Molecular Dynamics Modeling to Probe the Effect of Surface Functionalization on the Interfacial Adhesion and Shear Strength of Graphene/Epoxy Nanocomposites
Publication: Earth and Space 2021
ABSTRACT
Persistent research effort has been devoted for decades in developing materials for the aerospace industry. Among the most crucial requirements in the new generation of aerospace, vehicles are optimizing their structural material stiffness, strength, and fuel-to-weight ratio. Accordingly, it has been established that lightweight polymer-based composite materials represent the ideal alternative to relatively heavy metallic structural alloys. Graphene/epoxy nanocomposites have been attracted much attention due to their exceptional mechanical properties. They have been used in fabricating carbon fiber/graphene/epoxy hybrid composites for improved properties relative to traditional carbon fiber/epoxy composites. This work addresses the interfacial interaction and adhesion in graphene/epoxy nanocomposite materials. This is necessary to investigate and maintain the material integrity at the nanoscale level by tailoring the molecular network structure. Molecular dynamics simulation with a reactive force field was used to quantify the interfacial interaction energy of the nanocomposite constituents, and graphene pull-out simulations were used to determine the interfacial shear strength. It has been shown that surface functionalization of graphene nanoplatelets can significantly increase their interfacial adhesion with the hosting epoxy matrix. The results show that there is a tremendous improvement in the functionalized graphene/epoxy interfacial interaction energy up to ∼570%. Furthermore, surface functionalization of graphene nanoplatelets can improve the interfacial shear strength by ∼750 times. This substantial improvement is from altering the noncovalent graphene-epoxy interfacial adhesion into strong covalent bonding utilizing the functional groups. Furthermore, the wrinkled and rough topology of functionalized graphene is found to improve the interlocking mechanism with the host matrix. These findings are important to the future of synthesizing next generation ultra-strength and lightweight polymer-based nanocomposite materials.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Al Mahmud, H., Radue, M. S., Chinkanjanarot, S., and Odegard, G. M. (2019). “MD modeling of epoxy-based nanocomposites reinforced with functionalized graphene nanoplatelets.” Proc., Proceedings of the American Society for Composites, Thirty-Fourth Technical Conference, DEStech Publications, Inc., Lancaster, PA, USA, 89-105.
Al Mahmud, H., Radue, M. S., Chinkanjanarot, S., Pisani, W. A., Gowtham, S., and Odegard, G. M. (2019). “Multiscale modeling of carbon fiber-graphene nanoplatelet-epoxy hybrid composites using a reactive force field.” Composites Part B: Engineering, 172, 628-635.
Braun, O. M., and Kivshar, Y. S. (2013). The Frenkel-Kontorova model: concepts, methods, and applications, Springer Science & Business Media.
Hou, D., Lu, Z., Li, X., Ma, H., and Li, Z. (2017). “Reactive molecular dynamics and experimental study of graphene-cement composites: Structure, dynamics and reinforcement mechanisms.” Carbon, 115, 188-208.
Jin, Y., Duan, F., and Mu, X. (2016). “Functionalization enhancement on interfacial shear strength between graphene and polyethylene.” Applied Surface Science, 387, 1100-1109.
Li, Y., Liu, Y., Peng, X., Yan, C., Liu, S., and Hu, N. (2011). “Pull-out simulations on interfacial properties of carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer nanocomposites.” Computational Materials Science, 50(6), 1854-1860.
Lv, C., Xue, Q., Xia, D., and Ma, M. (2012). “Effect of chemisorption structure on the interfacial bonding characteristics of graphene–polymer composites.” Applied Surface Science, 258(6), 2077-2082.
Lv, C., Xue, Q., Xia, D., Ma, M., Xie, J., and Chen, H. (2010). “Effect of chemisorption on the interfacial bonding characteristics of graphene-polymer composites.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 114(14), 6588-6594.
Park, M.-S., Lee, S., and Lee, Y.-S. (2017). “Mechanical properties of epoxy composites reinforced with ammonia-treated graphene oxides.” Carbon letters, 21, 1-7.
Radue, M., and Odegard, G. (2018). “Multiscale modeling of carbon fiber/carbon nanotube/epoxy hybrid composites: Comparison of epoxy matrices.” Composites Science and Technology, 166, 20-26.
Shen, B., Zhai, W., Chen, C., Lu, D., Wang, J., and Zheng, W. (2011). “Melt blending in situ enhances the interaction between polystyrene and graphene through π–π stacking.” ACS applied materials & interfaces, 3(8), 3103-3109.
Stankovich, S., Dikin, D. A., Dommett, G. H., Kohlhaas, K. M., Zimney, E. J., Stach, E. A., Piner, R. D., Nguyen, S. T., and Ruoff, R. S. (2006). “Graphene-based composite materials.” nature, 442(7100), 282.
Vanossi, A., Manini, N., Urbakh, M., Zapperi, S., and Tosatti, E. (2013). “Colloquium: Modeling friction: From nanoscale to mesoscale.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 85(2), 529.
Zaman, I., Phan, T. T., Kuan, H.-C., Meng, Q., La, L. T. B., Luong, L., Youssf, O., and Ma, J. (2011). “Epoxy/graphene platelets nanocomposites with two levels of interface strength.” Polymer, 52(7), 1603-1611.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Apr 15, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.