A Novel Index to Evaluate the Workability of Conditioned Coarse-Grained Soil for EPB Shield Tunnelling
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148, Issue 6
Abstract
Although slump testing has been used extensively to assess the workability of conditioned soil in shield-driven tunnelling, this traditional evaluation method still requires many subjective descriptions. This study developed a novel and objective index to assess the workability of conditioned coarse-grained soil. A series of slump tests was performed on gravely sands with different conditioning parameters. The test results suggested that foam conditioning was suitable only for sands (lacking fine grains) with low water contents. Inspired by the observation that appropriately conditioned soils usually form a platform with a certain diameter on the top of slumped specimens, a novel evaluation index is proposed to evaluate the workability of conditioned coarse-grained soil. In contrast to the traditional method of using slump value to assess conditioned coarse-grained soil, a prominent advantage of this method is that it eliminates the need to judge whether water or foam bleeds from slumped specimens, and thus it is easier to implement on construction sites. The results of verifications with theoretical analysis and field applications on a construction site confirmed that this new method is practically effective for evaluating the conditioning state of coarse-grained soil in mechanized tunnelling with earth pressure balance (EPB) shield machines. The proposed index provides a simple but quantitative evaluation perspective for the workability of conditioned soils, and thus is of significant engineering value.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author upon request. (experimental data in the figure)
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52022112, 51778637, and 52108388) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (Grant No. 2021zzts0240).
References
ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. ASTM C143/C143M-12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Avunduk, E., and H. Copur. 2018. “Empirical modeling for predicting excavation performance of EPB TBM based on soil properties.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 71 (Jan): 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.016.
Budach, C., and M. Thewes. 2015. “Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 50 (Aug): 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.006.
Cattaneo, S., and F. Mola. 2012. “Assessing the quality control of self-consolidating concrete properties.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (2): 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000410.
de Oliveira, D. G. G., M. Thewes, M. S. Diederichs, and L. Langmaack. 2019. “Consistency index and its correlation with EPB excavation of mixed clay–sand soils.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 37 (1): 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0612-x.
EFNARC (European Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and Concrete Systems). 2005. “Specifications and guidelines for the use of specialist products for mechanized tunnelling (TBM) in soft ground and hard rock.” In Recommendation of European federation of producers and contractors of specialist products for structures. Farnham, UK: EFNARC.
Hu, Q., S. Wang, T. Qu, T. Xu, S. Huang, and H. Wang. 2020. “Effect of hydraulic gradient on the permeability characteristics of foam-conditioned sand for mechanized tunnelling.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol. 99 (4): 103377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103377.
Huang, S., S. Wang, C. Xu, Y. Shi, and F. Ye. 2019. “Effect of grain gradation on the permeability characteristics of coarse-grained soil conditioned with foam for EPB shield tunneling.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23 (11): 4662–4674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0717-7.
Jancsecz, S., R. Krause, and L. Langmaack. 1999. “Advantages of soil conditioning in shield tunnelling: Experiences of LRTS Izmir.” In Challenges for the 21st century, edited by T. Alten, L. Backer, P. Bollingmo, E. Broch, K. Holmoy, K. G. Holter, and K. Nielsen, 865–875. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Kam, S. I., and W. R. Rossen. 2002. “The compressibility of foamy sands.” Colloids Surf., A 202 (1): 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(01)01059-7.
Kim, T.-H., B.-K. Kim, K.-H. Lee, and I.-M. Lee. 2019. “Soil conditioning of weathered granite soil used for EPB shield TBM: A laboratory scale study.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23 (4): 1829–1838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1484-1.
Langmaack, L. 2000. “Advanced technology of soil conditioning in EPB shield tunnelling.” In Proc., North American Tunneling, 525–542. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Li, P., D. Huang, J. Huang, and W. Ding. 2016. “Experimental study on soil conditioning of shield construction in hard-plastic high-viscosity layer.” J. Tongji Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 44 (1): 59–66.
Liu, P., S. Wang, L. Ge, M. Thewes, J. Yang, and Y. Xia. 2018. “Changes of Atterberg limits and electrochemical behaviors of clays with dispersants as conditioning agents for EPB shield tunnelling.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 73 (Mar): 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.12.026.
Liu, P., S. Wang, Y. Shi, J. Yang, J. Fu, and F. Yang. 2019. “Tangential adhesion strength between clay and steel for various soil softnesses.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (5): 04019048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002680.
Maidl, B., M. Herrenknecht, U. Maidl, and G. Wehrmeyer. 2013. Mechanised shield tunnelling. New York: Wiley.
Martinelli, D., D. Peila, and E. Campa. 2015. “Feasibility study of tar sands conditioning for earth pressure balance tunnelling.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 7 (6): 684–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.09.002.
Milligan, G. 2000. Lubrication and soil conditioning in tunnelling, pipe jacking and microtunnelling: A state-of-the-art review. London: Geotechnical Consulting Group.
Mori, L., M. Mooney, and M. Cha. 2018. “Characterizing the influence of stress on foam conditioned sand for EPB tunneling.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 71 (Jan): 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.018.
Peila, D., C. Oggeri, and L. Borio. 2009. “Using the slump test to assess the behavior of conditioned soil for EPB tunneling.” Environ. Eng. Geosci. 15 (3): 167–174. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.15.3.167.
Qiu, Y., X. Yang, Z. Tang, and Y. Li. 2015. Soil improvement for earth pressure balance shields construction in watered sandy stratum. Shanghai, China: Journal of Tongji Univ.
Qu, T., S. Wang, J. Fu, Q. Hu, and X. Zhang. 2019a. “Numerical examination of EPB shield tunneling–induced responses at various discharge ratios.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 33 (3): 04019035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001300.
Qu, T., S. Wang, and Q. Hu. 2019b. “Coupled discrete element-finite difference method for analysing effects of cohesionless soil conditioning on tunneling behaviour of EPB shield.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23 (10): 4538–4552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0473-8.
Quebaud, S., M. Sibai, and J.-P. Henry. 1998. “Use of chemical foam for improvements in drilling by earth-pressure balanced shields in granular soils.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 13 (2): 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00045-5.
Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. 2007. Standard for engineering classification of soil. GB/T50145-2007. Beijing: Chinese Standard.
Tao, L., Z. Chen, J. Cui, H. Wang, and Y. Fang. 2019. “Experimental methods to assess the effectiveness of soil conditioning with foam in fully weathered granite.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019 (Apr): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9046704.
Vinai, R., C. Oggeri, and D. Peila. 2008. “Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: A laboratory research.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 23 (3): 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.010.
Wan, Z., S. Li, C. Yuan, S. Zhao, M. Wang, Q. Lu, and W. Hou. 2021. “Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunneling in silty clay and weathered mudstone.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (9): 06021020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002119.
Wang, H., S. Wang, J. Zhong, T. Qu, Z. Liu, T. Xu, and P. Liu. 2021a. “Undrained compressibility characteristics and pore pressure calculation model of foam-conditioned sand.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 118 (Dec): 104161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104161.
Wang, S., Q. Hu, H. Wang, M. Thewes, L. Ge, J. Yang, and P. Liu. 2021b. “Permeability characteristics of poorly graded sand conditioned with foam in different conditioning states.” J. Test. Eval. 49 (5): 3620–3636. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20190539.
Wang, S., P. Liu, Q. Hu, and J. Zhong. 2020. “Effect of dispersant on the tangential adhesion strength between clay and metal for EPB shield tunnelling.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 95 (Jan): 103144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103144.
Wei, Y., Y. Yang, M. Tao, D. Wang, and Y. Jie. 2020. “Earth pressure balance shield tunneling in sandy gravel deposits: A case study of application of soil conditioning.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 79 (9): 5013–5030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01856-1.
Wu, Y., M. A. Mooney, and M. Cha. 2018. “An experimental examination of foam stability under pressure for EPB TBM tunneling.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 77 (Jul): 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.02.011.
Xu, Q., L. Zhang, H. Zhu, Z. Gong, J. Liu, and Y. Zhu. 2020. “Laboratory tests on conditioning the sandy cobble soil for EPB shield tunnelling and its field application.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 105 (Nov): 103512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103512.
Ye, X., S. Wang, J. Yang, D. Sheng, and C. Xiao. 2017. “Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunneling in argillaceous siltstone with high content of clay minerals: Case study.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (4): 05016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000791.
Zhao, B., D. Liu, and B. Jiang. 2018. “Soil conditioning of waterless sand–pebble stratum in EPB tunnel construction.” Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 36 (4): 2495–2504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0478-y.
Zhen, Z., X. Ge, and J. Zhang. 2021. “Soil conditioning tests on sandy and cobbly soil for shield tunneling.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 25 (4): 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0921-0.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148 • Issue 6 • June 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 24, 2021
Accepted: Feb 8, 2022
Published online: Mar 24, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 24, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Shuying Wang, Yongjie Zhan, Tongming Qu, Tong Qiu, Haibo Wang, Effect of Gradation on Undrained Compressibility of Foam-Conditioned Coarse-Grained Soils, International Journal of Geomechanics, 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8163, 23, 7, (2023).