Pipelines 2019
Design-Build Project Administration: Case Studies from Water Utilities in the U.S. Southwest/Pacific Region
Publication: Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation
ABSTRACT
Water utilities were traditionally required to deliver their projects using the design-bid-build (DBB) method. However, innovative and more efficient project delivery methods such as design-build (DB) are growing in use in this industry. The objective of this study is to benchmark DB project administration practices in the water industry, focusing on the U.S. Southwest/Pacific region. Structured interviews were conducted with four utilities that are experienced with successful DB delivery. One utility was selected to represent each of the four following states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and Nevada. The interview questions were organized into eight different categories: procurement, roles and responsibilities, risk and quality assurance, design, design review, cost and schedule estimates, submittal and submittal review, and communication and information flow. Findings include that all four utilities engage the design-builder before 10% of design completion. This study supports utilities interested in using DB and in identifying practices to improve their DB project performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work is funded by the Water Research Foundation (WRF). The authors would also like to thank the industry collaborators for providing data on their organization’s DB project administration practices and all of the industry experts who supported this research effort through the industry workshop.
REFERENCES
Bearup, W., Kenig, M., and O’Donnell, J. (2007). “Alternative Delivery Methods, a Primer.” Proceedings. ACI-NA Project Delivery Summit II, Airport Board Members and Commissioners Annual Conference, Airports Council International-North America, Chicago, IL.
Culp, G. (2011). Alternative project delivery methods for water and wastewater projects: do they save time and money? Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), p. 231-240.
Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA). (2015). Water and wastewater sector: design-build best practices. Design-Build Institute of America. Washington, DC
Molenaar, K.R., and Songer, A.D. (1998). Model for public sector design-build project selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 124(6), p. 467–479.
Molenaar, K. R., Bogus, S. M., and Priestley, J. M. (2004). Design/build for water/wastewater facilities: state of the industry survey and three case studies. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(1), p. 16-24.
Wagner, B. (2018). Design-build growth: myths and best practices. Clark Construction. Bethesda, Maryland. Retrieved from: https://www.clarkconstruction.com/news/design-build-growth-myths-and-best-practices.
Washington State Capital Project Advisory Review Board (WSCPARB). (2017). Design-build best practices guidelines. Washington State Department of Enterprise Services. Olympia, WA.
Water Design-Build Council (WDBC). (2008). Survey of Municipal Clients on Design-Build for Water and Wastewater Systems. Water Design-Build Council. Washington, D.C.
Water Design-Build Council (2016) “Water and Wastewater Design-Build Handbook Fourth Edition.” Water Design-Build Council.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation
Pages: 468 - 476
Editors: Jeffrey W. Heidrick, Burns & McDonnell and Mark S. Mihm, HDR
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8249-0
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 18, 2019
Published in print: Jul 18, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.