Geo-Congress 2020
Nonlinear Deformation Analyses of Embankments on a Spatially Variable Liquefiable Deposit Modeled Using Conditional Random Fields
Publication: Geo-Congress 2020: Engineering, Monitoring, and Management of Geotechnical Infrastructure (GSP 316)
ABSTRACT
Seismic evaluations of embankment dams and levees often involve synthesis and idealization of site investigation data in a simplified spatial structure with equivalent uniform properties assigned to each soil layer or category. The process of assigning equivalent single property values to entire soil layers and categories significantly simplifies the detailed information obtained during the site investigation. This study examines the potential benefits of incorporating the spatial variability of liquefiable soils captured in site investigation data into nonlinear deformation analyses (NDAs) of embankment dams using conditional random fields. Parent models (PMs) are analyzed using unconditional random fields to represent “true” subsurface conditions of a spatially variable, liquefiable soil layer under different size embankments. From each parent model, single continuous columns of soil data are extracted and used to simulate data obtained during site investigations. Conditional embankment models are created using random fields conditioned on the simulated site investigation data to represent possible subsurface conditions. Deformations obtained from sets of conditional model NDAs are compared to those obtained from their parent model NDAs for different embankment sizes and scales of fluctuation to examine the deformation prediction ability of the conditional models.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work described herein progressed under projects for the California Division of Safety of Dams under Contract 4600009523, the Department of Water Resources under Contract 4600009751, and the National Science Foundation under grant CMMI-1635398. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of these organizations. The authors appreciate the above support.
REFERENCES
Ancheta, T. D., Darragh, R. B., Stewart, J. P., Seyhan, E., Silva, W. J., Chiou, B. S. J., et al. (2014). NGA-West2 database. Earthquake Spectra EERI 2014; 30:(3)989-1005.
Baecher, G. B., and Ingra, T. S., (1981). “Stochastic FEM in settlement predictions.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 107(4), 449-464.
Boulanger, R. W., and Beaty, M. H., (2016). “Seismic Deformation Analyses of Embankment Dams: A Reviewer’s Checklist”, In Proc., 36th USSD Annual Meeting and Conference, United States Society on Dams, 2016. 535-546.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2012). “Probabilistic SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engrg, ASCE, 138(10), 1185-1195.
Boulanger, R. W., and Montgomery, J. (2016). “Nonlinear deformation analyses of an embankment dam on a spatially variable liquefiable deposit.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 91, 222–233.
Boulanger, R. W., and Ziotopoulou, K. (2018). "PM4Sand (Version 3.1): A sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications." Report No. UCD/CGM-17/01, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, University of California, Davis, CA.
Fenton, G. A., and Griffiths, D. V. (2008). Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Itasca (2016). Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (FLAC), release 8.0. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis, MN.
Mejia, K. H., and Dawson, E. M. (2006). “4th International Symposium on Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics.” Minneapolis, MN.
Montgomery, J., Boulanger, R. W., Armstrong, R. J., and Malvick, E. J. (2014). “Anisotropic Undrained Shear Strength Parameters for Nonlinear Deformation Analyses of Embankment Dams.” Geo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers.
Paull, N. A., Boulanger, R. W., and DeJong, J. T., (2019). “Seismic deformations of different size embankments on a spatially variable liquefiable deposit”, In Proc., 39th USSD Annual Meeting and Conference, United States Society on Dams.
Vanmarcke, E. (2010). Random fields: analysis and synthesis. World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ.
Ziotopoulou, K., & Boulanger, R. W. (2016). "Plasticity modeling of liquefaction effects under sloping ground and irregular cyclic loading conditions." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 84 (2016), 269-283,.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Geo-Congress 2020: Engineering, Monitoring, and Management of Geotechnical Infrastructure (GSP 316)
Pages: 1 - 9
Editors: James P. Hambleton, Ph.D., Northwestern University, Roman Makhnenko, Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Aaron S. Budge, Ph.D., Minnesota State University, Mankato
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8279-7
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Feb 21, 2020
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Continuum mechanics
- Dams
- Data analysis
- Deformation (mechanics)
- Embankment dams
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Field tests
- Geomechanics
- Geometry
- Geotechnical engineering
- Geotechnical investigation
- Mathematics
- Methodology (by type)
- Research methods (by type)
- Site investigation
- Soil analysis
- Soil deformation
- Soil mechanics
- Soil properties
- Solid mechanics
- Spatial variability
- Structural mechanics
- Tests (by type)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.