Technical Papers
Jul 11, 2018

Low-Impact Development Effects on Aquifer Recharge Using Coupled Surface and Groundwater Models

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 9

Abstract

Low impact development (LID) is promoted as a sustainable management practice for stormwater in urbanized catchments. While the positive effects of LID features on surface water hydrology and water quality have been investigated, less is known regarding their effects on aquifer recharge. The hydrologic model PCSWMM was coupled with the groundwater model MODFLOW to assess the influence of LID on aquifer recharge in a study area undergoing residential development. The coupled models were calibrated and validated with predevelopment stream flows and groundwater levels from a predominately-forested catchment. PCSWMM was used to quantify net infiltration rates for conventional and LID stormwater practices for the development. Net infiltration rates were then coupled with MODFLOW to determine aquifer recharge and the potential effects on groundwater availability for the development. Results suggested that LID practices would help restore predevelopment aquifer recharge conditions. This study demonstrated a novel approach for assessing the effects of LID stormwater practices on aquifer recharge and groundwater availability in new residential developments.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and the Canadian Water Network. Special thanks to Brad Harnett from Seven Lakes Development and WSP Global for sharing survey data. We extend our gratitude to Peter Golden, Richard Scott, Tristan Goulden, Audrey Hiscock, and Robert Johnson for assistance with fieldwork.

References

Ahiablame, L. M., B. A. Engel, and I. Chaubey. 2012. “Effectiveness of low impact development practices: Literature review and suggestions for future research.” Water Air Soil Pollut. 223 (7): 4253–4273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2.
Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422-63. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bedient, P. B., W. C. Huber, and B. E. Vieux. 2013. Hydrology and floodplain analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
CBCL Limited. 2004. Atlantic Canada guidelines for the supply, treatment, storage, distribution and operation of drinking water supply systems. Halifax, Canada: CBCL.
CBC News. 2010. “City water to flow to Beaver Bank homes.” Accessed June 30, 2017. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/city-water-to-flow-to-beaver-bank-homes-1.903333.
DeFries, R., and K. N. Eshleman. 2004. “Land-use change and hydrologic processes: A major focus for the future.” Hydrol. Processes 18 (11): 2183–2186. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5584.
Dietz, M. E. 2007. “Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions.” Water Air Soil Pollut. 186 (1–4): 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z.
Dingman, S. L. 2002. Physical hydrology. 2nd ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Eijkelkamp. 2011. 2800 Operating instruction 09.07 Guelph permeameter. Giesbeek, Netherlands: Eijkelkamp Agrisearch Equipment.
Elrick, D. E., and W. D. Reynolds. 1986. “An analysis of the percolation test based on three-dimensional saturated-unsaturated flow from a cylindrical test hole.” Soil Sci. 142 (5): 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198611000-00009.
Endreny, T., and V. Collins. 2009. “Implications of bioretention basin spatial arrangements on stormwater recharge and groundwater mounding.” Ecol. Eng. 35 (5): 670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.10.017.
Göbel, P., et al. 2004. “Near-natural stormwater management and its effects on the water budget and groundwater surface in urban areas taking account of the hydrogeological conditions.” J. Hydrol. 299 (3–4): 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.013.
Government of Canada. 2017a. “Canadian climate normals 1981–2010 station data.” Climate normal and averages. Environment and Natural Resources. Accessed June 30, 2017. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html?stnID=6465&autofwd=1.
Government of Canada. 2017b. “Canadian weather energy and engineering datasets (CWEEDS).” Engineering climate datasets. Environment and Natural Resources. Accessed June 29, 2017. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/prods_servs/engineering_e.html.
Holysh, S., and R. Gerber. 2014. “Groundwater knowledge management for southern Ontario: An example from the Oak Ridge Moraine.” Can. Water. Resour. J. 39 (2): 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2014.914788.
James, W., L. A. Rossman, W. Robert, and C. James. 2010. User’s guide to SWMM5. 13th ed. ON, Canada: CHI Press.
Keppie, J. D. 2000. Geological map of the province of Nova Scotia. Halifax, Canada: Nova Scotia Dept. of Natural Resources.
Krause, P., D. P. Boyle, and F. Bäse. 2005. “Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment.” Adv. Geosci. 5: 89–97. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005.
Lavoie, R., A. Lebel, F. Joerin, and M. J. Rodriguez. 2013. “Integration of groundwater information into decision making for regional planning: A portrait for North America.” J. Environ. Manage. 114: 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.056.
Legates, D. R., and G. J. McCabe Jr. 1999. “Evaluating the use of ‘goodness-of-fit’ measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (1): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018.
Lenhart, T., K. Eckhardt, N. Fohrer, and H.-G. Frede. 2002. “Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis.” Phys. Chem. Earth 27 (9–10): 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00049-9.
MacDougall, J. I., D. B. Cann, and J. D. Hilchey. 1963. Soil survey of Halifax County Nova Scotia. NS, Canada: Nova Scotia Dept. of Agriculture and Marketing.
Marchildon, M. M., and J. D. C. Kassenaar. 2013. “Analyzing low impact development strategies using continuous fully distributed coupled groundwater and surface water models.” J. Water Manage. Model. R246-17. https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R246-17.
McCuen, R. H. 1973. “The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol. 18 (1): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(73)90024-3.
Mejía, A. I., and G. E. Moglen. 2010. “Impact of the spatial distribution of imperviousness on the hydrologic response of an urbanizing basin.” Hydrol. Processes 24 (23): 3359–3373. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7755.
Merritt, M. L., and L. F. Koniknow. 2000. Documentation of a computer program to simulate lake-aquifer interaction using the MODFLOW ground-water flow model and the MOC3D solute-transport model. Water-Resources Investigations Rep. No. 00-4167. Tallahassee, FL: USGS.
Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE 50 (3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153.
Priestley, C. H. B., and R. J. Taylor. 1972. “On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters.” Mon. Weather Rev. 100 (2): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100%3C0081:OTAOSH%3E2.3.CO;2.
Province of Nova Scotia. 2006. “Enhanced digital elevation model, Nova Scotia, Canada.” DP ME55. Version 2. Halifax, NS, Canada. Accessed June 29, 2017. https://novascotia.ca/natr/meb/download/dp055.asp.
Province of Nova Scotia. 2015. “Geographic information systems—Forestry.” Dept. of Natural Resources. Halifax, NS, Canada. Accessed June 29, 2017. https://novascotia.ca/natr/forestry/gis/downloads.asp.
Rawls, W. J., D. L. Brakensieke, and N. Miller. 1983. “Green-ampt infiltration parameters from soils data.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 109 (1): 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:1(62).
Rempe, D. M., and W. E. Dietrich. 2014. “A bottom-up control on fresh-bedrock topography under landscapes.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 (18): 6576–6581. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404763111.
Reynolds, W. D. 1993. “Saturated hydraulic conductivity: Laboratory measurement.” In Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 589–598. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishing.
Reynolds, W. D., and D. E. Elrick. 1985. “In situ measurement of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity, sorptivity, and the α-parameter using the Guelph permeameter.” Soil Sci. 140 (4): 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198510000-00008.
Rivard, C., R. L. Lefebvre, and D. Paradis. 2014. “Regional recharge estimation using multiple methods: An application in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia (Canada).” Environ. Earth Sci. 71 (3): 1389–1408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2545-2.
Roesner, L. A., B. P. Bledsoe, and R. W. Bradshear. 2001. “Are best-management-practice criteria really environmentally friendly?” J. Water Res. Plann. Manage. 127 (3): 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(150).
Salvadore, E., J. Bronders, and O. Batelaan. 2015. “Hydrological modelling of urbanized catchments: A review and future directions.” J. Hydrol. 529 (1): 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.028.
Schirmer, M., S. Leschik, and A. Musolff. 2013. “Current research in urban hydrogeology—A review.” Adv. Water Resour. 51: 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.06.015.
Soilmoisture Equipment Corp. 2008. Model 2800K1 Guelph Permeameter Operating Instructions. Santa Barbara, CA: Soilmoisture Equipment.
Sousa, M. R., D. L. Rudolph, and E. O. Frind. 2014. “Threats to groundwater resources in urbanizing watersheds: The Waterloo Moraine and beyond.” Can. Water. Resour. J. 39 (2): 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2014.914801.
Stephens, D. B., M. Miller, S. J. Moore, T. Umstot, and D. J. Salvato. 2012. “Decentralized groundwater recharge systems using roofwater and stormwater runoff.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 48 (1): 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00600.x.
Xu, C.-Y., and V. P. Singh. 2002. “Cross comparison of empirical equations for calculating potential evapotranspiration with data from Switzerland.” Water Resour. Manage. 16 (3): 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020282515975.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23Issue 9September 2018

History

Received: Jul 11, 2017
Accepted: Feb 28, 2018
Published online: Jul 11, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Eva W. Mooers
P.Eng.
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie Univ., Centre for Water Resources Studies, 1360 Barrington St., Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2.
Rob C. Jamieson [email protected]
P.Eng.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie Univ., Centre for Water Resources Studies, 1360 Barrington St., Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Jenny L. Hayward
P.Eng.
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie Univ., Centre for Water Resources Studies, 1360 Barrington St., Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2.
John Drage
Geologist, Geological Services Division, Nova Scotia Dept. of Natural Resources, 1701 Hollis St., Halifax, NS, Canada B3J 2T9.
Craig B. Lake
P.Eng.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie Univ., Centre for Water Resources Studies, 1360 Barrington St., Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share