Structures Congress 2019
Rethinking Treatment of Irreparability in the Context of Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering
Publication: Structures Congress 2019: Buildings and Natural Disasters
ABSTRACT
FEMA P-58 is comprehensive performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) loss estimation framework which incorporates a three-module Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) procedure to assess the seismic performance of buildings. Although the framework is component-based—it accumulates damage from all building components to estimate the building-level losses, each simulation first checks for two system—or building-level damage states, namely, collapse and irreparability. The current version of FEMA P-58 estimates irreparability solely based on the residual drift of the building, but in reality an impacted building may be condemned for demolition depending on a variety of factors which include structural, strategic, and financial decision variables. In order to overcome the observed shortcomings, a revised loss assessment framework is proposed in this paper. Thereafter, two illustrative examples are presented whereby the vulnerability functions for two select building types are assessed and compared using the proposed new method and the FEMA P-58 approach. The analysis results show that the inclusion of the FEMA P-58 irreparability model often results in overestimation of direct building losses.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All results and findings are the opinion of the authors and do not reflect the views of AIG or RESA (Risk Engineering and System Analytics) Center at Clemson University.
REFERENCES
ASCE. (2010). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. Reston, VA.
ATC-38. (2000). Database on the performance of structures near strong-motion recordings: 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Redwood City, CA.
FEMA. (2012). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings - methodology. FEMA P-58-1.
FEMA 366. (2017). “HAZUS MH 99 Estimated Annualized Earthquake Losses for the United States.” (April), 66pp.
Haselton, C. B., Goulet, C. A., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Beck, J. L., Deierlein, G. G., Porter, K. A., Stewart, J. P., and Taciroglu, E. (2008). An assessment to benchmark the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced concrete moment-frame building. Peer report, Berkeley.
Kim, J. J., Elwood, K. J., Marquis, F., and Chang, S. E. (2017). “Factors influencing post-earthquake decisions on buildings in Christchurch, New Zealand.” Earthquake Spectra, 33(2), 623–640.
Pang, W., and Shirazi Hassanzadeh, S. M. (2013). “Corotational Model for Cyclic Analysis of Light-Frame Wood Shear Walls and Diaphragms.” Journal of Structural Engineering/ ASCE, 139(August), 1303–1317.
PEER. (2017). “OpenSees.” <http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
Porter, K. (2009). “Cracking an open safe: more HAZUS vulnerability functions in terms of structure-independent intensity.” Earthquake Spectra, 25(3), 607–618.
Safiey, A., Ziaei, E., Gu, M., Pang, W., Rokneddin, K., and Javanbarg, M. (2018). “Influence of irreparability fragility on seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings.” Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Los Angles, USA.
Ziaei, E. (2017). “Seismic analysis of light-frame wood building with a soft-story deficiency.” Clemson University.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Structures Congress 2019: Buildings and Natural Disasters
Pages: 230 - 236
Editor: James Gregory Soules, McDermott International
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8222-3
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Apr 22, 2019
Published in print: Apr 22, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.