TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 22, 2010

Strength of Sawn Lumber and Wood Composite Dowel Connections Loaded Perpendicular to Grain. II: Fracture Mechanics Equations

This article is a reply.
VIEW THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 12

Abstract

Splitting failure modes of perpendicular to grain bolted connections have received little attention when compared to splitting modes in parallel to grain connections. Previous research by the authors tested a series of single bolt, double shear perpendicular to grain connections of machine stress rated (MSR) lumber, laminated veneer lumber (LVL), and parallel strand lumber (PSL). Many of the experimental tests resulted in failure by splitting. Two fracture mechanics based models for connections proposed elsewhere were applied. Input parameters for the models were generated by testing matched sections to the connection strength samples. Input properties for the Van der Put model included shear modulus and Mode I fracture energy. Inputs for the Jensen model included shear modulus, modulus of elasticity, Mode I fracture energy, and tension perpendicular to grain strength. Mode I fracture energy of PSL was markedly greater than the energy associated with MSR Lumber and LVL. The Van der Put model overpredicted the experimental connection strength by at least 77%. The Jensen model was found to most accurately predict the connection strength over the entire range of configurations tested. Comparing the Van der Put and Jensen models to the previous work using the national design specification, the Jensen model performed the best in terms of accuracy. The tension perpendicular to grain strength and the method of fracture energy calculation may be important parameters for the capacity of perpendicular to grain loaded wood members.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA). (1999). “General dowel equations for calculating lateral connection values.” Technical Rep. 12, Washington, D.C.
American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA). (2005). National design specification for wood construction, Washington, D.C.
ASTM. (2005a). “Standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness K Ic of metallic materials.” E399-90, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2005b). “Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials.” D5045-99, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2005c). “Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber.” D143-94, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2005d). “Standard test methods of static tests of lumber in structural size.” D198-05, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Ballerini, M. (1999). “A new set of experimental tests on beams loaded perpendicular to grain by dowel type joints.” Proc., CIB-W18 Meeting 32.
Ehart, R. J. A., Stanzl-Tschegg, S. E., and Tschegg, E. K. (1998). “Fracture characteristics of PARALLAM PSL in comparison to solid wood and particleboard.” Wood Sci. Technol., 32, 43–55.
Eurocode 5. (2004). “Design of timber structures. I.” ENV 2005-1-1, Comite Europeen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium.
Finkenbinder, D. E. (2007). “An experimental investigation of structural composite lumber loaded by a dowel in perpendicular to grain orientation at yield and capacity.” M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, Va., 180.
Harrison, S. K., and Hindman, D. P. (2007). “Test method comparison of shear modulus evaluation of MSR and SCL products.” For. Prod. J., 57(7/8), 32–38.
Hindman, D. P., Finkenbinder, D. E., Loferski, J. R., and Line, P. (2010). “Strength of sawn lumber and wood composite dowel connections loaded perpendicular to grain. I: NDS design equations.” J. Mater., 22(12), 1217–1225.
Hummer, T., Dolan, J. D., and Wolcott, M. 2006. “Tension perpendicular to grain strength of wood, laminated veneer lumber, and a wood plastic composite.” Proc., World Conf. on Timber Engineering, 6.
Jensen, J. L., Gustafsson, P. J., and Larsen, H. J. (2003). “A tensile fracture model for joints with rods or dowels loaded perpendicular to grain.” Proc., CIB-W18 Meeting 36.
Kasim, M., and Quenneville, J. H. P. (2002). “Effect of row spacing on the capacity of perpendicular to grain loaded timber joints with multiple timber connections loaded perpendicular to grain.” Proc., CIB-W18 Meeting 35.
Petersson, H. (1995). “Fracture mechanics of timber beams and end notches.” Proc., CIB-W18 Meeting 38.
Quenneville, J. H. P., and Mohammad, M. (2001). “A proposed Canadian design approach for bolted connections loaded perpendicular to grain, joints in timber structures.” Proc., Int. RILEM Symp.
Ramskill, T. E. (2002). “Effect of cracking on lag bolt performance.” Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, Va., 306.
Reshke, R. G. (1999). “Bolted timber connections loaded perpendicular-to-grain.” Ph.D. thesis, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, 294.
Smart, J. V. (2002). “Capacity resistance and performance of single-shear bolted and nailed connections: An experimental investigation.” M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, Va., 131.
Smith, I., and Foliente, G. (2002). “Load and resistance factor design of timber joints: International practice and future direction.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(1), 48–59.
Smith, I., Landis, E., and Gong, M. (2003). Fracture and fatigue in wood, Wiley, Sussex, England.
Smulski, S. (1997). Engineered wood products: A guide for specifiers, designers, and users, PFS Research Foundation, Madison, Wis.
Snow, M., Asiz, A., and Smith, I. (2004). “Failure behaviour of single dowel connections in engineered wood products.” 5th Structural Specialty Conf. of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Van der Put, T. A. C. M., and Leijten, A. J. M. (2000). “Evaluation of perpendicular to grain failure of beams caused by concentrated loads at joints.” Proc., CIB-W18 Meeting 33.
Yasumura, M. (2001). “Criteria for damage and failure of dowel-type joints subjected to force perpendicular to grain.” Proc., CIB-W18 Meeting 34.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 22Issue 12December 2010
Pages: 1226 - 1234

History

Received: Sep 24, 2009
Accepted: Jun 10, 2010
Published online: Jun 22, 2010
Published in print: Dec 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Daniel P. Hindman, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Wood Science and Forest Products, Virginia Tech, 1650 Ramble Rd., Blacksburg, VA 24061 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
David E. Finkenbinder
Design Engineer, Simpson Strong Tie, 2600 International St., Columbus, OH 43228.
Joseph R. Loferski
Professor, Wood Science and Forest Products, Virginia Tech, 1650 Ramble Rd., Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Philip Line, A.M.ASCE
Senior Structural Engineer, URS Corporation, 200 Oak Ridge Dr., Suite 101, Gaithersburg, MD.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share