Chapter
Apr 22, 2019
Structures Congress 2019

Design of Experimental Apparatus for Real-Time Wind-Tunnel Hybrid Simulation of Bridge Decks and Buildings

Publication: Structures Congress 2019: Blast, Impact Loading, and Research and Education

ABSTRACT

Due to the challenges in numerical simulation of wind-structure interaction, the dynamic response of long-span bridges or high-rise buildings subjected to wind loads has been primarily evaluated through wind tunnel tests. The wind-tunnel tests, especially aeroelastic tests, require calibration of springs, masses, and the damping properties of an experimental specimen which takes considerable time and efforts. In hybrid simulation, where a numerical model and a physical specimen are tightly integrated, a component that is difficult to be represented with a numerical model is represented experimentally, while the rest of the structural system is represented numerically. In this paper, designs of two configurations of experimental apparatus for real-time wind-tunnel hybrid simulation are presented: one for section model tests of bridge decks and another one for high-rise buildings. The experimental apparatus for section model tests, which consists of four linear motors, is for aeroelastic tests of section model of a long-span bridge. The experimental apparatus for buildings consists of two linear motors to test aeroelastic response of scaled high-rise building model. The rational on the selection of the design configurations is discussed which is followed by configuration of the experimental setup and a potential strategy for running real-time hybrid simulation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The research project is funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The equipment for the section model test apparatus is funded by Research Tools and Instruments Grant of NSERC. The building test apparatus is funded through ENGAGE Grant of NSERC in collaboration with Gradient Wind Engineering. The second and fourth authors are also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded via the Korean Government (MSIP) [Grant no. 2017R1A2B4008973].

REFERENCES

Ahmadizadeh, M., Mosqueda, G., and Reinhorn, A. M. (2008). “Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real-time hybrid structural simulation.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37(1), 21–42.
Carrion, J. E., and Spencer, B. F., Jr. (2007). Model-based Strategies for Real-time Hybrid Testing. Urbana.
Chae, Y., Kazemibidokhti, K., and Ricles, J. M. (2013). “Adaptive time series compensator for delay compensation of servo-hydraulic actuator systems for real-time hybrid simulation.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(11), 1697–1715.
Chen, C., Ricles, J. M., Marullo, T. M., and Mercan, O. (2009). “Real-time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38(1), 23–44.
Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000). “Time Domain Flutter and Buffeting Response Analysis of Bridges.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(1), 7–16.
Christenson, R., Wojtkiewicz, S., Dong, J., Lobo-Aguilar, S., and Yuan, Y. (2018). “Aeroelastic Real-Time Hybrid Simulation (AeroRTHS): Validation of Vortex Induced Vibration of a Tall Building Structure.” Engineering Mechanics Institute Conference, Boston, MA.
Combescure, D., and Pegon, P. (1997). “α-Operator splitting time integration technique for pseudodynamic testing error propagation analysis.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 16(7–8), 427–443.
Hakuno, M., Shidawara, M., and Hara, T. (1969). “Dynamic Destructive Test of a Cantilever Beam Controlled by an Analog-computer.” Transactions of Japan Society of Civil Engineering, 171(171), 1–9.
Huang, X., and Kwon, O. (n.d.). “A Generalized Numerical/Experimental Distributed Simulation Framework.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, (in review).
Jung, K., Kim, H.-K., and Lee, H. S. (2012). “Evaluation of Impulse Response Functions for Convolution Integrals of Aerodynamic Forces by Optimization with a Penalty Function.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 138(5), 519–529.
Jung, K., Kim, H.-K., and Lee, H. S. (2014). “New Unified Approach for Aeroelastic Analyses Using Approximate Transfer Functions of Aerodynamic Forces.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 140(4), 04013002.
Kanda, M., Kawaguchi, A., Koizumi, T., and Maruta, E. (2003). “A new approach for simulating aerodynamic vibrations of structures in a wind tunnel—development of an experimental system by means of hybrid vibration technique.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 91(11), 1419–1440.
Kanda, M., Maruta, E., Homma, Y., and Ueda, K. (1995). “Development of hybrid experimental system combined with random response analysis for unsteady aerodynamic vibration of structure.” Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on Wind Engineering, India, 287–298.
Karavasilis, T. L., Seo, C.-Y., and Ricles, J. M. (2008). HybridFEM User’s Manual: A Program for Dynamic Time Hisotry Analysis of 2D Inelastic Frame Structures and Real-Time Hybrid Simulation. Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Kato, Y., and Kanda, M. (2014). “Development of a modified hybrid aerodynamic vibration technique for simulating aerodynamic vibration of structures in a wind tunnel.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Elsevier, 135, 10–21.
Kwon, O.-S., Elnashai, A., and Spencer, B. (2008). “A framework for distributed analytical and hybrid simulations.” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 30(3), 331–350.
Park, J., Jung, K., Hong, Y. H., Kim, H.-K., and Lee, H. S. (2014). “Exact Enforcement of the Causality Condition on the Aerodynamic Impulse Response Function Using a Truncated Fourier Series.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 140(5), 04014017.
Scanlan, R. H., and Tomko, J. J. (1971). “Airfoil and Bridge Deck Flutter Derivatives.” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 97(6), 1717–1737.
Schellenberg, A., Mahin, S. a., and Fenves, G. L. (2007). “A Software Framework for Hybrid Simulation of Large Structural Systems.” Structural Engineering Research Frontiers, 1–16.
Siedziako, B., Øiseth, O., and Rønnquist, A. (2017). “An enhanced forced vibration rig for wind tunnel testing of bridge deck section models in arbitrary motion.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 164, 152–163.
Wang, X., Kim, R. E., Kwon, O.-S., and Yeo, I. (2018). “Hybrid Simulation Method for a Structure Subjected to Fire and Its Application to a Steel Frame.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(8), 04018118.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Structures Congress 2019
Structures Congress 2019: Blast, Impact Loading, and Research and Education
Pages: 235 - 245
Editor: James Gregory Soules, McDermott International
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8224-7

History

Published online: Apr 22, 2019
Published in print: Apr 22, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Oh-Sung Kwon, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.Eng.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S-1A4, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Ho-Kyung Kim, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
POSCO Chair Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National Univ., Seoul 08826, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Un Yong Jeong, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.Eng.
Principal, Gradient Wind Engineering Inc., Ottawa K0A-1L0, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
You-Chan Hwang [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National Univ., Seoul 08826, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Moniruzzaman Moni [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S-1A4, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share