Technical Papers
Sep 22, 2021

Role of Shear Deformability on the Response of Tunnels and Pipelines to Single and Twin Tunneling

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 12

Abstract

Tunneling can compromise the safety and serviceability of existing buried infrastructure because of settlements, crack openings, dislocations, and material strains. A continuum-based soil-structure interaction model, implementing an equivalent Timoshenko beam, is used to evaluate the excavation-induced settlements and longitudinal deformations of existing tunnels and pipelines. Both single and twin tunneling scenarios are examined. The shear flexibility of shield and sprayed concrete lining tunnels may be significant. This increases tunneling-induced settlements while it decreases tilt, curvature, and the associated bending moment, with implications for optimal monitoring installations. In this work, a new dimensionless shear factor is introduced, governing the relative importance of shear and bending deformations and accounting for the settlement trough width. This can be used to evaluate if a pure-bending, shear-dominated, or mixed deformation mode should be expected. Design charts to assess existing infrastructure affected by either single or twin tunnels are proposed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 793715. The authors are grateful to Professor A. Klar for valuable comments and for sharing analytical data.

References

Alhaddad, M., M. J. Wilcock, C. Y. Gue, K. Soga, M. Devriendt, and M. Dewhirst. 2020. “Cast-iron tunnels’ tolerance to imposed longitudinal settlement curvature.” Géotechnique 2020 (Dec): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.182.
Attewell, P. B., and J. P. Woodman. 1982. “Predicting the dynamics of ground settlement and its derivatives caused by tunnelling in soil.” Gr. Eng. 15 (8): 13–22.
Cording, E. J., and W. H. Hansmire. 1975. “Displacement around soft ground tunnels, general report: Session IV, tunnels in soil.” In Proc., 5th Panam Conf. Soil Mechanics Foundation Engineering, 571–632. New York: Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
Dimmock, P. S., and R. J. Mair. 2008. “Effect of building stiffness on tunnelling-induced ground movement.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 23 (4): 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.08.001.
Do, N.-A., D. Dias, and P. Oreste. 2015. “3D numerical investigation on the interaction between mechanized twin tunnels in soft ground.” Environ. Earth Sci. 73 (5): 2101–2113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3561-6.
Fargnoli, V., D. Boldini, and A. Amorosi. 2015. “Twin tunnel excavation in coarse grained soils: Observations and numerical back-predictions under free field conditions and in presence of a surface structure.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 49 (3): 454–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.06.003.
Friedman, Z., and J. B. Kosmatka. 1993. “An improved two-node Timoshenko beam finite element.” Comput. Struct. 47 (3): 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(93)90243-7.
Gue, C. Y., M. J. Wilcock, M. M. Alhaddad, M. Z. E. B. Elshafie, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair. 2017. “Tunnelling close beneath an existing tunnel in clay—Perpendicular undercrossing.” Géotechnique 67 (9): 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.SiP17.P.117.
Jin, D., D. Yuan, X. Li, and H. Zheng. 2018. “Analysis of the settlement of an existing tunnel induced by shield tunneling underneath.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 81 (Nov): 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.035.
Klar, A. 2018. “Elastic continuum solution for tunneling effects on buried pipelines using Fourier expansion.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (9): 04018062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001945.
Klar, A., I. Elkayam, and A. M. Marshall. 2016. “Design oriented linear-equivalent approach for evaluating the effect of tunneling on pipelines.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (1): 04015062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001376.
Klar, A., A. M. Marshall, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair. 2008. “Tunneling effects on jointed pipelines.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (1): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-068.
Klar, A., T. E. B. Vorster, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair. 2005. “Soil-pipe interaction due to tunnelling: Comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions.” Géotechnique 55 (6): 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.6.461.
Li, P., S.-J. Du, S.-L. Shen, Y.-H. Wang, and H.-H. Zhao. 2016. “Timoshenko beam solution for the response of existing tunnels because of tunneling underneath.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 40 (5): 766–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2426.
Liao, S.-M., F.-L. Peng, and S.-L. Shen. 2008. “Analysis of shearing effect on tunnel induced by load transfer along longitudinal direction.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 23 (4): 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.07.001.
Lin, C., and M. Huang. 2019. “Tunnelling-induced response of a jointed pipeline and its equivalence to a continuous structure.” Soils Found. 59 (4): 828–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.02.009.
Losacco, N., L. Callisto, and A. Burghignoli. 2016. “Soil-structure interaction due to tunnelling in soft ground, an equivalent solid approach.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. Structure Analysis History Construction SAHC 2016, 495–502. Leuven, Belgium: CRC Press.
Mair, R. J. 2008. “Tunnelling and geotechnics: New horizons.” Géotechnique 58 (9): 695–736. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.9.695.
Mair, R. J., and R. N. Taylor. 1997. “Theme lecture: Bored tunnelling in the urban environment.” In Proc., 14th Int. Conf. soil Mechanics Foundation Engineering, 2353–2385. Avereest, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Marshall, A. M., A. Klar, and R. J. Mair. 2010. “Tunneling beneath buried pipes: View of soil strain and its effect on pipeline behavior.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (12): 1664–1672. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000390.
Ou, C.-Y., R. N. Hwang, and W.-J. Lai. 1998. “Surface settlement during shield tunnelling at CH218 in Taipei.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (1): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-073.
Pinto, F., and A. J. Whittle. 2014. “Ground movements due to shallow tunnels in soft ground. I: Analytical solutions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (4): 04013040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000948.
Shen, S.-L., H.-N. Wu, Y.-J. Cui, and Z.-Y. Yin. 2014. “Long-term settlement behaviour of metro tunnels in the soft deposits of Shanghai.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 40 (2): 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.013.
Shirlaw, J. N., and J. P. Copsey. 1988. “Settlements over tunnels in Singapore marine clay.” In Proc., 5th Int. Geotechnical Seminar Singapore “Case Hist. Soft Clays”, 59–72. Singapore: NTI.
Standing, J. R., and D. Selemetas. 2013. “Greenfield ground response to EPBM tunnelling in London Clay.” Géotechnique 63 (12): 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.154.
Suwansawat, S., and H. H. Einstein. 2007. “Describing settlement troughs over twin tunnels using a superposition technique.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (4): 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(445).
Vorster, T. E. B., A. Klar, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair. 2005. “Estimating the effects of tunneling on existing pipelines.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (11): 1399–1410. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1399).
Wu, H.-N., S.-L. Shen, J. Yang, and A. Zhou. 2018. “Soil-tunnel interaction modelling for shield tunnels considering shearing dislocation in longitudinal joints.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 78 (Sep): 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.009.
Yiu, W. N., H. J. Burd, and C. M. Martin. 2017. “Finite-element modelling for the assessment of tunnel-induced damage to a masonry building.” Géotechnique 67 (9): 780–794. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.sip17.P.249.
Zhang, D. M., Z. K. Huang, Z. L. Li, X. Zong, and D. M. Zhang. 2019. “Analytical solution for the response of an existing tunnel to a new tunnel excavation underneath.” Comput. Geotech. 108 (Apr): 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.12.026.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 12December 2021

History

Received: Nov 11, 2019
Accepted: Jul 13, 2021
Published online: Sep 22, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 22, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Aarhus Univ., Inge Lehmanns Gade 10, Aarhus 8000, Denmark (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8510-0355. Email: [email protected]
Giulia M. B. Viggiani, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0993-0322
Professor of Infrastructure Geotechnics, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge, Trumpington St., Cambridge, UK CB2 1PZ. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0993-0322

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Settlement characteristics of immersed tunnel of Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macau Bridge project, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering, 10.1680/jgeen.22.00200, (1-13), (2023).
  • Mathematical modelling for shield tunneling induced displacement effects on in-service tunnel: theoretical solution including shearing deformation of segment and stiffness reduction of circumferential joints, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 10.1016/j.apm.2023.01.031, 118, (322-345), (2023).
  • Spatiotemporal Deformation of Existing Pipeline Due to New Shield Tunnelling Parallel Beneath Considering Construction Process, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app12010500, 12, 1, (500), (2022).
  • Simplified analytical solution for responses of fault-crossing tunnels with flexible joints under fault movement, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.054, 45, (984-998), (2022).
  • Timoshenko-beam-based response of existing tunnel to single tunneling underneath and numerical verification of opening and dislocation, Computers and Geotechnics, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104757, 147, (104757), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share