Pipelines 2018
Consequence of Failure of Sewers (COFS) Model for Risk-Based Asset Management Using Analytical Hierarchy Process
Publication: Pipelines 2018: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation
ABSTRACT
The deterioration and subsequent failure of sewer pipes impacts the community, the environment, and has significant economic consequences for utility owners. As a result, it is vital that sewer utilities have a robust methodology that accurately assesses the consequences of sewer pipe failure. The aim of this paper is to present a consequence of failure of sewers (COFS) model that uses a weighted sum multicriteria decision making method based on sewer expert opinion to assess the economic, social, and environmental consequences of sewer pipe failure. The first part of this paper briefly reviews methods used in practice to assess the consequence of failure (CoF) of sewer pipes. The proposed methodology is presented next, where the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is used to develop the COFS model by incorporating a series of internal and external pipe factors. When incorporated with probability of sewer pipe failures, the COFS model is useful in determining the risk of sewer pipe failures to budget and prioritize maintenance actions more efficiently. The final part of the paper presents a short example where the model was applied to a 54-inch diameter reinforced concrete sewer pipe segment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). (2017). 2017 Infrastructure Report Card. Reston, VA. <https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org> (Dec. 14, 2017)
Kleiner, Y., and Rajani, B. (2001a). “Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: statistical models”. Urban Water, 3.
Kleiner, Y., and Rajani, B. (2001b). “Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: physically based models”. Urban Water, 3(3), 151–164.
Liu, Z., Kleiner, Y., Rajani, B., Wang, L., and Condit, W. (2012). “Condition assessment technologies for water transmission and distribution systems”. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 108.
Murphy, C. K. (1993). “Limits on the analytic hierarchy process from its consistency index”. European Journal of Operational Research, 65(1), 138–139.
NASSCO (National Association of Sewer Service Companies). (2007). NASSCO’s Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program Manual.
Nishiyama, M., and Filion, Y. (2013). “Review of statistical water main break prediction models”. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40(10), 972–979.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Shanmuganathan, M., and Karthikeyan, R. (2016). Limitations of AHP as Applied to Requirements Prioritization. Artificial Intelligent Systems and Machine Learning, 8(4), 137–140.
Srdevic, Z., Blagojevic, B., and Srdevic, B. (2011). “AHP based group decision making in ranking loan applicants for purchasing irrigation equipment: a case study”. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 17(4), 531–543.
St. Clair, A. M., and Sinha, S. (2012). “State-of-the-technology review on water pipe condition, deterioration and failure rate prediction models”. Urban Water Journal, 9(2), 85–112.
U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (2015). Report to Congress on Impacts and Control of Combined Sewer Overflows and Sanitary Sewer Overflows. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/csossortc2004_full.pdf
Vladeanu, G., and Matthews, J. C. (2018). “Analysis of risk management methods used in trenchless renewal decision making”. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 72, 272–280
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Pipelines 2018: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation
Pages: 95 - 104
Editors: Christopher C. Macey, AECOM and Jason S. Lueke, Ph.D., Associated Engineering
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8165-3
Copyright
© 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 11, 2018
Published in print: Jul 12, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.