Eighth International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering
In Situ Investigation of False-Positive Liquefaction Sites in Christchurch, New Zealand: Palinurus Road Case History
Publication: Geo-Congress 2019: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics (GSP 308)
ABSTRACT
Over 31,000 cone penetration test (CPT) soundings collected in Christchurch, New Zealand, in the aftermath of the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence (CES) are available on the New Zealand Geotechnical Database (NZGD). This incredible dataset has allowed for detailed comparisons between observed land performance during the CES and CPT-based retrospective predictions of liquefaction triggering on an unprecedented spatial scale. Results from these comparisons indicate a significant number of “false positive” CPT-based liquefaction triggering predictions in which severe liquefaction was predicted but no, or very minor, surface manifestations of liquefaction were observed. In August of 2015, an in situ site characterization study was initiated to further investigate 31 false positive liquefaction sites in Christchurch. The testing program included: (a) seismic CPT, (b) high-resolution compression, and shear wave velocity measurements made via direct-push crosshole testing, and (c) continuous soil sampling via sonic drilling. This paper presents in situ test results from one of these case history sites (Palinurus Road), at which moderate surficial evidence of liquefaction was observed over part of the site during the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, but not over the remainder of the site. Liquefaction triggering analyses performed on 12 CPT soundings across the site were very similar, yielding liquefaction potential indices indicative of severe liquefaction across the entire site. Refined analyses including consideration for (1) site-specific fines content data, (2) partial saturation (as indicated by VP), (3) coarse-to-fine-grained soil interlayering, (4) non-liquefying crust thickness, and (5) soil microstructure are performed to attempt to reconcile the over-prediction of liquefaction severity. The over-prediction of liquefaction severity for the 2010 Darfield earthquake was reconciled as result of these adjustments; however, the over-prediction of liquefaction severity for the 2011 Christchurch earthquake was not reconciled.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grant CMMI-1547777, the N.Z. Earthquake Commission (EQC), and QuakeCoRE, a New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission-funded Centre. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. This is QuakeCoRE publication number 0328.
REFERENCES
Ahmadi, M. M., & Robertson, P. K. (2005). “Thin-layer effects on the CPT qcmeasurement.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42(5), 1302-1317.
Boulanger, R. W., & Idriss, I. M. (2015). “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142(2), 04015065.
Boulanger, R.W., Moug, D.M., Munter, S.K., Price, A.B. & DeJong, J.T. (2016). “Evaluating liquefaction in interbedded sand, silt, and clay deposits using the cone penetrometer.” Proc., from 5th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization: Jupiters Gold Coast Queensland, Australia, September 2016.
Boulanger, R.W., Khosravi, M., Cox, B.R., DeJong, J.T. (2018). “Liquefaction Evaluation for an Interbedded Soil Deposit: St. Teresa’s School, Christchurch, New Zealand,” IACGE 2018 Geotechnical and Seismic Research and Practices for Sustainability Chongquing, China, 21-22 October 2018.
Boulanger, R.W. & DeJong, J.T. (2018). “Inverse filtering procedures to correct cone penetration data for thin-layer and transition effects.” Proceedings, CPT18 – 4th International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Delft, The Netherlands.
Bradley, B. A. (2014). “Site-specific and spatially-distributed ground-motion intensity estimation in the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 61, 83-91.
Cox, B. R., McLaughlin, K. A., van Ballegooy, S., Cubrinovski, M., Boulanger, R., & Wotherspoon, L. (2017). “In-situ investigation of false-positive liquefaction sites in Christchurch, New Zealand: St. Teresa’s School Case History.” Proc., Performance-based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, PBD-III Vancouver, M. Taiebat et al., eds., ISSMGE Technical Committee TC203, paper 265.
Cox, B.R., Stolte, A.C., Stokoe, K.H. II, Wotherspoon, L.M. (2018). “A Direct-Push Crosshole Test Method for the In-Situ Evaluation of High-Resolution P- and S-wave Velocity,” ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal accepted 11 July 2018.
Cubrinovski, M., Henderson, D., & Bradley, B. (2012). “Liquefaction impacts in residential areas in the 2010-2011 Christchurch Earthquakes.” Proc., International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Tokyo, Japan, (pp. 811-824).
Cubrinovski, M., Rhodes, A., Ntritsos, N., and van Balleygooy, S., (2017). “System response of liquefiable soils.” Proc., Performance-based design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, PBD-III Vancouver, M. Taiebat et al., eds., ISSMGE Technical Committee TC203, paper 540.
Green, R. A., Cubrinovski, M., Cox, B., Wood, C., Wotherspoon, L., Bradley, B., & Maurer, B. (2014). “Select liquefaction case histories from the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence.” Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), 131-153.
Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W. (2008). Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K. (1985). “Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes.” Proc., 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering San Francisco, CA, (pp. 321-376). Balkema.
Ishihara, K., & Yoshimine, M. (1992). “Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soils and Foundations, 32(1), 173-188.
Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F., Tokida, K. I., & Yasuda, S. (1978). “A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan.” Proc., 2nd International Conference on Microzonation, Washington, DC, National Science Foundation, 885-896.
Lunne, T., Robertson, P. K. & Powell, J. J. M. (1997). “Cone penetration testing.” Geotechnical Practice. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK.
Maurer, B., Green, R., Cubrinovski, M., and Bradley, B. (2014). “Evaluation of the Liquefaction Potential Index for Assessing Liquefaction Hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 04014032.
Maurer, B.W., Green, R.A., and Taylor, O.S. (2015). “Moving towards an improved index for assessing liquefaction hazard: Lessons from historical data.” Soils and Foundations, 55, 778-787.
McLaughlin, K. (2017). “Investigation of false-positive liquefaction case history sites in Christchurch, New Zealand.” M.S. Thesis. The University of Texas at Austin.
Munter, S. K., Boulanger, R. W., Krage, C. P. & DeJong, J. T. (2017). “Evaluation of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading procedures for interbedded deposits: Cark canal in the 1999 M7.5 Kocaeli earthquake.” Proc. ASCE Geotechnical Frontiers 2017, Orlando, Florida.
New Zealand Geotechnical Database. (2016). Retrieved [21 July 2016] from https://www.nzgd.org.nz.
Robertson, P. K. (2009). “Interpretation of cone penetration tests – a unified approach.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46, 1337-1355.
Robertson, P. K. (2016). “Cone penetration (CPT)-based soil behavior type (SBT) classification system – an update.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53, 1910-1927.
Schneider, J. A. & Moss, R. E. S. (2011). “Linking cyclic stress and cyclic strain based methods for assessment of cyclic liquefaction triggering in sands.” Geotechnique Letters, 1, 31-36.
Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1982). “Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph, Oakland, California.
Tonkin + Taylor Ltd. (2013). Liquefaction vulnerability study, Report to Earthquake Commission, Tonkin + Taylor ref. 52020.0200/v1.0.
Tonkin + Taylor Ltd. (2015). Canterbury Earthquake Sequence: Increased Liquefaction Vulnerability Assessment Methodology, Chapman Tripp acting on behalf of the Earthquake Commission (EQC), Tonkin + Taylor ref. 52010.140.v1.0.
Tonkin + Taylor Ltd. (2016). Practical implications of increased liquefaction vulnerability, Chapman Tripp acting on behalf of the Earthquake Commission (EQC), Tonkin + Taylor ref. 52010.140.v2.0 0032-4-R-CPE-2016.
Van Ballegooy, S., Malan, P., Lacrosse, V., Jacka, M.E., Cubrinovski, M., Bray, J. D., O’Rourke, T.D., Crawford, S.A. & Cowan, H. (2014). “Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential Christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), 31-55.
Van Ballegooy, S., Green, R. A., Lees, J., Wentz, F. & Maurer, B. W. (2015a). “Assessment of various CPT based liquefaction severity index frameworks relative to the Ishihara (1985) H1-H2 boundary curves.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 79(B), 347-364.
Van Ballegooy, S., Wentz, F., & Boulanger, R. W. (2015b). “Evaluation of a CPT-based liquefaction procedure at regional scale.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 79, 315-334.
Van den Berg, P., de Borst, R. & Huetink, H. (1996). “An eulerean finite element model for penetration in layered soil.” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 20(12), 865-886.
Van der Linden, T.I. (2016). “Influence of multiple thin soft layers on the cone resistance in intermediate soils.” M.S. Thesis. Delft University of Technology.
Vreugdenhil, R., Davis, R. & Berrill, J. (1994). “Interpretation of cone penetration results in multi-layered soils.” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 18(9), 585–599.
Wotherspoon, L., Orense, R., Green, R., Bradley, B., Cox, B., & Wood, C. (2013). “Analysis of liquefaction characteristics at Christchurch strong motion stations.” Proc., New Zealand – Japan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction during Recent Large-Scale Earthquakes Auckland, New Zealand.
Youd, T. L. & Idriss, I. M. et al. (2001). Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(4), 297-313.
Yue, Z. Q. & Yin, J. (1999). “Layered elastic model for analysis of cone penetration testing.” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 23(8), 829-843.
Zhang, G., Robertson, P. K. & Brachman, R. W. I. (2002). “Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(5), 1168-1180.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Geo-Congress 2019: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics (GSP 308)
Pages: 436 - 451
Editors: Christopher L. Meehan, Ph.D., University of Delaware, Sanjeev Kumar, Ph.D., Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Miguel A. Pando, Ph.D., University of North Carolina Charlotte, and Joseph T. Coe, Ph.D., Temple University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8210-0
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 21, 2019
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Case studies
- Earthquake engineering
- Earthquake resistant structures
- Earthquakes
- Engineering fundamentals
- Field tests
- Geohazards
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Geotechnical investigation
- Highway and road management
- Highway transportation
- Highways and roads
- Infrastructure
- Methodology (by type)
- Research methods (by type)
- Seismic tests
- Site investigation
- Soil liquefaction
- Soil mechanics
- Soil properties
- Tests (by type)
- Transportation engineering
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.