Pipelines 2020
Predicting Condition of Sanitary Sewer Pipes with Gradient Boosting Tree
Publication: Pipelines 2020
ABSTRACT
Utility managers and owners have challenges when addressing appropriate intervals for inspection of gravity sanitary sewer pipelines and other underground pipeline systems. Closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspection technology is the most common method to identify aging sewer pipes requiring rehabilitation. While these inspections provide essential information on the condition of pipes, assessing all pipes in the network is expensive, and often limited to small portions of an entire sewer system. Therefore, it would be more beneficial to use predictive analytics to leverage existing inspection datasets and then forecast the condition of pipes that have not yet been inspected. The predictive capabilities of machine learning model, namely gradient boosting tree is demonstrated based on data provided by inspection reports from City of Tampa. Three main factors, physical, operational, and environmental were considered during the selection of variables in development of this model. Thirteen independent variables including pipe’s age, material, diameter, flow rate, pipe segment length, depth, slope, soil type, pH, sulfate content, water table, soil hydraulic group, and soil corrosivity were used to build the prediction model. Complications posed by imbalance between condition classes are overcome by changing the classification classes into a binary format (where pipes are in either good or critical structural condition) and then the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) and confusion matrix were used to measure the performance of the model. The developed model showed 87% accuracy to predict condition of un-inspected sewer pipes. The results can be used by utility companies and municipalities to forecast condition of sanitary sewer pipes, schedule inspection times, and make cost-effective decisions to match budget allocations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Ana, E., Bauwens, W., Pessemier, M., Thoeye, C., Smolders, S., Boonen, I., and Gueldre, G. D. (2009). “An investigation of the factors influencing sewer structural deterioration.” Urban Water Journal, 6(4), 303–312.
ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) (2017). Report Card for America’s Infrastructure. ASCE, Reston, VA, USA. Retrieved from: https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/, March 2018.
Baur, R., and Herz, R. (2002). “Selective inspection planning with ageing forecast for sewer types.” Journal of Water Science and Technology, 46(6-7), 389–396.
Chughtai, F., Zayed, T. (2008). “Infrastructure Condition Prediction Models for Sustainable Sewer Pipelines.” Journal of Constructed Facilities, 22 (5),333–341.
EPA, (2004), “Report to Congress; Impacts and Control of CSOs and SSOs.” August 2018, <www.Ep.gov/nrmrl>.
EPA, (2007), “Innovation and Research for Water Infrastructure for the 21st Century.” April 2018, <www.Ep.gov/nrmrl>.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., (2017) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer, London.
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Khazraeializadeh, S. (2012). “A comparative analysis on sewer structural condition grading systems using four sewer condition assessment protocols.” Master’s thesis, Edmonton: Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, The University of Alberta, Canada.
Kley, G., and Caradot, N. (2013). “D1.2. REVIEW OF SEWER DETERIORATION MODELS.”, Berlin, Germany.
Malek Mohammadi, M. (2019). “Development of Condition Prediction Models for Sanitary Sewer Pipes.” Dissertation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, U.S.
Malek Mohammadi, M., Najafi, M., Kaushal, V., Serajiantehrani, R., Salehabadi, N., Ashoori, T. (2019). “Sewer Pipes Condition Prediction Models: A State-of-the-Art Review.” Journal of Infrastructure, MDPI.
Malek Mohammadi, M., Najafi, M., Tabesh, A., Riley, J. and Gruber, J. (2019). “Condition Prediction of Sanitary Sewer Pipes.” ASCE Pipeline Conference, 2019, Nashville, TN, U.S.
Moteleb, M. (2010). “Risk based decision making tools for sewer infrastructure management.” Doctoral Dissertation. University of Cincinnati. OH, USA.
Najafi, M., and Gokhale, S. B. (2005). Trenchless technology: pipeline and utility design, construction, and renewal. McGraw-Hill, New York.
National Research Council Canada (NRC). (2004). “Municipal Infrastructure Planning (MIIP) Report: An Evaluation of Condition Assessment Protocols for Sewer Management.”. Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Opila, M. C. (2011). “Structural Condition Scoring of Buried Sewer Pipes for Risk-Based Decision Making.” Doctoral Dissertation. University of Delaware. Newark, DE, USA.
Rokach, L., and Maimon, O. (2015). Data mining with decision trees: theory and applications. World Scientific Pub. Co, Singapore.
Seo, S. (2006). “A Review and Comparison of Methods for Detecting Outliers in Univariate Data Sets.” Thesis, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Pipelines 2020
Pages: 80 - 89
Editors: J. Felipe Pulido, OBG, Part of Ramboll and Mark Poppe, Brown and Caldwell
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8320-6
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 6, 2020
Published in print: Aug 6, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.