Pipelines 2018
Results of a Full-Scale Fault-Offset Test on a Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Pipe
Publication: Pipelines 2018: Utility Engineering, Surveying, and Multidisciplinary Topics
ABSTRACT
Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) pipe is increasingly being used as a corrosion resistant alternative to steel for distribution pipelines. Since these may be subject to flexural stress caused by ground movement, this study examines the response of GFRP pipe to permanent ground deformation and the failure mechanisms exhibited. A 6 m GFRP pipe segment was buried in dense olivine sand in a moveable split box able to simulate a 90° normal fault line. The segment was buried 1.2 m deep and subjected to fault offset of 120 mm. Point data was gathered at locations of maximum curvature using strain gauges to corroborate continuous fiber optical strain data taken lengthwise along the crown and invert. Fiber data corroborated strain gauge data where they coincided although fibers were ineffective after exceeding 8000 micro strain. Strain data initially showed little sign of material failure in the pipe, but upon further analysis fiber data showed that as fault offset increased, the strain increase between reading intervals increased at the maximum tension point. Immediately after excavation the segment showed little sign of physical damage aside from some residual deformation. Then weeks after excavation the segment recovered its original shape and cracking had become visible around the point of peak curvature.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Almahakeri, Mohamed, Amir Fam, and Ian D. Moore. 2013. “Longitudinal Bending and Failure of GFRP Pipes Buried in Dense Sand under Relative Ground Movement.” Journal of Composites for Construction 17(October): 121016202111008.
CEPA. 2016. 2016 Pipeline Industry Performance Report. http://www.cepa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/16-CEPA-0010_PerformanceReport_2016_EN_low.pdf.
Ha, Da et al. 2010. “Earthquake Faulting Effects on Buried Pipelines – Case History and Centrifuge Study.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering14(5): 646–69.
Jalali, Himan Hojat, Fayaz Rahimzadeh Rofooei, Nader Khajeh Ahmad Attari, and Masoud Samadian. 2016. “Experimental and Finite Element Study of the Reverse Faulting Effects on Buried Continuous Steel Gas Pipelines.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 86: 1–14. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0267726116300100.
Karamitros, Dimitrios K., George D. Bouckovalas, and George P. Kouretzis. 2007. “Stress Analysis of Buried Steel Pipelines at Strike-Slip Fault Crossings.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27(3): 200–211.
Karamitros, Dimitrios K., George D. Bouckovalas, George P. Kouretzis, and V. Gkesouli. 2011. “An Analytical Method for Strength Verification of Buried Steel Pipelines at Normal Fault Crossings.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 31(11): 1452–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.012.
Murray, Carrie, and Richard Guthrie. 2016. 16tan North Saskatchewan River Crossing-Geotechnical Investigation Report.
Ni, Pengpeng. 2016. “Nonlinear Soil-Structure Interaction for Buried.” Queen’s University.
Poon, Eric. 2015. “Vitrified Clay Pipe Joint Behaviour Under Differential Ground Movement.” Queen’s University.
Rousseau, J., D. Perreux, and N. Verdière. 1999. “The Influence of Winding Patterns on the Damage Behaviour of Filament-Wound Pipes.” Composites Science and Technology 59(9): 1439–49.
Saiyar, M Ã, W.A. Take, and Ian D. Moore. 2011. “Validation of Boundary PIV Measurements of Soil–pipe Interaction.” International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 11(1): 23–32. http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/content/article/10.1680/ijpmg.2011.11.1.23.
Tognon, Andrew R., R. Kerry Rowe, and Richard W I Brachman. 1999. “Evaluation of Side Wall Friction for a Buried Pipe Testing Facility.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes 17(4): 193–212.
Wang, Bin, Xin Li, and Jing Zhou. 2011. “Strain Analysis of Buried Steel Pipelines across Strike-Slip Faults.” Journal of Central South University of Technology 18(5): 1654–61. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11771-011-0885-1.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Pipelines 2018: Utility Engineering, Surveying, and Multidisciplinary Topics
Pages: 93 - 102
Editors: Christopher C. Macey, AECOM and Jason S. Lueke, Ph.D., Associated Engineering
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8166-0
Copyright
© 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 11, 2018
Published in print: Jul 12, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.