Chapter
Apr 17, 2018
Structures Congress 2018

Fragility Curve Development for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Retrofitted RC Bridges under Mainshock-Aftershock Seismic Sequences

Publication: Structures Congress 2018: Bridges, Transportation Structures, and Nonbuilding Structures

ABSTRACT

Bridges are one of the most important lifeline structures such that loss of functionality of the network system is directly related to the social and economic losses experienced following an earthquake. Due to the potential of strong aftershocks to cause further damage to mainshock damaged bridges, accurate evaluation of the structural performance during a real seismic sequence is essential. This paper investigates the seismic damage of a reinforced concrete (RC) skewed bridge subject to a sequence of earthquake ground motions. Fragility curves are developed for both with and without consideration of the effects of aftershocks on the seismic vulnerability of the bridges for two cases: original bridge and retrofitted bridge by FRP. Results of this study have revealed that the effect of aftershocks on damage states appears to increase the seismic vulnerability of RC bridges. In addition, the strategy of retrofit will significantly affect the seismic response and therefore fragility of bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCE

Abbasnia, R., Hosseinpour, F., Rostamian, M., and Ziaadiny, H. (2012). “Effect of corner radius on stress-strain behavior of FRP confined prisms under axial cyclic compression.” Eng Struct, 40,529–535.
Abbasnia, R., Hosseinpour, F., Rostamian, M., and Ziaadiny, H. (2013). “Cyclic and monotonic behavior of FRP confined concrete rectangular prisms with different aspect ratios.” Construction and Building Materials, 40,118–125.
Abdelnaby, AE. (2016). Fragility curves for RC frames subjected to Tohoku mainshock aftershocks sequences. Journal of Earthquake Engineering.
Abdollahzadeh, G.R, Vahedian, V., Omranian, E. (2017). A new method for generating aftershock records using artificial neural network. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, (revised).
Abdollahzadeh, G.R., Mohammadgholipour, A., Omranian, E. (2017). Seismic evaluation of steel moment frames under mainshock-aftershock sequence designed by elastic design and PBPD methods Journal of Earthquake Engineering, (accepted).
Baker, JW, Cornell, CA. (2006). Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 35(9):1077–1095.
Billah, A.H.M.M and Alam, M.S. (2015). Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review Structure and Infrastructure Engineering Vol. 11, Iss. 6.
Buckle, I. G. (2006). Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research, Development and Technology, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.
EQE Engineering (1990). The July 16, 1990 Philippines earthquake. A quick look report.
Fakharifar, M., Chen, G., Sneed, L., and Dalvand, A. (2015). Seismic performance of post-mainshock FRP/steel repaired RC bridge columns subjected to aftershocks. Composites Part B: Eng, 72, 183–198.
Garcia, JR. (2012). Mainshock–aftershock ground motion features and their influence in building’s seismic response. Journal of Earthquake Engineering; 16(5):719–37.
Goel, R., Chopra, A.K. (1994). Seismic Response Study of the US 101/Painter Street Overpass Using Strong Motion Records. Procs. Of SMIP94 seminar on seismological and engineering implications of recent strong-motion data, M. Huang, editor, 75–88.
Hosseinpour, F., and Abbasnia, R. (2014). Experimental investigation of the stress strain behavior of FRP confined concrete prisms. Advances in concrete construction 2 (3), 177–192.
Hosseinpour, F., and Abdelnaby, A. E. (2015). “Statistical evaluation of the monotonic models for FRP confined concrete prisms.” Advances in concrete construction 3 (3), 161–185.
Hosseinpour, F. and Abdelnaby, A.E. (2015). Statistical Investigation of the Behavior of FRP Confined Concrete Prisms Based on Experimental Data. Structures Congress 2015, 2260–2271.
Hosseinpour, F. and Abdelnaby, A.E. (2017). Effect of different aspects of multiple earthquakes on the nonlinear behavior of RC structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, pp. 706–725.
Hosseinpour, F., and Abdelnaby, A. E. (2017). Fragility curves for RC frames under multiple earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 98: 222–234.
Jalayer, F, Ebrahimian, H. (2016). Seismic risk assessment considering cumulative damage due to aftershocks. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics;
Jalayer. F, Ebrahimian. H, Miano. A, Manfredi, G., Sezen, H. (2017). Analytical fragility assessment using unscaled ground motion Records. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn.; 1–25.
Kiani, J. and Khanmohammadi, M. (2015). New approach for selection of real input ground motion records for incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Journal of Earthquake Engineering 19, no. 4: 592–623.
Huang, W. and Andrawes, B. (2014). Seismic Behavior of SMA Retrofitted RC Bridges Subjected to Strong Main Shock-Aftershock Sequences. Conference:Structures Congress 2014,280–290.
Kiani, J. and Pezeshk, S. (2017. Sensitivity analysis of the seismic demands of RC moment resisting frames to different aspects of ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.
Movaghati, S., Abdelnaby, A. (2016). Advancements in fragility analysis using numerical calibration methods for a horizontally curved RC bridge. Engineering Structures 125,236–243.
Nielson, B, DesRoches, R. (2007). Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics; 36(6):823–839.
OpenSees (2012). The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation. Available from: http://opensees.berkeley.edu: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).
Priestley, M.J.N. (1988). The Whittier Narrows, California Earthquake of October 1, 1987—Damage to the I-5/I-605 Separator. Earthquake Spectra, 4(2), pp.389–405.
Ramanathan, K.N. (2012). Next Generation Seismic Fragility Curves for California Bridges Incorporating the Evolution in Seismic Design Philosophy. Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA 2012.
Rostamian, M. (2011). Investigation of stress-strain behavior of FRP confined concrete columns under compressive loading. MS. Thesis, Iran University of Science and Technology, Iran.
Rostamian, M., Hosseinpour, F., Abdelnaby, A.E. (2017). Effect of Seismic Retrofitting on the Behavior of RC Bridge Columns Subjected to Main Shock-Aftershock Sequences, Structures Congress, 446–456.
Tavares, D.H. Cardona, L.; Paultre, P. (2010). Bridge reinforced concrete column limit state definition. In Anais do 52° Congresso Brasileiro do Concreto, Fortaleza.
Taskari, O., Sextos, A. (2015). Multi-angle, multi-damage fragility curves for seismic assessment of bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics; 44:2281–2301.
Turek, M., Ventura, C.E., Dowling, J., Molnar, S., Kaya, Y. (2014) Ambient Vibration Testing of the Painter St. Overpass. In: Catbas, F. (eds) Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham
Wen, X.Z., Zhang, P.Z., Du, F. and Long, F. (2009). The background of historical and modern seismic activities of the occurrence of the 2008 Ms 8.0 Wenchuan, Sichuan, earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 52(2), pp. 444–454.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Structures Congress 2018
Structures Congress 2018: Bridges, Transportation Structures, and Nonbuilding Structures
Pages: 308 - 316
Editor: James Gregory Soules, CB&I
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8133-2

History

Published online: Apr 17, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ehsan Omranian [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani Univ. of Technology, Babol, Iran; Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152. E-mail: [email protected]
Adel Abdelnaby [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152. E-mail: [email protected]
Gholamreza Abdollahzadeh [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani Univ. of Technology, Babol, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]
Mehdi Rostamian [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152. E-mail: [email protected]
Farid Hosseinpour [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$100.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$100.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share