1960. “Generalized Solutions for Laterally Loaded Piles.” In.
Newmark, N. M., and W. J. Hall. 1975. “Pipeline Design To Resist Large Fault Displacement”: 416–25.
Ni, P., I. D. Moore, and W. A. Take. 2018. “Distributed fibre optic sensing of strains on buried full-scale PVC pipelines crossing a normal fault”, Géotechnique, 68: 1–17.
O’Rourke, M. J., and X. Liu. 2012. “Seismic design of buried and offshore pipelines”, Seismic Design of Buried and Offshore Pipelines.
Paulin, M. J., R. Phillips, J. I. Clark, A. Trigg, and I. Konuk. 1998. “Full-scale investigation into pipeline/soil interaction.” In Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, IPC, 779–87.
Saiyar, M., P. Ni, W. A. Take, and I. D. Moore. 2016. “Response of pipelines of differing flexural stiffness to normal faulting”, Géotechnique, 66: 275–86.
Sarvanis, G. C., S. A. Karamanos, P. Vazouras, E. Mecozzi, A. Lucci, and P. Dakoulas. 2018. “Permanent earthquake-induced actions in buried pipelines: Numerical modeling and experimental verification”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 47: 966–87.
Towhata, I. 2008. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering.
Tsatsis, A., M. Loli, and G. Gazetas. 2019. “Pipeline in dense sand subjected to tectonic deformation from normal or reverse faulting”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 127.
Turner, J. E. 2004. Lateral force-displacement behavior of pipes in partially saturated sand.
Vargas, W. M. 1998. Ring shear tests on large deformation of sand, Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Tokyo.
Vazouras, P., P. Dakoulas, and S. A. Karamanos. 2015. “Pipe-soil interaction and pipeline performance under strike-slip fault movements”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 72: 48–65.
Wang, L. R., and Y.-H. Yeh. 1985. “A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipeline for fault movement”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 13: 75–96.
Wood, D. M. 2004. Geotechnical modelling.
Wood, D. M., A. Crewe, and C. Taylor. 2002. “Shaking table testing of geotechnical models”, International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2: 01–13.
Wroth, C. P. 1979. “A review of the engineering properties of soils with particular reference to the shear modulus”, Univ. of Oxford.
Xie, X., M. D. Symans, M. J. O’Rourke, T. H. Abdoun, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2013. “Numerical modeling of buried HDPE pipelines subjected to normal faulting: A case study”, Earthquake Spectra, 29: 609–32.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Extreme 2021
Geo-Extreme 2021
Pages: 180 - 189

History

Published online: Nov 4, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hamid Rostami [email protected]
1Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL. Email: [email protected]
Abdolreza Osouli, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
2Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Edwardsville, IL. Email: [email protected]
Brent Vaughn, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
3Laboratory Specialist, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Edwardsville, IL. Email: [email protected]
Hamed Gholizadeh Touchaei [email protected]
4Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Edwardsville, IL. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share