Chapter
Apr 15, 2021

Understanding Spatial Abilities and Spatial Strategy under Extreme Visual and Gravitational Environments

Publication: Earth and Space 2021

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to understand how spatial ability differs under extreme environments and to provide implications on individually relevant training approaches by using VR technologies. Special jobs under extreme conditions (e.g., astronaut or scuba diver) demand higher spatial ability and effective spatial strategy. This paper examines how the conflicts between visual vertical and the body vertical may affect spatial ability. In addition, the study tested the relationship between an individual’s tendency to adopt a certain spatial strategy (egocentric vs. allocentric) and their use of a particular spatial reference frame (body vs. visual) under the extreme condition.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7. 2014.
Bertels, C. (2006). Crew maintenance lessons learned from ISS and considerations for future manned missions. In SpaceOps 2006 Conference (p. 5952).
Clément, G., Allaway, H. C., Demel, M., Golemis, A., Kindrat, A. N., Melinyshyn, A. N., and Thirsk, R. (2015). Long-duration spaceflight increases depth ambiguity of reversible perspective figures. PloS one, 10(7), e0132317.
Castelli, L., Corazzini, L. L., and Geminiani, G. C. (2008). Spatial navigation in large-scale virtual environments: Gender differences in survey tasks. Computers in Human behavior, 24(4), 1643-1667.
Champion, R. A., and Adams, W. J. (2007). Modification of the convexity prior but not the light-from-above prior in visual search with shaded objects. Journal of Vision, 7(13), 10-10.
Dabbs J. M., Jr, Chang, E. L., Strong, R. A., and Milun, R. (1998). Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and human behavior, 19(2), 89-98.
Gagnon, D. (1985). Videogames and spatial skills: An exploratory study. ECTJ, 33(4), 263-275.
Galea, L. A., and Kimura, D. (1993). Sex differences in route-learning. Personality and individual differences, 14(1), 53-65.
Gluck, J., and Fitting, S. (2003). Spatial strategy selection: Interesting incremental information. International Journal of Testing, 3(3), 293-308.
Gramann, K. (2013). Embodiment of spatial reference frames and individualdifferences in reference frame proclivity. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 13(1), 1-25.
Harris, L. R., Jenkin, M., Jenkin, H., Zacher, J. E., and Dyde, R. T. (2017). The effect of long-term exposure to microgravity on the perception of upright. NPJ microgravity, 3(1), 1-9.
Hegarty, M., and Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32(2), 175-191.
Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., and Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34(2), 151-176.
Kanas, N. (2015). Psychology in deep space. Psychologist, 28(10), 804-807. 21.
Marin, F., and Beluffi, C. (2018). Computing the minimal crew for a multi-generational space journey towards Proxima b. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 71, 45-52.
Kozhevnikov, M., and Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29(5), 745-756.
Landon, L. B., Rokholt, C., Slack, K. J., and Pecena, Y. (2017). Selecting astronauts for long-duration exploration missions: Considerations for team performance and functioning. REACH, 5, 33-56.
Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex roles, 30(11-12), 765-779.
Leone, G., Lipshits, M., Gurfinkel, V., and Berthoz, A. (1995). Is there an effect of weightlessness on mental rotation of three-dimensional objects?. Cognitive Brain Research, 2(4), 255-267.
Malinowski, J. C., and Gillespie, W. T. (2001). Individual differences in performance on a large-scale, real-world wayfinding task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 73-82.
Matsakis, Y., Lipshits, M., Gurfinkel, V., and Berthoz, A. (1993). Effects of prolonged weightlessness on mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Experimental brain research, 94(1), 152-162.
McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological bulletin, 86(5), 889.
NASA (2015). How to train your astronauts. April 2, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/news/astronaut_training.
NASA (1995) Man-systems integration standards (MSIS). NASA Johnson Space Center Bioastronautics/Habitability and Human Factors Office.
O’Keefe, J., and Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environmental for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org/.
Ray, W. J., Newcombe, N., Semon, J., and Cole, P. M. (1981). Spatial abilities, sex differences and EEG functioning. Neuropsychologia, 19(5), 719-722.
Smith, C. M. (2014). Estimation of a genetically viable population for multigenerational interstellar voyaging: Review and data for project Hyperion. Acta Astronautica, 97, 16-29.
Stapleton, T., Heldmann, M., Schneider, S., O'Neill, J., Samplatsky, D., White, K., and Corallo, R. (2016, July). Environmental control and life support for deep space travel. 46th International Conference on Environmental Systems.
Tiziani, M. (2013). The Colonization of space, an anthropological outlook. Antrocom online Journal of Anthropology, 9(1), 225-236.
Vandenberg, S. G., and Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and motor skills, 47(2), 599-604.
Zhong, J. Y. (2013). Three types of environmental representations and individual differences in spatial navigation. Unpublished master's thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Retrieved from http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/47243.
Zhong, J. Y., and Kozhevnikov, M. (2016). Relating allocentric and egocentric survey-based representations to the self-reported use of a navigation strategy of egocentric spatial updating. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 154-1.
Zhu, L., Yao, Y., Xu, P., & Bian, Z. (2011, August). Study on space station design elements forintra-vehicular navigation: a survey. In Electronic and Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology (EMEIT), 2011 International Conference on (Vol. 9, pp. 4493-4496). IEEE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Earth and Space 2021
Earth and Space 2021
Pages: 434 - 445

History

Published online: Apr 15, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hannah Park [email protected]
1Dept. of Construction Science, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. Email: [email protected]
Manish Dixit [email protected]
2Dept. of Construction Science, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. Email: [email protected]
Nafiseh Faghihi [email protected]
3Dept. of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. Email: [email protected]
Ann McNamara [email protected]
4Dept. of Visualization, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. Email: [email protected]
Jyotsna Vaid [email protected]
5Dept. of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$116.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$116.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share