Chapter
Aug 14, 2017
International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management 2016

Construction Project Safety Risk Analysis Based on the Fuzzy Fault Tree and Binary Decision Diagram

Publication: ICCREM 2016: BIM Application and Off-Site Construction

ABSTRACT

Construction safety risk analysis can provide the necessary insights for accident prevention. The fault tree analysis (FTA), as a conventional risk assessment tool, has gained widespread acceptance among practitioners in various industries. However, the analysis process, especially in construction settings, entails several difficulties owing to the constraint of sufficient data. To give a reliable approximation, the linguistic assessment and expert confidence index method are employed to convert the imprecise probability of occurrence of basic events into triangular fuzzy numbers. Owning to a large number of basic elements contributing to system failure in construction setting, the binary decision diagram (BDD), as a symbolic approach, is employed to overcome limitations of the algorithms based on the FTA in terms of both accuracy and efficiency. In the paper, the fuzzy Boolean algebras are utilized to determine the probability of the top event and the fuzzy importance measure (FIM) of the basic event. The approach proposed was verified using a scaffolding collapse case as an illustration. The paper offers some advantages of allowing to linguistic assessment for risk events, and also efficiently treating the risk analysis with the BDD method. The approach proposed can further construction safety practices as a fuzzy decision tool.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

ACKNOWLEDGE

The research was supported by the Scientific Research Experiment Program for The Trunk Steams Embankment Engineering, Heilongjiang Province: research on the operational management system and mechanism for the Sanjiang governance engineering. The work described in this paper was also funded by the National “Twelfth Five-Year” Science & Technology Program (No. 2012BAJ19B03)”.

REFERENCES

Abdelgawad, M. and Fayek, A.R. (2011). “Fuzzy reliability analyzer: Quantitative assessment of risk events in the construction industry using fuzzy fault-tree analysis.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(4), 294–302.
Bartlett, L.M. and Du, S. (2005). “New progressive variable ordering for binary decision diagram analysis of fault trees.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21(4), 413–425.
Bryant, R. E. (1986). “Graph-based algorithms for boolean function manipulation.” IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-35(8), 677–691.
Chen, C.T. (2000). “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9.
Chi, S., Han, S., Kim, D.Y. and Shin, Y. (2015). “Accident risk identification and its impact analyses for strategic construction safety management.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(4), 524–538.
Contini, S. and Matuzas, V. (2011). “Analysis of large fault trees based on functional decomposition.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(3), 383–390.
Deng, Y., Wang, H. and Guo, B. (2015). “BDD algorithms based on modularization for fault tree analysis.” Progress in Nuclear Energy, 85(2015), 192–199.
Gurcanli, G.E., Bilir, S. and Sevim, M. (2015). “Activity based risk assessment and safety cost estimation for residential building construction projects.” Safety Science, 80(2015), 1–12.
Halperin, K.M. and McCann, M. (2004). “An evaluation of scaffold safety at construction sites.” Journal of Safety Research, 35(2), 141–150.
Horčík, R. (2008). “Solution of a system of linear equations with fuzzy numbers.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159(14), 1788–1810.
Leu, S.S. and Chang, C.M. (2015). “Bayesian-network-based fall risk evaluation of steel construction projects by fault tree transformation.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(3), 334–342.
Ma, L., Bin Luo, H. and Chen, H.R. (2013). “Safety risk analysis based on a geotechnical instrumentation data warehouse in metro tunnel project.” Automation in Construction, 34(2013), 75–84.
National Bureau of Standards (NBS). (1986). “Type of casualty accidents.” <http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/zhengcefagui/1986-05/31/content74.htm> (May 31, 1986).
Reay, K.A. and Andrews, J.D. (2002). “A fault tree analysis strategy using binary decision diagrams.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 78(1), 45–56.
Ruijters, E. and Stoelinga, M. (2015). “Fault tree analysis: a survey of the state-of-the-art in modeling, analysis and tools.” Computer Science Review, 15–16(3), 29–62.
Sacks, R., Rozenfeld, O. and Rosenfeld, Y. (2009). “Spatial and temporal exposure to safety hazards in construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(8), 726–736.
Sinnamon, R.M. and Andrews, J.D. (1997). “Improved accuracy in quantitative fault tree analysis.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 13(5), 285–292.
State Administration of Work Safety (SAWS). (2015). “Accident inquiry.” <http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/> (Dec. 20, 2015).
Tixier, A.J.P., Hallowell, M.R., Albert, A., Van Boven, L. and Kleiner, B.M. (2014). “Psychological antecedents of risk-taking behavior in construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(11), 1–10.
Tixier, A.J.P., Hallowell, M.R., Rajagopalan, B. and Bowman, D. (2016). “Automated content analysis for construction safety: a natural language processing system to extract precursors and outcomes from unstructured injury reports.” Automation in Construction, 62(2016), 45–56.
Wu, C., Fang, D. and Li, N. (2015a). “Roles of owners’ leadership in construction safety: the case of high-speed railway construction projects in China.” International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), 1665–1679.
Wu, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Ding, L., Skibniewski, M.J. and Zhong, J. (2015b). “A dynamic decision approach for risk analysis in complex projects.” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 79(3–4), 591–601.
Zhang, L., Skibniewski, M.J., Wu, X., Chen, Y. and Deng, Q. (2014a). “A probabilistic approach for safety risk analysis in metro construction.” Safety Science, 63(3), 8–17.
Zhang, L., Wu, X., Qin, Y., Skibniewski, M.J. and Liu, W. (2015). “Towards a fuzzy Bayesian network based approach for safety risk analysis of tunnel-induced pipeline damage.” Risk Analysis, 36(2), 278–301.
Zhang, L., Wu, X., Skibniewski, M.J., Zhong, J. and Lu, Y. (2014b). “Bayesian-network-based safety risk analysis in construction projects.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 131(3), 29–39.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ICCREM 2016
ICCREM 2016: BIM Application and Off-Site Construction
Pages: 1326 - 1337
Editors: Yaowu Wang, Ph.D., Professor, Harbin Institute of Technology, Mohamed Al-Hussein, Ph.D., Professor, University of Alberta, Geoffrey Q. P. Shen, Ph.D., Professor, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, and Yimin Zhu, Ph.D., Professor, Louisiana State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8027-4

History

Published online: Aug 14, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Huakang Liang [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 150001. E-mail: [email protected]
Shoujian Zhang [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 150001. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$364.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$364.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share