Chapter
Nov 9, 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020

Construction Management and Engineering Technology Students’ Career Resiliency and the Role of Self-Efficacy

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2020: Safety, Workforce, and Education

ABSTRACT

The reporting on workforce development and attracting professionals into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers remains a prominent focus in the United States (U.S.). Whether in the construction or engineering sector, a similar crisis exists with maintaining and increasing the professional workforce. Underrepresented minority groups (e.g., women, ethnic minorities, and first-generation college students) are posited as a means to increase not only participation in these fields, but as an untapped resource in other STEM professions. In response, this study analyzes career decisions of undergraduate students in construction management and engineering technology bachelor’s degree programs in the U.S. to understand their resiliency and the role of self-efficacy across disparate groups. An online survey captured responses from nearly 200 student participants including demographic information. Preliminary findings show that females are equally likely to pursue hands-on careers as their male counterparts. In addition, there is no difference between the self-efficacy and resiliency of underrepresented minority groups against the majority racial group. The results from this study aim to dispel traditional notions such as math anxiety regarding female and minorities in STEM field. Moreover, it highlights common student characteristics from which recruiters can use to encourage future students to enter these careers.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Ahmed, W. (2018). Developmental trajectories of math anxiety during adolescence: Associations with STEM career choice. Journal of adolescence, 67, 158-166.
American Society of Engineering Education. (2019). Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2108. Retrieved from https://ira.asee.org/by-the-numbers/.
Awasthi, D., & Imam, A. (2016). A Study of Mathematics Anxiety among Secondary School Students in Relation to Gender and Mathematics Achievement. Global Journal For Research Analysis, 4(10).
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248-287.
Berch, D. B., & Mazzocco, M. M. (2007). Why is math so hard for some children. The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Betz, N. E. (2007). Career self-efficacy: Exemplary recent research and emerging directions. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(4), 403-422.
Briggs, C. (2017). The policy of STEM diversity: Diversifying STEM programs in higher education. Journal of STEM Education, 17(4).
Bui, K. V. T. (2002). First-generation college students at a four-year university: Background characteristics, reasons for pursuing higher education, and first-year experiences. College Student Journal, 36(1), 3-12.
Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304-328.
Cataldo, L. (2018). Changing the Perception of Construction Careers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.cfma.org/membership/content.cfm?ItemNumber=6234
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265.
Chen, Y.-H., Tau, A., Zastavker, Y. V., Stolk, J. D., Dillon, A., & Gross, M. D. (2016). Understanding students' perception of academic and professional relevance in STEM courses. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).
Distefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mîndrilă, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14, 1–11.
Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M.-T. (2015). What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development.
Else-Quest, N. M., Mineo, C. C., & Higgins, A. (2013). Math and Science Attitudes and Achievement at the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 293–309.
Fike, D. S., & Fike, R. (2008). Predictors of first-year student retention in the community college. Community College Review, 36(2), 68-88.
Francis, V., & Prosser, A. (2014). Exploring vocational guidance and gender in construction. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 10(1), 39-57.
Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2009). Reliability of summed item scores using structural equation modeling: An alternative to coefficient alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 155–167.
Haeger, H., & Fresquez, C. (2016). Mentoring for inclusion: The impact of mentoring on undergraduate researchers in the sciences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar36.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling : Guidelines for Determining Model Fit Structural equation modelling : guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
Inman, W. E., & Mayes, L. (1999). The importance of being first: Unique characteristics of first generation community college students. Community College Review, 26(4), 3-22.
Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
Koch, D. C., Greenan, J., & Newton, K. (2009). Factors that influence students’ choice of careers in construction management. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 5, 293–307.
Lucietto, A. M. (2017). Engineering Technology Students – How do they compare to other STEM students? Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH.
Lucietto, A. M., & Leach, S. (2017). Comparing Main Campus Engineering Technology Students to Those at Remote Sites. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH.
MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. S. (2013). Academic self-efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 347-369.
Maddux, J. E. (2016). Self-efficacy. In Interpersonal and intrapersonal expectancies (pp. 41-46): Routledge.
Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children's gender-science stereotypes: a meta-analysis of 5 decades of US draw-a-scientist studies. Child development, 89(6), 1943-1955.
Moore, J. D., & Gloeckner, G. W. (2007). A theory of women’s career choice in construction management: Recommendations for academia. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 3, 123–139.
Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168.
National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: National Academies Press.
Oo, B. L., Li, S., & Zhang, L. (2018). Understanding Female Students ’ Choice of a Construction Management Undergraduate Degree Program : Case Study at an Australian University. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144, 1–8.
Rancer, A. S., Durbin, J. M., & Lin, Y. (2013). Teaching Communication Research Methods: Student Perceptions of Topic Difficulty, Topic Understanding, and Their Relationship with Math Anxiety. Communication Research Reports, 30(3), 242-251.
Reichert, M., & Absher, M. (1998). Graduate engineering education of underrepresented populations. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(3), 257-267.
Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006). “Math is Hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 428-436.
Wang, M. Te, Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not Lack of Ability but More Choice: Individual and Gender Differences in Choice of Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Psychological Science, 24, 770–775.
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140.
Willelt, L. H. (1989). Are two-year college students first-generation college students? Community College Review, 17(2), 48-52.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020: Safety, Workforce, and Education
Pages: 697 - 707
Editors: Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., Arizona State University, David Grau, Ph.D., Arizona State University, and Pingbo Tang, Ph.D., Arizona State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8287-2

History

Published online: Nov 9, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anthony E. Sparkling, Ph.D. [email protected]
School of Construction Management Technology, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN. E-mail: [email protected]
Anne M. Lucietto, Ph.D. [email protected]
School of Engineering Technology, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$180.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$180.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share