Chapter
Dec 13, 2018
ASCE India Conference 2017

Generating Site-Specific Ground Motions for Delhi Region for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Buildings—Promoting Disaster Resilient Communities

Publication: Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies: Resilience and Sustainability of Infrastructure

ABSTRACT

In this paper, synthetic ground motions are simulated employing a physics-based simulation methodology (PyLith), for a hypothetical earthquake of Mw 7.1 along one of the most active fault near Delhi region, Mahendragarh-Dehradun Fault (MDF). Further, using the synthetics, incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is conducted on a typical six story concrete moment resisting frame building and IDA curves are constructed with residual drift ratio (%) versus spectral acceleration at fundamental period [Sa (T1, 5%)]. Furthermore, analytical fragility curves are derived for each damage state based on FEMA P-58, for determining the seismic performance of concrete frames in the event of an earthquake in the study region. The results reveal that at Sa (T1, 5%) of 1.0 g, there is an 86% and 68% probability of non-structural damage and slight structural damage respectively. Also, for Sa (T1, 5%) value of 1.5 g, there is more than 60% probability of exceedance of all damage states.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions for improving the manuscript. This is a contribution of SERB/F/2778/2016-17 project. We thank C-DAC NPSF for giving access to PARAM Yuva II Supercomputing resources to run PyLith.

REFERENCES

Aagaard, B., Kientz, S., Knepley, M., Somala, S., Strand, L., and Williams, C. (2009). PyLith User Manual, Version 1.5. 0. Pasadena, CA.
Asgarian, B., Mirtaheri, M., Samani, H. R., and Alanjari, P. (2010). “Incremental Dynamic Analysis of High-Rise Towers.” Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build., 19, 922-934.
Baker, J. W. (2015). “Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis.” Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 579-599.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). (1987a) - Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures, Dead Loads — Unit Weights of Building Materials and Stored Materials. IS 875-Part 1, Second Revision. BIS, New Delhi, India.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). (1987b) - Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures, Imposed Loads. IS 875-Part 2, Second Revision. BIS, New Delhi, India.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). (2002) Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures: General Provisions and Buildings, IS 1893-Part 1, Fifth Revision. BIS, New Delhi, India.
Bojórquez, E., and Ruiz-García, J. (2013). “Residual drift demands in moment-resisting steel frames subjected to narrow-band earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(11), 1583-1598.
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., D’Ambrisi, A., and De Stefano, M. (2009). “Fragility analysis and seismic record selection.” J. Struct. Eng., 137(3), 379-390.
Douglas, J., and Aochi, H. (2008). “A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes.” Surv. Geophys., 29(3), 187.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2012). Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Standard FEMA P 58, Volume 1-Methodology. Washington.
Hanumantha Rao, C., and Ramana, G. V. (2009). “Site specific ground response analyses at Delhi, India.” Electron J Geotech Eng, 14(D), 1-16.
Ibarra, L. F., and Krawinkler, H. (2005). Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Berkeley, CA.
Iyengar, R. N. (2000). “Seismic status of Delhi megacity.” Current Science, 78(5), 568-574.
Jayalakshmi, S., and Raghukanth, S. T. G. (2016). “Regional ground motion simulation around Delhi due to future large earthquake.” Nat Hazards, 82(3), 1479-1513.
Kamble, V. P., and Chaudhury, H. M. (1979). “Recent seismic activity in Delhi and neighborhood.” Mausam, 30, 305-312.
Mai, P. M., and Beroza, G. C. (2002). “A spatial random field model to characterize complexity in earthquake slip.” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 107(B11).
Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J., and Park, R. (1988). “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826.
Martins, L., Silva, V., Bazzurro, P., Crowley, H., and Marques, M. (2017). “Advances in the Definition of Fragility Models for the Development of Risk-Targeted Hazard Maps.” Proc., 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 16WCEE, Santiago, Chile (In-Press).
Menegotto, M., Pinto, P.E. (1973) "Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending," Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, 15-22.
Mohanty, W. K., Walling, M. Y., Nath, S. K., and Pal, I. (2007). “First order seismic microzonation of Delhi, India using geographic information system (GIS).” Nat Hazards, 40(2), 245-260.
Moussa, A. M., Christou, P., and Kyriakides, N. (2016). “The developments of the analytical fragility methods in seismic risk assessment-A review.” Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 16(3), 70-81.
NDMA (National Disaster Management Authority). (2010). Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India, NDMA, New Delhi, India.
Parvez, I. A., Vaccari, F. R. A. N. C. O., and Panza, G. F. (2004). “Site-specific microzonation study in Delhi metropolitan city by 2-D modelling of SH and P-SV waves.” Pure Appl. Geophys., 161(5), 1165-1184.
Rao, K. S., and Rathod, G. W. (2014). “Seismic microzonation of Indian megacities: a case study of NCR Delhi.” Indian Geotechnical Journal, 44(2), 132-148.
Rezaeian, S., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2010). “Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(10), 1155-1180.
Seismostruct, S. (2004). “A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures." <http://www.seismosoft.com> (Jul. 16, 2017).
Tesfamariam, S., and Goda, K. (2015). “Seismic Performance Evaluation Framework Considering Maximum and Residual Inter-Story Drift Ratios: Application to Non-Code Conforming Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Victoria, BC, Canada.” Frontiers in Built Environment, 1, 18.
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies
Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies: Resilience and Sustainability of Infrastructure
Pages: 290 - 299
Editors: Udai P. Singh and G. L. Sivakumar Babu, Indian Institute of Science
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8203-2

History

Published online: Dec 13, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M. C. Raghucharan, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Kandi, Sangareddy 502285, Telangana, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Surendra Nadh Somala, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Kandi, Sangareddy 502285, Telangana, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$140.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$140.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share