Construction Research Congress 2020
Incident-Induced Congestion and Truck Diversion Strategies Evaluation: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2020: Safety, Workforce, and Education
ABSTRACT
Increased urbanization, population growth, and economic development within the United States have led to an increased demand for freight travel to meet the needs of individuals and businesses. Consequently, freight transportation has grown significantly over time and has expanded beyond the capacity of the infrastructure systems, which has caused increased challenges in many regions. Trucks are the principal mode of freight transportation and are expected to increase in both value and tonnage. Traffic congestion has impacted the trucking industry and has caused a significant loss of productivity, which costs around 63 billion dollars annually. In order to maintain quality of life and enhance public safety, there is a growing need to dedicate more effort to investigating and planning traffic management, and to assessing the impact of trucks on the highway systems. Traffic diversion strategies can be implemented to mitigate the congested facilities by diverting traffic to potential alternate routes. Therefore, truck diversion decisions should be carefully managed in order to improve the safety and efficiency of the overall network system. The majority of previous studies focused on enhancing the traffic operation of passenger vehicles, rather than that of trucks. Additionally, the consideration of alternate route selection criteria has been limited. There is, therefore, a lack in the attention that has been paid to evaluating and assessing the impact of truck diversion on the performance of the selected routes. This paper presents a review of the incident-induced congestion problem and traffic diversion strategies in recent years. Furthermore, it identifies future challenges and concludes with recommendations for the future application of such strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Aden, D., & Nageli, n. (1999). Corsim evaluation of incident diversion signal timing plans. In proceedings of 6th world congress on intelligent transport systems
Aleksandr, N., Vladimir, Z., & Anastasiya, F. lova. (2018). Dynamic traffic re-routing as a method of reducing the congestion level of road network elements, 1, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes16-15289
Antoniou, C., Koutsopoulos, H. N., Ben-Akiva, M., & Chauhan, A. S. (2011). Evaluation of diversion strategies using dynamic traffic assignment. Transportation Planning and Technology, 34(3), 199–216.
Aved, A., Do, T., Hamza-Lup, G., Hua Ho, A., Hoang, L., Hsia, L., Peng, R. (2007). A Real-Time route diversion Management System. IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC, 1131–1136. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2007.4357659
Backfrieder, C., Ostermayer, G., & Mecklenbräuker, C. F. (2014). TraffSim-A Traffic Simulator for Investigations of Congestion Minimization through Dynamic Vehicle Rerouting. International Journal of Simulation -- Systems, Science & Technology EBSCO. https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.15.04.05
Braekers, K., Ramaekers, K., & Van Nieuwenhuyse, I. (2016). The vehicle routing problem: State of the art classification and review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.12.007
Cragg, C. A., & Demetsky, M. J. (1995). Simulation analysis of route diversion strategies for freeway incident management : final report. Council, Virginia Transportation Research. Retrieved from https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/12575
Dunn, W. M., & Jr., Robert A. Reiss, and S. P. L (1999). Synthesis of Highway Practice Roadway Incident Diversion Practices. Transportation Research Board.
Eksioglu, B., Volkan Vural, A., & Reisman, A. (2009). The vehicle routing problem: A taxonomic review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 1472–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.05.009
Federal Highway Administration. (2006). Alternate Route Handbook.
Güner, A. R., Murat, A., & Chinnam, R. B. (2012). Dynamic routing under recurrent and non-recurrent congestion using real-time ITS information. Computers and Operations Research, 39(2), 358–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.04.012
Hu, Wang, Chu, Lee. (2005). Value of traffic information for route diversion control scheme under traffic incidents. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. Retrieved from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/easts/6/0/6_0_2487/_pdf
Juan Pan, S., Sandu Popa, I., Borcea, C., Juan, S., & Pan, J. (2017). DIVERT: A Distributed Vehicular Traffic Re-Routing System for Congestion Avoidance. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2016.2538226ï
Li, X., & Khattak, A. J. (2018). Large-scale incident-induced congestion: en-route diversions of commercial and non-commercial traffic under connected and automated vehicles. Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference. Retrieved from https://www.informs-sim.org/wsc18papers/includes/files/094.pdf
Liu, Y., Kim, W., & Chang, G.-L. (2013). Decision Model for Justifying the Benefits of Detour Operation under Non-Recurrent Congestion. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139(1), 40–49.
Luo, L., Ge, Y.-E., Zhang, F., & Ban, X. (Jeff). (2016). Real-time route diversion control in a model predictive control framework with multiple objectives: Traffic efficiency, emission reduction and fuel economy. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 48, 332–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2016.08.013
Murray, D. (2015). An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking: 2015 Update. Retrieved from www.atri-online.org
Pan, J., Popa, I. S., Zeitouni, K., & Borcea, C. (2013). Proactive Vehicular Traffic Rerouting for Lower Travel Time. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62(8), 3551–3568. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2013.2260422
Pell, A., Meingast, A., & Schauer, O. (2017). Trends in Real-time Traffic Simulation. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.175
Schrank, D., Lomax, T., Fellow, R., Bak, J., & Analyst, R. (2015). 2015 URBAN MOBILITY SCORECARD. Retrieved from https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility-scorecard-2015.pdf
Spiliopoulou, A., Kontorinaki, M., Papamichail, I., & Papageorgiou, M. (2013). Real-time route diversion control at congested motorway off-ramp areas - Part I: User-optimum route guidance. In 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013) (pp. 2119–2125). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728542
Wang, Y., Szeto, W. Y., Han, K., & Friesz, T. L. (2018). Dynamic traffic assignment: A review of the methodological advances for environmentally sustainable road transportation applications. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Construction Research Congress 2020: Safety, Workforce, and Education
Pages: 616 - 624
Editors: Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., Arizona State University, David Grau, Ph.D., Arizona State University, and Pingbo Tang, Ph.D., Arizona State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8287-2
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Nov 9, 2020
Published in print: Nov 9, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.