International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019
An Analysis of Attributes of Electric Vehicle Owners’ Travel and Purchasing Behavior: The Case of Maryland
Publication: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019: Innovation and Sustainability in Smart Mobility and Smart Cities
ABSTRACT
An emerging technology in transportation, electric vehicles (EVs) decrease reliance on pollutant fuels and bring numerous environmental benefits. The current research investigated the socio-demographic attributes that may contribute to EV ownership and owners’ purchasing behavior. The goal of this study is providing public policies and recommendations to decision makers to prompt equitable EV usage by identifying influencing socio-demographic attributes of EV purchasing behavior. This study surveyed registered plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) and battery electric vehicle (BEV) owners in Maryland from May 28, 2015, to February 19, 2016. In total, 1,257 EV owners in Maryland completed usable surveys. A set of statistical analysis methods was employed to analyze the data. Researchers constructed a multinomial logistic model (MNL) to examine the associations between EV owner characteristics and their reasons for purchasing/leasing the EV, and an analysis of variance test (ANOVA) was carried out to explore possible relationships between EV owners’ travel behavior and their socio-demographic features. Findings suggest that, first, age, education, income, household size, number of vehicles in the household, marital status, and political affiliation play a significant role in preferences attributes of participants for purchasing/leasing an EV. Second, environmental issues are the main reason for purchasing/leasing EVs, but the EV owners who had longer commutes were more concerned about the price and status of the EV owner and efficiency and performance than were those with shorter commutes. Third, EV owners who are older and more educated, drive less than other groups.
Get full access to this chapter
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank the Mid-Atlantic Transportation Sustainability University Transportation Center, led by the University of Virginia, and the U.S. Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program for their financial support of this research. The authors also thank the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration for their cooperation with the survey of electric vehicle owners.
REFERENCES
Achtnicht, M., Bühler, G., & Hermeling, C. (2012). The impact of fuel availability on demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(3), 262-269.
American Community Survey. (2015). Economic Characteristics. Retrieved from U.S. Census Bureau:
Bjerkan, K. Y., Nørbech, T. E., & Nordtømme, M. E. (2016). Incentives for promoting battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 43, 169-180.
Carley, S., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., & Graham, J. D. (2013). Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 18, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.09.007
Clinton, B., Brown, A., Davidson, C., & Steinberg, D. (2015). Impact of direct financial incentives in the emerging battery electric vehicle market: A preliminary analysis. Retrieved from
Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2013). Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 680-702.
Farkas, A., Shin, H.-S., & Nickkar, A. (2018). Environmental and Safety Attributes of Electric Vehicle Ownership and Commuting Behavior: Public Policy and Equity Considerations. Mid-Atlantic Transportation Sustainability University Transportation Center University of Virginia.
Glerum, A., Stankovikj, L., Thémans, M., & Bierlaire, M. (2013). Forecasting the demand for electric vehicles: accounting for attitudes and perceptions. Transportation Science, 48(4), 483-499.
Hackbarth, A., & Madlener, R. (2013). Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: A discrete choice analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 5-17.
Helveston, J. P., Liu, Y., Feit, E. M., Fuchs, E., Klampfl, E., & Michalek, J. J. (2015). Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the US and China. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 73, 96-112.
Hess, S., Fowler, M., Adler, T., & Bahreinian, A. (2012). A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study. Transportation, 39(3), 593-625.
Hidrue, M. K., Parsons, G. R., Kempton, W., & Gardner, M. P. (2011). Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resource and energy economics, 33(3), 686-705.
Hoen, A., & Koetse, M. J. (2014). A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 61, 199-215.
Internal Revenue Service. (2017). Plug-In Electric Drive Vehicle Credit (IRC 30D). Retrieved from Internal Revenue Service, [Online] Accessible at : https://www.irs.gov/businesses/plug-in-electric-vehicle-credit-irc-30-and-irc-30d:
Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24-32.
Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes: Application to intended purchase of electric cars. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 69, 71-85.
Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076
Liao, F., Molin, E., & van Wee, B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 252-275.
Maryland Department of the Environment. (2017). Maryland Clean Air 2017 Progress Report. Retrieved from Maryland Department of the Environment: http://mde.maryland.gov/programs/Air/Documents/MDCleanAirProgress2017.pdf
Maryland Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Council. (2017). Interim report to the governor and Maryland general assembly. Retrieved from Maryland Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Council, Maryland Department of Transportation, Hanover
Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration. (2017). Titling-Excise tas credit for plug-in electric vehicles. Retrieved from Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration, Accessible at : http://www.mva.maryland.gov/about-mva/info/27300/27300-71T.htm:
Mau, P., Eyzaguirre, J., Jaccard, M., Collins-Dodd, C., & Tiedemann, K. (2008). The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies. Ecological Economics, 68(1), 504-516.
McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior.
Momtazpour, M., Bozchalui, M. C., Ramakrishnan, N., & Sharma, R. (2016). Installing Electric Vehicle Charging Stations City-Scale: How Many and Where? Computational Sustainability (pp. 149-170): Springer.
Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3-4), 195-237.
Musti, S., & Kockelman, K. M. (2011). Evolution of the household vehicle fleet: Anticipating fleet composition, PHEV adoption and GHG emissions in Austin, Texas. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 45(8), 707-720.
Peters, A., & Dütschke, E. (2014). How do Consumers Perceive Electric Vehicles? A Comparison of German Consumer Groups. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(3), 359-377.
Plötz, P., Schneider, U., Globisch, J., & Dütschke, E. (2014). Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 67, 96-109.
Qian, L., & Soopramanien, D. (2011). Heterogeneous consumer preferences for alternative fuel cars in China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(8), 607-613.
Ramalingam, K., & Indulkar, C. S. (2015). Overview of Plug-in Electric Vehicle Technologies. In S. Rajakaruna, F. Shahnia, & A. Ghosh (Eds.), Plug In Electric Vehicles in Smart Grids: Integration Techniques(pp. 1-32). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2016). Influence of social networks on latent choice of electric cars: a mixed logit specification using experimental design data. Networks and Spatial Economics, 16(1), 99-130.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations: Simon and Schuster.
Sang, Y.-N., & Bekhet, H. A. (2015). Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: an empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 75-83.
Schneidereit, T., Franke, T., Günther, M., & Krems, J. F. (2015). Does range matter? Exploring perceptions of electric vehicles with and without a range extender among potential early adopters in Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, 198-206.
Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 48, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
Shin, H.-S., Farkas, A., & Nickkar, A. (2019). A Spatial Analysis of Commuting Trips of Electric Vehicle Drivers: The Case of Maryland. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States.
Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183-194.
Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., & Zou, B. (2011). Analyzing public awareness and acceptance of alternative fuel vehicles in China: The case of EV. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7015-7024.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019: Innovation and Sustainability in Smart Mobility and Smart Cities
Pages: 77 - 90
Editor: David A. Noyce, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin–Madison
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8258-2
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 28, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.