Chapter
Apr 22, 2019
Structures Congress 2019

Non-Stationary Characteristics of Tornadoes and Induced Dynamic Impact on a Large-Span Dome Structure

Publication: Structures Congress 2019: Bridges, Nonbuilding and Special Structures, and Nonstructural Components

ABSTRACT

Tornadoes may be one of the most destructive natural disasters. They cause about 10 billion dollars in damage and kill 70 people on average annually in the United States. Effects of tornadoes on civil structures have been widely studied. However, the research on their dynamic impact has been lacking. In this study, non-stationary characteristics of tornadoes are investigated, and then their dynamic impact on a dome structure is determined. Computational fluid dynamics simulations are applied to characterize tornado-induced time-variant wind pressure on the dome surface, which is then mapped onto the finite element model of the dome structure. Next, transient time-history analyses are conducted to explore tornado-induced dynamic responses. Numerical results show that wind pressure becomes non-stationary and the induced dynamic responses are significant when the core radius of the tornado translates to the dome edge. More severe dynamic impact is observed when the tornado first approaches the dome structure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by National Science Foundation, the Hazard Mitigation and Structural Engineering program, through the project of “Damage and Instability Detection of Civil Large-scale Space Structures under Operational and Multi-hazard Environments” [award number 1455709].

REFERENCES

Ahmad, S., Ansari, E., and Gupta, H. (2014). “Dynamic Response of Plane Frame Buildings Subjected to Tornado Loads.” J. Mech. Civil Eng., 2320-334X, 63-69.
ANSYS (2013). One-Way Fluid-Structure-Interaction enhanced by ACT. ANSYS, Inc.
Chang, C. C. (1966). “First real man made tornado is generated in laboratory cage by space scientists at the catholic University of America”. News item of PI of CUA.
Chang, C. C. (1971). “What we learned from the tornado of Lubbock, Texas, USA, May 11, 1970.” Proc., the 3rdInt. Conf. on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, Tokyo, Japan, 471-480.
Davies-Jones, R., Trapp, R.J., and Bluestein, H.B. (2001). “Tornadoes and tornadic storms.” Proc., Severe convective storms. American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, 167-221.
Dutta, P. K., Ghosh, A. K., and Agarwal, B. L. (2002). “Dynamic response of structures subjected to tornado loads by FEM.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 90(1), 55-69.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2012) Spring 2011 tornadoes: April 25–28 and May 22, Building performance observations, recommendations, and technical guidance. Mitigation Assessment Team Report, FEMA P-908, 512.
Haan, F. L., Sarkar, P. P., and Gallus, W. A. (2008). “Design, construction and performance of a large tornado simulator for wind engineering applications.” Eng. Struct., 30(4), 1146-1159.
Haan Jr, F. L., Balaramudu, V. K., and Sarkar, P. P. (2009). “Tornado-induced wind loads on a low-rise building.” J. Struct. Eng, 136(1), 106-116.
Hu, H., Yang, Z., Sarkar, P., and Haan, F. (2011). “Characterization of the wind loads and flow fields around a gable-roof building model in tornado-like winds.” Exp. Fluids, 51(3), 835-851.
Ishihara, T., Oh, S., and Tokuyama, Y. (2011). “Numerical study on flow fields of tornado-like vortices using the LES turbulence model.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 99(4), 239-248.
Kosiba, K., and Wurman, J. (2010). “The three-dimensional axisymmetric wind field structure of the Spencer, South Dakota, 1998 tornado.” J. Atmos. Sci., 67(9), 3074-3083.
Kuai, L., Haan Jr, F. L., Gallus Jr, W. A., and Sarkar, P. P. (2008). “CFD simulations of the flow field of a laboratory-simulated tornado for parameter sensitivity studies and comparison with field measurements.” Wind and Structures, 11(2), 75-96.
Lott, N., Smith, A., Houston, T., Shein, K., and Crouch, J. (2012). Billion dollar US weather/climate disasters, National Climatic Data Center, 1980-2011.
Mishra, A. R., James, D. L., and Letchford, C. W. (2008a). “Physical simulation of a single-celled tornado-like vortex, Part A: Flow field characterization.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 96(8), 1243-1257.
Mishra, A. R., James, D. L., and Letchford, C. W. (2008b). “Physical simulation of a single-celled tornado-like vortex, Part B: Wind loading on a cubical model.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 96(8), 1258-1273.
Natarajan, D., and Hangan, H. (2012). “Large eddy simulations of translation and surface roughness effects on tornado-like vortices.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 104, 577-584.
Pan, Y. and Xiao, Y. (2013). “CFD numerical simulation of tornado wind field and wind loads on structures.” M.S. thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, China.
Rajasekharan, S. G., Matsui, M., and Tamura, Y. (2013). “Characteristics of internal pressures and net local roof wind forces on a building exposed to a tornado-like vortex.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 112, 52-57.
Sabareesh, G. R., Matsui, M., and Tamura, Y. (2013). “Ground roughness effects on internal pressure characteristics for buildings exposed to tornado-like flow.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 122, 113-117.
Selvam, R. P., and Millett, P. C. (2003). “Computer modeling of tornado forces on a cubic building using large eddy simulation.” J. Ark. Acad. Sci, 57, 140-146.
Sengupta, A., Haan, F. L., Sarkar, P. P., and Balaramudu, V. (2008). “Transient loads on buildings in microburst and tornado winds.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 96(10), 2173-2187.
Snow, J.T., Church, C.R., Barnhart, B.J. (1980). “An investigation of the surface pressure fields beneath simulated tornado cyclones.” J. Atmos. Sci., 37(5), 1013-1026.
Wen, Y. K. (1975). “Dynamic tornadic wind loads on tall buildings.” J. Struct. Division, 101(1), 169-185.
Wurman, J., Kosiba, K., and Robinson, P. (2013). “In situ, Doppler radar, and video observations of the interior structure of a tornado and the wind-damage relationship.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94(6), 835-846.
Wurman, J., and Alexander, C. R. (2005). “The 30 May 1998 Spencer, South Dakota, storm. Part II: Comparison of observed damage and radar-derived winds in the tornadoes.” Mon. Weather Rev., 133(1), 97-119.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Structures Congress 2019
Structures Congress 2019: Bridges, Nonbuilding and Special Structures, and Nonstructural Components
Pages: 361 - 372
Editor: James Gregory Soules, McDermott International
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8223-0

History

Published online: Apr 22, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tiantian Li [email protected]
Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. E-mail: [email protected]
Guirong Yan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. E-mail: [email protected]
Fangping Yuan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. E-mail: [email protected]
Genda Chen, F.ASCE [email protected]
Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$84.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$84.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share