Chapter
Nov 9, 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020

Identifying Key Factors that Inform Project Delivery Method Selection in the Water Industry

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts

ABSTRACT

It is vital for water utilities to select the most appropriate project delivery method for the design and construction of their infrastructure projects. Alternative project delivery methods (APDM), such as construction management at-risk (CMAR) and design-build (DB), are now being added to design-bid-build (DBB) as part of a more comprehensive project delivery method toolbox for these utilities. The objective of this study is to identify key project delivery method selection factors for the water industry to support utilities in selecting the most suitable delivery method for their treatment plant projects. The authors reviewed about 40 relevant academic research papers and 15 decision-models that highlighted key project delivery method selection factors. As a result, 44 selection factors were identified and ranked in terms of frequency. An industry workshop was conducted with 20 industry experts and resulted in the identification of 13 key selection factors, seven primary factors, and six secondary factors, that inform project delivery method selection for the water industry. The identified factors in this paper will support the development of a decision-support tool that will assist water utilities with their project delivery method selection decisions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work is funded by the Water Research Foundation (WRF) Project #4685 “Project Delivery Performance Evaluation and Decision Support Tool for Water and Wastewater Capital Projects.” The authors would also like to thank all industry experts for their support.

REFERENCES

Airports Council International-North America, Airport Consultants Council and the Associated General Contractors of America (ACI-NA, ACC, and AGC) (2012), Airport owners’ guide to project delivery systems 2nd edition, ACI-NA, ACC and the AGC.
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) (2009), A guidebook for selecting airport capital project delivery methods, ACRP.
Al Khalil, M.I. (2002). “Selecting the appropriate project delivery method using AHP.” I. J. of Proj. Manage., 20(6), 464–469.
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development (ADEED) (2017), Project delivery method handbook, ADEED, Juno, AK.
Alhazmi, T. and McCaffer, R. (2000). “Project procurement system selection model.” J. of Constr. Eng. and Manage., 126(3), 176-184.
American Water Works Association (AWWA) (2010), M47 capital project delivery, AWWA, 17-70.
American Water Works Association (AWWA) (2014). “Going green in the water and wastewater industry: how design-build facilitates certainty.” 2014 AWWA Water Infrastructure Conference, Atlanta, GA.
American Water Works Association (AWWA) (2016), State of the water industry report, AWWA, Denver, CO.
Benson, L., Bodniewicz, B., Vittands, J.P., Carr, J., Watson, K. (2013). “Innovative design-build procurement approach for large wastewater facility.” Proceedings of WEFTEC 2013, (17), 7253-7269.
Bishop, M.M. (2010). “Design-build and alternate project delivery: an engineer's perspective.” 2010 Annual Conference Proceedings, AWWA, Chicago, IL.
Cannon, J., and Hildebrand, M. (2015). “Alternative project delivery selection framework.” Proceedings of the WEF 2015, WEF, (6), 1-6.
Chan, C.T. (2007). “Fuzzy procurement selection model for construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 25(6), 611–618.
Cheung, S.O., Lam, T.I., Wan, Y.W., and Lam, K.C. (2001). “Improving objectivity in procurement selection.” J. of Manage. Eng., 17(3), 132–139.
Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) (2012), An owner’s guide to project delivery method, CMAA, McLean, VA
Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) (2014), Project delivery selection approach, CDOT Business Center, Denver, CO.
Comstock, K. (2011). “Using design-build to create the next generation water reuse facility: the Johns Creek environmental campus.” 2011 Annual Conference Proceedings, AWWA, Washington, D.C.
Culp, G. (2011). “Alternative project delivery methods for water and wastewater projects: do they save time and money?” Leader. Manag. Eng, (11)3.
Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975), Group techniques for program planning, Scott, Foresman Glenview.
Design Build Institute of America (DBIA) (2015), Choosing a project delivery method, a design-build done right primer, DBIA, Washington, D.C.
Fredell, J., Riley, K., and Higgins, D. (2016). “On time and under budget: how southern colorado’s water delivery project engineered success.” AWWA, 108(3), 43-53.
Gates, S.R., Bonner, L.H., Batista, J., and Shrestha, P.P. (2015). “Lessons learned by owners using design-build project delivery.” Water Design-Build Council.
Giachino, J., Cecil, M., Husselbee, B., and Matthews, C. (2015). “Alternative project delivery: construction management at risk, design-build and public-private partnerships.” Proceedings of the WEF 2015, (11), 1-11.
Gilbert, R. (2010). “Successful implementation and commissioning of a municipal construction management at risk project.” 2010 AWWA Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL.
Gordon, C.M. (1994). “Choosing appropriate construction contracting method.” J. of Constr. Eng., 120(1), 196–210.
Hale, D. R., Shrestha, P. P., Gibson Jr., G. E., and Migliaccio, G. C. (2009). “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. of Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(7), 579–587.
Halter, S.B. (2010). “Performance evaluation of design-build versus design-bid-build for water and wastewater facilities.” 2010 AWWA Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL.
Jaime Partners Staffs. (2017). “Design build vs. design bid build.” <https://jaimepartners.com/design-build-vs-design-bid-build/> (Jun. 25, 2019)
King, G.D. (2015). “Learning lessons from design/build projects at Nevada Irrigation District.” Proceedings of the WEF2015, WEF, (14), 1-14.
Kumaraswamy, M. M., & Dissanayaka, S. M. (1998). “Industry development through creative project packaging and integrated management.” J. of Eng., Constr. and Arch. Manage., 5(3), 228-38.
Liu, B., Huo, T., Shen, Q., Yang, Z., Meng, J., and Xue, B. (2014). “Which owner characteristics are key factors affecting project delivery system decision making? Empirical analysis based on the rough set theory.” J. Manage. Eng., 31(4).
Love, P.E.D., Skitmore, M., and Earl, G. (1998). “Selecting a suitable procurement method for a building project.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 16(2).
Luu, D.T., Ng, S.T., and Chen, S.E. (2003a). “Parameters governing the selection of procurement system: an empirical survey.” Eng., Constr. Arch. Manage., 10(3), 209–218.
Luu, D.T., Ng, S.T., and Chen, S.E. (2003b). “A case-based procurement advisory system for construction.” Advan. Eng. Softw., 34(7), 429–438.
Luu, D.T., Ng, S.T., and Chen, S.E. (2005). “Formulating procurement selection criteria through case-based reasoning approach.” J. Comp. Civil Eng., 19(3).
Luu, D.T., Ng, S.T., Chen, S.E., and Jeffries, M. (2006). “A strategy for evaluating a fuzzy case-based construction procurement selection system.” Adv. Eng. Softw., 37(3), 159-171.
Mafakheri, F., Dai, L., Slezak, D., and Nasiri, F. (2007). “Project delivery system selection under uncertainty: multi-criteria multilevel decision aid model.” J. Manage. Eng., 23(4), 200–206.
Mahdi, I. M., and Alreshaid, K. (2005). “Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP).” I. J. Proj. Manage., (7), 564–572.
Melcher, B. (2009). “Design-Build project delivery for sewer system rehabilitation.” Proceedings of the WEF 2009, (9), 523-531.
Meszaros, G. (2011). “CM-at-risk as a means to facilitate relationships among the owner, designer and constructor.” 2011 AWWA Conference Proceedings, Washington, D.C.
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) (2014), Project delivery method selection workshop, MnDOT, Saint Paul, MN.
Mogerman, A., Mendis, D., and Hewage, K. (2016). “Project delivery and contracting strategies for district energy projects in Canada.” Canad. J. Civil Eng., 43, 461-471.
Molenaar, K.R., and Songer, A.D. (1998). “Model for public sector design-build project selection.” J.Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 467–479.
Molenaar, K. R., Bogus, S. M., and Priestley, J. M. (2004). “Design/build for water/wastewater facilities: state of the industry survey and three case studies.” J. of Manage. Eng., 20(1), 16-24.
Orange County Public Works Department (OCPW) (2017), Project delivery method selection tool guide, OCPW, Santa Ana, CA.
Oyetunji, A.A., and Anderson, S.D. (2006). “Relative effectiveness of project delivery and contract strategies.” J. of Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(1), 3–13.
Rao, T. (2009). “Is Design-build right for your next WWW project?” Proceedings of the 2009 WEF, (15), 6444-6458.
Ribeiro, F.L. (2001). “Project delivery system selection: a case-based reasoning framework.” Logist. Info. Manage., 14(5), 367–375.
Shorney-Darby, H. (2010), Design-build for water and wastewater projects, AWWA, Denver, CO.
Shorney-Darby, H. (2012). “How do design-bid-build and design-build differ?” AWWA, 47-53.
Skitmore, R.M., Marden, D.E. (1988). “Which procurement system? Towards a universal procurement selection technique.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 6, 71–89.
Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). (2002), Alternative Project Delivery, TWDB, Austin, TX.
Tisdale, R. (2016), 2X capex forecasted for U.S. municipal water & wastewater pipe networks from the previous decade, or $300 billion over next ten-years, Bluefield Research, Boston, MA.
Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., and Ghavamifar, K. (2011). “Selection of project delivery method in transit: drivers and objectives.” J. Manage. Eng., 27(1), 21-27.
Tran, D. (2013). “A risk-based model to select delivery methods for highway design and construction projects.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO.
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) (2009), A guidebook for the evaluation of project delivery methods, TCRP, Washington, D.C.
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) (2016), Project delivery selection guidance, WSDOT, Olympia, WA.
Water Design-Build Council (WDBC) (2016), Water and wastewater design-build handbook fourth edition, Water Design-Build Council, Edgewater, MD.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts
Pages: 1212 - 1220
Editors: David Grau, Ph.D., Arizona State University, Pingbo Tang, Ph.D., Arizona State University, and Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., Arizona State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8288-9

History

Published online: Nov 9, 2020
Published in print: Nov 9, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jeffrey Feghaly, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student and Graduate Research Associate, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ. E-mail: [email protected]
Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor and Fulton Exemplar Faculty, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ. E-mail: [email protected]
Samuel Ariaratnam, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E., P.Eng.
Professor and Construction Engineering Program Chair, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share