Load-Carrying Capacity and Required Reinforcement Strength of Closely Spaced Soil-Geosynthetic Composites
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 9
Abstract
In current design methods for reinforced soil walls, it has been tacitly assumed that reinforcement strength and reinforcement spacing play an equal role. This fundamental design assumption has led to the use of larger reinforcement spacing (0.3–1.0 m) in conjunction with stronger reinforcement to reduce construction time. Recent studies, however, have clearly indicated that the role of reinforcement spacing is much more significant than that of reinforcement strength. With closely spaced (reinforcement spacing ) reinforcement, the beneficial effects of geosynthetic inclusion is significantly enhanced, and the load-deformation behavior can be characterized as that of a composite material. A reinforced soil mass with closely spaced geosynthetic reinforcement is referred to as geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS). In this study, an analytical model is developed for predicting the ultimate load-carrying capacity and required reinforcement strength of a GRS mass. The model was developed based on a semiempirical equation that reflects the relative roles of reinforcement spacing and reinforcement strength in a GRS mass. Using measured data from field-scale experiments available to date, it is shown that the analytical model is capable of predicting the ultimate load-carrying capacity and required reinforcement strength of a GRS mass with good accuracy.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adams, M. T., Lillis, C. P., Wu, J. T. H., and Ketchart, K. (2002). “Vegas mini pier experiment and postulate of zero volume change.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Geosynthetics, 389–394.
Adams, M. T., Nicks, J., Stabile, T., Wu, J. T. H., Schlatter, W., and Hartmann, J. (2011). “Geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system: Synthesis report.” Rep. No. FHWA-HRT-11-027, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.
Adams, M. T., Schlatter, W., and Stabile, T. (2007). “Geosynthetic-reinforced soil integrated abutments at the Bowman Road Bridge in Defiance County, Ohio.” Proc., Geo-Denver 2007, ASCE, Reston, VA.
ASTM. (1986). “Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method.” D4595, West Conshohocken, PA.
Athanasopoulos, G. A. (1993). “Effect of particle size on the mechanical behavior of sand-geotextile composite.” J. Geotextile Geomembr., 12(3), 255–273.
Bassett, A. K., and Last, N. C. (1978). “Reinforcing Earth below footings and embankments.” Proc., ASCE Spring Convention and Exhibit, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Bathurst, R. J., Cai, Z., Alfaro, M., and Pelletier, M. (1997). “Seismic design issues for geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining walls.” Mechanically stabilized backfill, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 79–97.
Elton, D. J., and Patawaran, M. A. B. (2004). “Mechanically stabilized earth reinforcement tensile strength from tests of geotextile-reinforced soil.” Transportation Research Record 1868,Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 81–88.
Gray, D. H., and Ohashi, H. (1983). “Mechanics of fiber reinforcement in sand.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 109(3), 335–353.
Hausmann, M. R. (1976). “Strength of reinforced soil,” Proc., 8th Australia Road Research Board Conf., Vol. 8, Australian Road Research Board, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Section 13, 1–8.
Hermann, L. R., and Al-Yassin, Z. (1978). “Numerical analysis of reinforced soil systems.” Proc., Symp. on Earth Reinforcement, ASCE, Reston, VA, 428–457.
Holtz, R. D., Christopher, B. R., and Berg, R. (1997). Geosynthetic engineering, BiTech Publishers, Vancouver, Canada.
Ingold, T. S. (1982). Reinforced earth, Thomas Telford, London.
Ketchart, K., and Wu, J. T. H. (2001). “Performance test for geosynthetic reinforced soil including effects of preloading.” Rep. FHWA-RD-01-018, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Maher, M. H., and Woods, R. D. (1990). “Dynamic response of sand reinforced with randomly distributed fibers.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 116(7), 1116–1131.
Pham, T. Q. (2009). “Investigating composite behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) mass.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Colorado, Denver.
Schlosser, F., and Long, N. T. (1974). “Recent results in French research on reinforced earth.” J. Constr. Div., 100(3), 223–237.
Wu, J. T. H. (1994). “Design and construction of low cost retaining walls: The next generation in technology.” CTI-UCD-1-94, Colorado Transportation Institute, Denver.
Wu, J. T. H. (2001). “Revising the AASHTO guidelines for design and construction of GRS walls.” Rep. No. CDOT-DTD-R-2001-16, Colorado DOT, Denver.
Wu, J. T. H., Adams, M. T., Pham, T. Q., Lee, S. H., and Ma, C. Y. (2012). “A generic soil-geosynthetic composite test.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng., 6(1), 103–116.
Wu, J. T. H., Ketchart, K., and Adams, M. T. (2008). “Two full-scale loading experiments of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutment wall.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng., 2(4), 303–316.
Wu, J. T. H., Lee, K. Z. Z., Helwany, S. B., and Ketchart, K. (2006). “Design and construction guidelines for GRS bridge abutment with a flexible facing.” Rep. 556, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Wu, J. T. H., Ma, C. Y., Pham, T. Q., and Adams, M. T. (2011). “Required minimum reinforcement stiffness and strength in geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls and abutments.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng., 5(4), 395–404.
Yang, Z. (1972). “Strength and deformation characteristics of reinforced sand.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
Ziegler, M., Heerten, G., and Ruiken, G. (2008). “Progress in the understanding of geosynthetic/soil composite material behaviour in geosynthetic reinforced earth structures.” Proc., 1st Pan American Geosynthetics Conf. and Exhibition, International Geosynthetics Society, Jupiter, FL.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 139 • Issue 9 • September 2013
Pages: 1468 - 1476
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 8, 2012
Accepted: Jan 2, 2013
Published online: Jan 12, 2013
Published in print: Sep 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.