Chapter 5
Preference for A + B Contracting Technique among State Departments of Transportation
Publication: Alternative Project Delivery Procurement, and Contracting Methods for Highways
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
References
AASHTO, (2001). Primer on Contracting for the 21st Century: A Report of the Contract Administration Task Force of the AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction. 4th Edition
Abi-Habib, N, Safir, A., Triplett, T. (2002). NSAF Survey Methods and Data Reliability, National Survey of American Families, Report No. 1.
Bolling, D.Y., and Holland, J. (2003). Factors to Consider in Innovative Contracting, Utah Technology Transfer Center.
Carpenter, B., Fekpe, E., and Gopalakrishna, D. (2003). Performance-Based Contracting for the Highway Construction Industry Battelle: Columbus, Ohio
Federal Register, (2002). Vol. 67, No. 237; Tuesday, December 10, / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Highway Administration, (2002). FHWA Briefing Special Experimental Projects No. 14 Innovative Contracting; February.
Florida DOT, (2000). "Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability." Highway Construction and Engineering and Transportation System Maintenance Programs, Chapter 4, Report 99-29, January.
Minnesota Department of Transportation, (2003). "Minnesota Statewide Transportation Plan" August.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2001). "Guidelines for Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best Value Contracting", Report 451, Washington, DC
Ohio DOT, (2003). Innovative Contracting Manual, September 1.
Shr, J-F, Thompson, B.P., Russell, J.S., Ran, B., and Tsemg, H.P. (2000). "Determining minimum contract time for highway projects" Transportation Research Record 1712, Transportation Research Board, National Academies, pp. 1965–201.
Shr, J-F, Ran, B., and Sung, C.W. (2004). "Method to determine minimum contract bid for A + B + I/D highway projects" Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 130, (4), pp. 509–516.
South Dakota DOT, (1996). Criteria and Guidelines for Innovative Contracting, Office of Research Report SD95-07-X.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Alternative Project Delivery Procurement, and Contracting Methods for Highways
Pages: 80 - 97
Copyright
© 2007 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: May 6, 2013
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.