Influence of Boundary Conditions on Response of Pipelines Crossing Reverse Fault Zone
Publication: Geo-Extreme 2021
ABSTRACT
Pipelines are the most common way to transport essential fluids, such as water, oil, and natural gas. A pipeline usually traverses a large geographical area, and it is likely to be exposed to geohazards, which might result in permanent ground deformations. These large deformations can occur due to landslide, lateral spreading, or fault movement. This experimental research focuses on the influence of boundary conditions on the performance of a pipeline in a reverse fault-crossing zone. Pipeline length in a fault area is generally far longer than the length of experimental models; therefore, it is challenging to properly simulate the far-field effect in laboratory studies. Because interactions between the pipe and surrounding soil in the hogging zone (bearing resistance) and sagging zone (uplift resistance) are not similar, a reverse fault-crossing area results in an asymmetric movement. This study presents the results of a series of a laboratory-scaled pipeline buried in a sandy layer with four different end conditions subjected to reverse fault offset: free (moving freely in three directions), axial-free (axially free but laterally fixed), springs (lateral and axial springs), and axial-fixed (axially fixed and laterally constrained by springs). The tests were carried out in a split-box apparatus modeling the reverse faulting under 1g conditions. The results show that the end-joint conditions of the pipe have a significant effect on failure mode of the pipeline. For the spring end joint simulating the bearing, uplift, and axial resistances of surrounding soil, local buckling occurred near the fault plane. Euler’s beam buckling was observed for the pipe with the axial-fixed end joint, and no significant deformation for the pipes with free and axial-free end joints was recorded. Finally, practical implications of the study are discussed, and recommendations are made for applying the results in experimental modeling of buried pipelines in reverse fault area are made.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Abdoun, T. H., D. Ha, M. J. O’Rourke, M. D. Symans, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2009. “Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29: 415–27.
Anderson, C. 2004. Soil–pipeline interaction of polyethylene natural gas pipelines in sand., Soil-pipeline Interaction of Polyethylene Natural Gas Pipelines in Sand.
Argyrou, C., T. D. O’Rourke, C. Pariya-Ekkasut, and H. E. Stewart. 2020. “Ductile iron pipeline response to earthquake-induced ground rupture”, Earthquake Spectra, 36: 832–55.
ASCE. 1984. Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems, Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines.
Cheong, T. P., K. Soga, and D. J. Robert. 2011. “3D FE Analyses of Buried Pipeline with Elbows Subjected to Lateral Loading”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137: 939–48.
Demirci, H. E., S. Bhattacharya, D. Karamitros, and N. Alexander. 2018. “Experimental and numerical modelling of buried pipelines crossing reverse faults”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 114: 198–214.
Ha, D., T. H. Abdoun, M. J. O’Rourke, M. D. Symans, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2008. “Buried high-density polyethylene pipelines subjected to normal and strike-slip faulting - A centrifuge investigation”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45: 1733–42.
Jalali, H. H., F. R. Rofooei, N. K. A. Attari, and M. Samadian. 2016. “Experimental and finite element study of the reverse faulting effects on buried continuous steel gas pipelines”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 86: 1–14.
Karamitros, D. K., G. D. Bouckovalas, and G. P. Kouretzis. 2007. “Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27: 200–11.
Karimian, S. A. 2006. Response of buried steel pipelines subjected to longitudinal and transverse ground movement, Response of Buried Steel Pipelines Subjected to Longitudinal and Transverse Ground Movement.
Kennedy, R. P., A. M. Chow, and R. A. Williamson. 1977. “Fault Movement Effects On Buried Oil Pipeline”, ASCE Transp Eng J, 103: 617–33.
Matlock, H., and L. C. Reese. 1960. “Generalized Solutions for Laterally Loaded Piles.” In.
Newmark, N. M., and W. J. Hall. 1975. “Pipeline Design To Resist Large Fault Displacement”: 416–25.
Ni, P., I. D. Moore, and W. A. Take. 2018. “Distributed fibre optic sensing of strains on buried full-scale PVC pipelines crossing a normal fault”, Géotechnique, 68: 1–17.
O’Rourke, M. J., and X. Liu. 2012. “Seismic design of buried and offshore pipelines”, Seismic Design of Buried and Offshore Pipelines.
Paulin, M. J., R. Phillips, J. I. Clark, A. Trigg, and I. Konuk. 1998. “Full-scale investigation into pipeline/soil interaction.” In Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, IPC, 779–87.
Saiyar, M., P. Ni, W. A. Take, and I. D. Moore. 2016. “Response of pipelines of differing flexural stiffness to normal faulting”, Géotechnique, 66: 275–86.
Sarvanis, G. C., S. A. Karamanos, P. Vazouras, E. Mecozzi, A. Lucci, and P. Dakoulas. 2018. “Permanent earthquake-induced actions in buried pipelines: Numerical modeling and experimental verification”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 47: 966–87.
Towhata, I. 2008. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering.
Tsatsis, A., M. Loli, and G. Gazetas. 2019. “Pipeline in dense sand subjected to tectonic deformation from normal or reverse faulting”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 127.
Turner, J. E. 2004. Lateral force-displacement behavior of pipes in partially saturated sand.
Vargas, W. M. 1998. Ring shear tests on large deformation of sand, Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Tokyo.
Vazouras, P., P. Dakoulas, and S. A. Karamanos. 2015. “Pipe-soil interaction and pipeline performance under strike-slip fault movements”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 72: 48–65.
Wang, L. R., and Y.-H. Yeh. 1985. “A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipeline for fault movement”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 13: 75–96.
Wood, D. M. 2004. Geotechnical modelling.
Wood, D. M., A. Crewe, and C. Taylor. 2002. “Shaking table testing of geotechnical models”, International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2: 01–13.
Wroth, C. P. 1979. “A review of the engineering properties of soils with particular reference to the shear modulus”, Univ. of Oxford.
Xie, X., M. D. Symans, M. J. O’Rourke, T. H. Abdoun, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2013. “Numerical modeling of buried HDPE pipelines subjected to normal faulting: A case study”, Earthquake Spectra, 29: 609–32.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Nov 4, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.