Chapter
Feb 24, 2022
Chapter 7

Model Data, Geographical Information Systems, and Remote Sensing

Publication: Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation: Models, Methods, and Resources

Abstract

There are three major types of data that are required to build a total maximum daily load (TMDL) model: data on model parameter values, the system, and the TMDL. An important aspect of parameterizing models is the physical realism of the parameters themselves. To accurately simulate the transport and fate of water quality variables, adequate information is required for point sources and nonpoint sources of environmental pollutants. The TMDL limits should be set to meet or exceed the water quality standards in the region so that the designated use of a waterbody may be met. Geographic information systems and remote sensing have become indispensable tools for developing regional simulation models that form the backbone of many TMDL analyses. The remote sensing interpreted data resources are increasingly being used for basin-scale simulation modeling studies and TMDL development.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

References

Ahmadisharaf, E., R. A. Camacho, H. X. Zhang, M. Hantush, and M. M. Yusuf. 2019. “Calibration and validation of watershed models and advances in uncertainty analysis in TMDL studies.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (7): 03119001.
Aquaveo. 2017. Watershed Modeling System - The All-in-one Watershed Solution. AQUAVEO. Accessed November 13, 2021. http://www.aquaveo.com/software/wms-watershed-modeling-sys​tem-intro​duction.
ArcSWAT (ArcGIS-ArcView Extension of Soil and Water Assessment Tool). 2017. Texas A&M University and USDA-ARS. Accessed November 13, 2021. https://swat.tamu.edu/software/arcswat/.
ASCE. 2017. Total maximum daily load analysis and modeling: Assessment of the practice. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Becker, R., A. Koppa, S. Schulz, M. Usman, T. aus der Beek, and C. Schüth. 2019. “Spatially distributed model calibration of a highly managed hydrological system using remote sensing-derived ET data.” J. Hydrol. 577: 123944.
Benham, B. L., C. Baffaut, R. W. Zeckoski, K. R. Mankin, Y. A. Pachepsky, A. M. Sadeghi, et al. 2006. “Modeling bacteria fate and transport in watersheds to support TMDLs.” Trans. ASABE 49 (4): 987–1002.
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., A. Plaza, G. Camps-Valls, P. Scheunders, N. Nasrabadi, and J. Chanussot. 2013. “Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges.” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 1 (2): 6–36.
Borah, D., and M. Bera. 2003. “Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: Review of mathematical bases.” Trans. ASAE 46 (6): 1553–1566.
Borah, D. K., and M. Bera. 2004. “Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: Review of applications.” Trans. ASAE 47 (3): 789–803.
Borah, D. K., G. Yagow, A. Saleh, P. L. Barnes, W. Rosenthal, E. C. Krug, et al. 2006. “Sediment and nutrient modeling for TMDL development and implementation.” Trans. ASABE 49 (4): 967–986.
Caldwell, S. H., C. Kelleher, E. A. Baker, and L. K. Lautz. 2019. “Relative information from thermal infrared imagery via unoccupied aerial vehicle informs simulations and spatially-distributed assessments of stream temperature.” Sci. Total Environ. 661: 364–374.
Cappiella, K., and K. Brown. 2001. Derivations of impervious cover for suburban land uses in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Ellicott City, MD: EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Center for Watershed Protection.
Chang, C. 2013. Hyperspectral data processing: Algorithm design and analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Chapra S. C. 2003. “Engineering water quality models and TMDLs.” J. Water Res. Plan. Mgmt. 129 (4): July 2003, doi:
.
Diaz, J. C. F., W. E. Carter, R. L. Shrestha, and C. L. Glennie. 2013. “Lidar remote sensing.” In Handbook of satellite applications, edited by J. N. Pelton, S. Madry, and S. Camacho-Lara, 757–808. New York: Springer.
Dile, Y. T., P. Daggupati, C. George, R. Srinivasan, and J. Arnold. 2016. “Introducing a new open source GIS user interface for the SWAT model.” Environ. Modell. Software 85: 129–138.
Doherty, J. E., and R. J. Hunt. 2010. Approaches to highly parameterized inversion—A guide to using PEST for groundwater-model calibration. Scientific Investigations Rep. No. 2010-5169. Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
Domeneghetti, A., A. Tarpanelli, L. Brocca, S. Barbetta, T. Moramarco, A. Castellarin, et al. 2014. “The use of remote sensing-derived water surface data for hydraulic model calibration.” Remote Sens. Environ. 149: 130–141.
Fisher, J. B., B. Lee, A. J. Purdy, G. H. Halverson, M. B. Dohlen, K. Cawse-Nicholson, et al. 2020. “ECOSTRESS: NASA's next generation mission to measure evapotranspiration from the International Space Station.” Water Resour. Res. 56 (4): e2019WR026058.
Fu, B., J. S. Horsburgh, A. J. Jakeman, C. Gualtieri, T. Arnold, L. Marshall, et al. 2020. Modeling water quality in watersheds: From here to the next generation.” Water Resour. Res. 56: e2020WR027721.
Gao, B., M. Montes, C. Davis, and A. Goetz. 2009. “Atmospheric correction algorithms for hyperspectral remote sensing data of land and ocean.” Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (1): S17–S24.
Gao, J., M. J. White, K. Bieger, and J. G. Arnold. 2020. “Design and development of a python-based interface for processing massive data with the LOAD ESTimator (LOADEST).” Environ. Modell. Software 135: 104897
Gholizadeh, M. H., A. M. Melesse, and L. A. Reddi. 2016. “Comprehensive review on water quality parameters estimation using remote sensing techniques.” Sensors 16: 1298.
Hoffmann, H., H. Nieto, R. Jensen, R. Guzinski, P. J. Zarco-Tejada, and T. Friborg. 2015. “Estimating evapotranspiration with thermal UAV data and two source energy balance models.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 12: 8.
Humboldt State University. 2016. “Introduction to remote sensing.” Accessed October 16, 2021. https://extended.humboldt.edu/extended-education/online-geospatial-certificate-program/course/introduction-remote-sensing.
InfoSWMM. 2017. “Sophisticated geospatial urban drainage modeling.” Accessed October 10, 2021. http://www.innovyze.com/products/infoswmm/.
Kang, M. S. 2002. “Development of total maximum daily loads simulation system using artificial neural networks for satellite data analysis and nonpoint source pollution models.” [In Korean]. Ph.D. thesis, Seoul National University, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Kang, M. S., and S. W. Park. 2003. “Development and application of total maximum daily loads simulation system using nonpoint source pollution model.” J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc. 36 (1): 117–128.
Kang, M. S., S. W. Park, J. J. Lee, and K. H. Yoo. 2006. “Applying SWAT for TMDL programs to a small watershed containing rice paddy fields.” Agric. Water Manage. 79 (1): 72–92.
Karpouzli, E., and T. Malthus. 2003. “The empirical line method for the atmospheric correction of IKONOS imagery.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 24 (5): 1143–1150.
Martin, P., E. LeBoeuf, J. Dobbins, E. Daniel, and M. Abkowitz. 2005. “Interfacing GIS with water resource models: A state-of-the-art review.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 41 (6): 1471–1487.
Olmanson, L. G., P. L. Brezonik, and M. E. Bauer. 2013. “Airborne hyperspectral remote sensing to assess spatial distribution of water quality characteristics in large rivers: The Mississippi River and its tributaries in Minnesota.” Remote Sens. Environ. 130: 254–265.
Quinn, N.W.T., S. Kumar, and S. Imen. 2019. “Overview of remote sensing and GIS uses in watershed and TMDL analyses.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (4): 1–9.
Ramirez, C. M., J. H. Viers, J. F. Quinn, M. L. Johnson, B. Kozlowicz, and J. Florsheim. 2005. “Mass wasting identification in the Navarro River watershed using hyperspectral imagery.” In California and the world ocean ‘02: Revisiting and revising California's ocean agenda, edited by O. T. Magoon, H. Converse, B. Baird, B. Jines, and M. Miller-Henson, 1279–1288. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Richard, J. 1986. Remote sensing digital image analysis: An introduction. New York: Springer.
Shafique, N., F. Fulk, B. C. Autrey, and J. E. Flotemersch. 2003. “Hyperspectral remote sensing of water quality parameters for large rivers in the Ohio River basin.” In Proc., 1st Interagency Conf. on Research in the Watersheds. Washington, DC: USEPA
.
Shirmohammadi, A., I. Chaubey, R. D. Harmel, D. D. Bosch, R. Munoz-Carpena, C. Dharmasri, et al. 2006. “Uncertainty in TMDL models.” Trans. ASABE 49 (4): 1033–1049.
Sun, L., M. Xueting, J. Wei, J. Wang, X. Tian, H. Yu, et al. 2017. “A cloud detection algorithm-generating method for remote sensing data at visible to short-wave infrared wavelengths.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 124: 70–88.
Thomas, G., and A. Henderson-Sellers. 1991. “An evaluation of proposed representations of subgrid hydrologic processes in climate models.” J. Clim. 4 (9): 898–910.
Topp, S. N., T. M. Pavelsky, D. Jensen, M. Simard, and M. R. V. Ross. 2020. “Research trends in the use of remote sensing for inland water quality science: Moving towards multidisciplinary applications.” Water 12: 169.
Viers, J. H., C. M. Ramirez, J. F. Quinn, and M. L. Johnson. 2005. “The use of hyperspectral technologies to identify riparian habitats in coastal watersheds: An example from the Navarro River, California.” In California and the world ocean ‘02: Revisiting and revising California's ocean agenda, edited by O. T. Magoon, H. Converse, B. Baird, B. Jines, and M. Miller-Henson, 1377–1391. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Waichler, S. R., and M. S. Wigmosta. 2003. “Development of hourly meteorological values from daily data and significance to hydrological modeling at HJ Andrews Experimental Forest.” J. Hydrometeorol. 4 (2): 251–263.
Wallace, C. W., B. L. Benham, E. R. Yagow, and D. L. Gallagher. 2018. “Comparison of two alternative methods for developing TMDLs to address sediment impairments.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 23 (12): 05018023.
Whittemore, R. C., and J. Beebe. 2000. “EPA'S BASINS model: good science or serendipitous modeling?” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 36 (3): 493–499.
Zaidi, A. 2012. “Water quality management using GIS and RS tools.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Cong. 2012, edited by E. D. Loucks, 842–848. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zarco-Tejada, P., and V. González-Dugo. 2012. “Fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band indices acquired from a UAV platform for water stress detection using a micro-hyperspectral imager and a thermal.” Remote Sens. Environ. 117: 322–337.
Zhang, H. X., and N. W. T. Quinn. 2019. “Simple models and analytical procedures for total maximum daily load assessment.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (2): 02518002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation
Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation: Models, Methods, and Resources
Pages: 193 - 214
Editors: Harry X. Zhang, Ph.D., Nigel W.T. Quinn, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3333-4763, Deva K. Borah, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2107-9390, and G. Padmanabhan, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3209-1379
ISBN (Print): 978-0-7844-1594-8
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8382-4

History

Published online: Feb 24, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$150.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$150.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share