Chapter
Nov 9, 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020

A New Perspective in Integrated Facility Management: Using Kano Model to Evaluate Design and Construction, Operation, and Human Capital Attributes

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts

ABSTRACT

Researchers, as well as service providers, usually focus on intangible operational aspects of facility management to improve user satisfaction. While the intangible characteristics are very important, there is a need to study the impact of tangible design and construction characteristics on users’ satisfaction. This phenomenon creates a necessity to conduct a comprehensive study on integration of tangible and intangible attributes belonging to three major aspects of facility management (design and construction, operation, and human capital) leading to users’ satisfaction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate and prioritize attributes not only related to intangible aspects of operation and human capital but also tangible aspects of design and construction based on a retail store facility. To successfully achieve the objectives of this study, a survey containing two sections was developed and distributed among 400 respondents. First section of the survey was utilized to assign rankings to the attributes based on their impact on user satisfaction. The second section of the survey was utilized to assign weighs on the attributes using Kano evaluation criteria. Analysis of the first section of the survey indicated that users experience high level of satisfaction when the store is designed and constructed with visually appealing physical facilities. Users also experience high satisfaction when the service providers’ operation offers flexibility to the users. In addition, interaction with courteous employees was also found important for user satisfaction. Analysis of second section of the survey indicated that few attributes like availability of convenient parking lots has a positive correlation with user satisfaction. In addition, few attributes such as designing an organized layout for the service providers are must-be features to the users that often their presence are unnoticed, while their absence cause severe dissatisfaction. It was also concluded that to gain maximum customer satisfaction, not only intangible service attributes but also tangible construction attributes are needed to be considered during the design phase with great attention. The findings of this study guides facility managers to invest more financial and human resources in attributes which yield maximum end-user satisfaction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Avikal, S., Jain, R., and Mishra, P. K. (2014). “A Kano model, AHP and M-TOPSIS method-based technique for disassembly line balancing under fuzzy environment.” Applied Soft Computing, 25, 519-529.
Bureau of Economic Analysis, (2019). “Gross Domestic Product by Industry: Fourth Quarter and Annual 2018.” U.S. Department of Commerce, https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gdp-industry (July 18, 2019).
Bureau of Labor Statistics, (2017). “Employment by major industry sector.” United States Department of Labor, https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/employment-by-major-industry-sector.htm (July 19, 2019).
Chen, L. F. (2012). “A novel approach to regression analysis for the classification of quality attributes in the Kano model: an empirical test in the food and beverage industry.” Omega, 40(5), 651-659.
Chen, M. K., Lin, Y. L., and Chen, I. W. (2015). “Constructing innovative service quality for department stores.” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(5-6), 482-496.
Ek, F. İ., and Çıkış, Ş. (2015). “Integrating the Kano model into the architectural design: quality measurement in mass-housing units.” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(3-4), 400-414.
Fisher, A. G. (1939). “Production, primary, secondary and tertiary.” Economic Record, 15(1), 24-38.
Go, M., and Kim, I. (2018). “In-flight NCCI management by combining the Kano model with the service blueprint: A comparison of frequent and infrequent flyers.” Tourism Management, 69, 471-486.
Gray, E., Grimaud, A., and Le Bris, D. (2018). “The farmer, the blue-collar, and the monk: Understanding economic development through saturations of demands and non-homothetic productivity gains.”
Ibrahim, Z., Dana, L., Mahdi, A. F., Zin, M. Z. M., Ramli, M. A., and Nor, M. R. M. (2013). “Evaluation of Malaysian retail service quality.” Asian Social Science, 9(4), 14.
Kano, N. (1984). “Attractive quality and must-be quality.” Hinshitsu Quality, The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14, 39-48.
Kermanshachi, S. (2009). “Identifying Service Quality Attributes That Influence Young Customers’ Level of Satisfaction in Retail Stores by Using Kano Model,” Master’s Thesis, Eastern Mediterranean University, 2009.
Llinares, C., & Page, A. F. (2011). “Kano’s model in Kansei engineering to evaluate subjective real estate consumer preferences.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(3), 233-246.
Matzler, K., and Hinterhuber, H. H. (1998). “How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment.” Technovation, 18(1), 25-38.
Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H. H., Bailom, F., and Sauerwein, E. (1996). “How to delight your customers.” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 5(2), 6-18.
Mou, S., Robb, D. J., and DeHoratius, N. (2018). “Retail store operations: Literature review and research directions.” European Journal of Operational Research, 265(2), 399-422.
Nadiri, H., and Tümer, M. (2009). “Retail services quality and behavioral intentions: an empirical application of the retail service quality scale in Northern Cyprus.”
Ngo, V. M., & Nguyen, H. H. (2016). The relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty: An investigation in Vietnamese retail banking sector. Journal of Competitiveness.
Salehzadeh, R., Shahin, A., Kazemi, A., & Shaemi Barzoki, A. (2015). “Is organizational citizenship behavior an attractive behavior for managers? A Kano model approach.” Journal of Management Development, 34(5), 601-620.
Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, K., and Hinterhuber, H. H. (1996). “The Kano model: How to delight your customers.” In International Working Seminar on Production Economics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 313-327.
Shahin, A., Mohammadi, S., Harsij, H., and Rahbar Qazi, M. R. (2017). “Revising satisfaction and dissatisfaction indexes of the Kano model by reclassifying indifference requirements: A case study of the presidential elections.” The TQM Journal, 29(1), 37-54.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts
Pages: 793 - 801
Editors: David Grau, Ph.D., Arizona State University, Pingbo Tang, Ph.D., Arizona State University, and Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., Arizona State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8288-9

History

Published online: Nov 9, 2020
Published in print: Nov 9, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Thahomina Jahan Nipa [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. E-mail: [email protected]
Sharareh Kermanshachi, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share