Seismic Performance Analysis of Gravity Dam System under Arbitrary Oblique Incidence of Near-Fault SV Ground Motions
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22, Issue 12
Abstract
This study aims to propose a seismic performance analysis framework based on the oblique incidence theory, estimate a normalized damage response (RDVR) through seismic parameters and incident angles, and explore the variation in dynamic responses of concrete dams with arbitrary incident angles under near-fault vertically polarized shear (SV) waves. Several near-fault pulse-like records were selected, and their decomposed nonpulse (residual) components were used to guarantee the similarity of the response spectra. Furthermore, a seismic input model of the SV wave oblique incidence was developed based on the viscous-spring artificial boundary method, and its accuracy was verified using a numerical application. The effects of the incident angles of SV waves (−30° to 30° at 5° intervals), seismic intensity, and polarity on the damage and displacement responses of a gravity dam–reservoir–foundation system under pulse-like and nonpulse motions were studied. Additionally, the relationships between the incident angle, seismic characteristics [including the peak ground velocity to peak ground acceleration (PGV/PGA) ratio and spectral acceleration Sa(T1)], and the proposed RDVR were established. The most unfavorable incidence angles for different cases were derived. The numerical results showed that the negative direction (from downstream to upstream) has a significant effect on the nonlinear responses of a dam. The seismic features of PGV/PGA exhibited a better correlation with RDVR than Sa(T1). Subsequently, the damage to the gravity dam was estimated using the multivariate fitted method according to the proposed prediction model. The results showed that the proposed prediction model with arbitrary incident angles provides a good estimation of the real results. Thus, it is important to consider the coupled effect of incident angles and seismological characteristics in the seismic assessment of concrete dams located in near-fault regions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52192672 and 52079025).
References
Akköse, M., and E. Şimşek. 2010. “Non-linear seismic response of concrete gravity dams to near-fault ground motions including dam-water–sediment–foundation interaction.” Appl. Math. Modell. 34 (11): 3685–3700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.019.
Alembagheri, M., and M. Ghaemian. 2013. “Damage assessment of a concrete arch dam through nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 44: 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.09.010.
Alembagheri, M., and M. Seyedkazemi. 2015. “Seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of gravity dams.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (1): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2457.
Baker, J. W. 2007. “Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97 (5): 1486–1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
Calayir, Y., and M. Karaton. 2005. “A continuum damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dam–reservoir systems.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 25 (11): 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.05.003.
Chen, L., and L. Zhang. 2014. “A seismic wave oblique incidence method and the application in gravity dam seismic research.” J. Earthquake Tsunami 8 (4): 1450011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431114500110.
Hariri-Ardebili, M. A., S. M. Seyed-Kolbadi, and M. R. Kianoush. 2016. “FEM-based parametric analysis of a typical gravity dam considering input excitation mechanism.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 84: 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.01.013.
Huang, J.-q., X.-l. Du, M. Zhao, and X. Zhao. 2017. “Impact of incident angles of earthquake shear (s) waves on 3-D non-linear seismic responses of long lined tunnels.” Eng. Geol. 222: 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.03.017.
Lee, J., and G. L. Fenves. 1998. “A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27 (9): 937–956. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199809)27:9%3C937::AID-EQE764%3E3.0.CO;2-5.
Liao, Z. P., and J. B. Liu. 1986. “Elastic wave motion in discrete grids.” [In Chinese.] Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 6 (2): 1–16.
Liu, J. B., Y. X. Du, X. L. Du, Z. Y. Wang, and J. Wu. 2006. “3D viscous-spring artificial boundary in time domain.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 5 (1): 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-006-0585-2.
Lyu, D., S. Ma, C. Yu, C. Liu, X. Wang, B. Yang, and M. Xiao. 2020. “Effects of oblique incidence of SV waves on nonlinear seismic response of a lined arched tunnel.” Shock Vib. 2020 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8093804.
Pan, J. 2019. “Seismic damage behavior of gravity dams under the effect of concrete inhomogeneity.” J. Earthquake Eng. 25 (7): 1438–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1581675.
Pang, R., B. Xu, X. Kong, Y. Zhou, and D. Zou. 2018. “Seismic performance evaluation of high CFRD slopes subjected to near-fault ground motions based on generalized probability density evolution method.” Eng. Geol. 246: 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.004.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2005. Peer strong motion database. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Qiu, D., J. Chen, and Q. Xu. 2019. “Dynamic responses and damage forms analysis of underground large scale frame structures under oblique SV seismic waves.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 117: 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.032.
Shahi, S. K., and J. W. Baker. 2014. “An efficient algorithm to identify strong-velocity pulses in multicomponent ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 104 (5): 2456–2466. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130191.
Sun, B., M. Deng, S. Zhang, W. Cui, C. Wang, L. Yu, and K. Cao. 2020a. “Inelastic dynamic analysis and damage assessment of a hydraulic arched tunnel under near-fault SV waves with arbitrary incoming angles.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 104: 103523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103523.
Sun, B., S. Zhang, M. Deng, and C. Wang. 2020b. “Inelastic dynamic response and fragility analysis of arched hydraulic tunnels under as-recorded far-fault and near-fault ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 132: 106070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106070.
Wang, G., Y. Wang, W. Lu, P. Yan, and M. Chen. 2018. “Earthquake direction effects on seismic performance of concrete gravity dams to mainshock–aftershock sequences.” J. Earthquake Eng. 24 (7): 1134–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1453423.
Wang, G., Y. Wang, W. Lu, P. Yan, W. Zhou, and M. Chen. 2016a. “A general definition of integrated strong motion duration and its effect on seismic demands of concrete gravity dams.” Eng. Struct. 125: 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.033.
Wang, G., S. Zhang, C. Wang, and M. Yu. 2014. “Seismic performance evaluation of dam–reservoir–foundation systems to near-fault ground motions.” Nat. Hazards 72 (2): 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-1028-9.
Wang, J.-T., A.-Y. Jin, X.-L. Du, and M.-X. Wu. 2016b. “Scatter of dynamic response and damage of an arch dam subjected to artificial earthquake accelerograms.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 87: 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.05.003.
Wang, X., J. Chen, and M. Xiao. 2019. “Seismic responses of an underground powerhouse structure subjected to oblique incidence SV and P waves.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 119: 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.014.
Xu, Q., S. Xu, J. Chen, and J. Li. 2021. “Dimensionless analysis of pulse-like effects on the seismic behavior of a dam based on wavelet-decomposed near-fault ground motions.” Structures 33 (1): 2003–2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.069.
Yazdani, Y., and M. Alembagheri. 2017a. “Nonlinear seismic response of a gravity dam under near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92: 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.003.
Yazdani, Y., and M. Alembagheri. 2017b. “Seismic vulnerability of gravity dams in near-fault areas.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 102: 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.020.
Zhang, J., M. Li, and S. Han. 2022. “Seismic analysis of gravity dam–layered foundation system subjected to earthquakes with arbitrary incident angles.” Int. J. Geomech. 22 (2): 04021279. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002268.
Zhang, J., M. Li, S. Han, and G. Deng. 2021. “Estimation of seismic wave incident angle using vibration response data and stacking ensemble algorithm.” Comput. Geotech. 137: 104255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104255.
Zhang, J., M. Zhang, M. Li, Q. Min, B. Shi, and L. Song. 2020. “Nonlinear dynamic response of a CC-RCC combined dam structure under oblique incidence of near-fault ground motions.” Appl. Sci. 10 (3): 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030885.
Zhang, S., and G. Wang. 2013. “Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 53: 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.014.
Zhou, X., Q. Liang, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, and Y. He. 2019. “Three-dimensional nonlinear seismic response of immersed tunnel in horizontally layered site under obliquely incident SV waves.” Shock Vibr. 2019 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3131502.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 11, 2022
Accepted: Jul 1, 2022
Published online: Oct 11, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 11, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.