Chapter
Nov 9, 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020

An Empirical Analysis of Sources of Cost and Schedule Growth for Facilities Projects

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts

ABSTRACT

Cost and schedule growth have been a heavily studied topic within the construction industry, particularly related to the horizontal sector or within the context of projects of substantial size. Yet relatively little research has focused on smaller project sizes within the facilities operation and maintenance sector, which comprised of vertical projects that typically possess low individual dollar values but occur with high frequency. To address this gap, 881 projects were collected from the facilities management programs of 19 owner organizations in the public, vertical, and institutional sector. A unique contribution of this study was a comprehensive analysis of a project control tool: deviations report, which was updated weekly by the contractor for each project and contained all the issues that occurred during the construction phase of the project. Results not only show overall project cost and schedule growth rates, but also portion these into different causes, among the three main project stakeholders: owner, designer, contractor, and unforeseen conditions. Differences in the frequency and magnitude of the causes were investigated via the Kruskal-Wallis H test. Analysis revealed that owners were the largest cause of cost and schedule growth, followed by designers and unforeseen conditions, and, lastly, contractors. This study assists practitioners to plan for the leading sources of cost and schedule growth within facilities management programs of the vertical institutional sector. The study was limited to design bid build (D-B-B) project in vertical public sector.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Anastasopoulos, P., and Mannering, F. (2009). “A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 41(1), 153–159.
Antoine, A. L., Alleman, D., and Molenaar, K. R. (2018). “Examination of Project Duration, Project Intensity, and Timing of Cost Certainty in Highway Project Delivery Methods.” J. Manage. Eng., 35(1), p.04018049.
Badger, W. W. and Garvin, M. J. (2007), “Facilities asset management: challenges and opportunities.” 25th CME Conference Proceedings, University of Reading, UK, July 14-17.
Call, S., Sullivan, K., and Smithwick, J. (2018). “The US Healthcare Facilities Management Industry's State of Hiring from Facilities Management Academic Programs.” J. Facil. Manage. Ed. Re., 2(1), 19-25.
Carpenter, N., and Bausman, D. C. (2016). “Project delivery method performance for public school construction: Design-bid-build versus CM at risk.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 142(10), 05016009.
Chan, A. P. C., Scott, D., and Lam, E. W. M. (2002), “Framework of success criteria for design/build projects” J. Manage. Eng., 18(3), 120-128.
Chan, D. W., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1997). “A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 15(1), 55-63.
Chen, Q., Xia, B., Jin, Z., Wu, P., and Hu, Y. (2015) "Choosing appropriate contract methods for design-build projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 32(1), 04015029.
El-Razek, M. E., Bassioni, H. A., and Mobarak, A. M. (2008). “Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(11), 831-841.
El-Wardani, M., Messner, J., and Horman, M. (2006). “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(3), 230–238.
Hale, D. R., Shrestha, P. P., Gibson, G. E. Jr, and Migliaccio, G. C. (2009). “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(7), 579-587.
Hurtado, K., Savicky, J., Sullivan, K., Smithwick, J., and Gajjar, D. (2018). “Construction Portfolio Management Model for Institutions.” In Construction Research Congress, ASCE, New Orleans, LA, 168-177.
Isa, M. F. M., and Usmen, M. (2015). “Improving university facilities services using Lean Six Sigma: a case study.” J. Facil. Manage., 13(1), 70-84.
Gündüz, M., Nielsen, Y., and Özdemir, M. (2012). “Quantification of delay factors using the relative importance index method for construction projects in Turkey.” J. Manage. Eng., 29(2), 133-139.
(NCES) National Center for Education Studies. (2014). “The Condition of Education 2015.” http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/coe_cga.pdf (August 15, 2019)
Perrenoud, A., Smithwick, J., Hurtado, K., and Sullivan, K. (2016). “Project risk distribution during the construction phase of small building projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 32(3), 04015050.
Perrenoud, A., Lines, C. B., and Sullivan, T. K. (2014). “Measuring risk management performance within a capital program.” J. Facil. Manage., 12(2), 158-171.
Shdid, C. A., Andary, E., Chowdhury, A. G., and Ahmad, I. U. (2019). “Project performance rating model for water and wastewater treatment plant public projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 35(2), 04018064.
Shehu, Z., Endut, I. R., Akintoye, A., and Holt, G. D. (2014). “Cost overrun in the Malaysian construction industry projects: A deeper insight.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 32(8), 1471-1480.
Sullivan, K., Kashiwagi, J., and Kashiwagi, D. (2010). “The optimizing of design delivery services for facility owners.” J. Facil. Manage., 8(1), 26-46.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts
Pages: 740 - 749
Editors: David Grau, Ph.D., Arizona State University, Pingbo Tang, Ph.D., Arizona State University, and Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., Arizona State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8288-9

History

Published online: Nov 9, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Amirali Shalwani [email protected]
Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. E-mail: [email protected]
Brian Lines [email protected]
Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. E-mail: [email protected]
Jake Smithwick [email protected]
Dept. of Engineering Technology and Construction Management, Univ. of North Carolina–Charlotte, Charlotte, NC. E-mail: [email protected]
Justin Dodd [email protected]
Dept. of Engineering Technology and Construction Management, Univ. of North Carolina–Charlotte, Charlotte, NC. E-mail: [email protected]
Dipin Kasana [email protected]
Dept. of Engineering Technology and Construction Management, Univ. of North Carolina–Charlotte, Charlotte, NC. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share