Uncertainty Quantification Modeling of Structures and Materials Using the Hypercomplex Differentiation Method
Publication: Earth and Space 2021
ABSTRACT
The advent of the use of complex and hypercomplex algebras for arbitrary order sensitivity computations provide a new and perhaps more efficient approach to estimate uncertainty. The basic concept is to explore probabilistic moment approximations of multivariable structure and material models, using high order, below sensitivity results from the hypercomplex finite-element method. The utilization of hypercomplex derivatives allow probabilistic moments to be estimated in a single simulation run, compared to Monte Carlo sampling, which can be computationally expensive for complex models. These moment approximations, specifically expected value, variance, skewness, and kurtosis, are used to estimate the probability density function of structure and material models using the generalized lambda distribution. Criteria to determine optimal order of approximation and parameter importance will be proposed and examined. These moment approximations can also be an efficient proxy for variance based Sobol indices. Sobol indices provide an estimate to the individual contribution of each input parameter to the output variance and identify non-important variables that can be fixed at their nominal values to reduce model complexity. For high dimensional models, the direct application of traditional variance-based global sensitivity analysis measures can be time consuming and impractical, whereas a sensitivity-based estimation can provide a low-cost meaningful substitute. An uncertainty quantification analysis is conducted on a fracture mechanics related effective modulus application.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Carvalho, F., Chen, C., and Labuz, J. (1997). Measurements of effective elastic modulus and microcrack density. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 34(3-4), 43.e1–43.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00239-6.
Fielder, R., Montoya, A., Millwater, H., and Golden, P. (2017). Residual stress sensitivity analysis using a complex variable finite element method. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 133, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.035.
Ramberg, J., Dudewicz, E., Tadikamalla, P., and Mykytka, E. (1979). A probability distribution and its uses in fitting data. Technometrics, 21(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.10489750.
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., and Tarantola, S. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis. The Primer (pp. 1–292). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470725184.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Apr 15, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.