Abstract

To reduce pressure fluctuations in the excavation chamber during earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling, it is necessary to inject foam into excavated soil to improve its compressibility. However, the effect of grain gradation on the undrained compressibility of foam-conditioned soil remains elusive. In this study, a series of one-dimensional undrained compression tests using a custom-designed large-scale compression device were carried out to study the role of grain gradation on the compressibility characteristics of foam-conditioned coarse-grained soils. The results demonstrated that the compressibility decreased with an increase in grain diameter (d60) and uniformity coefficient (Cu) but with a decrease in the coefficient of curvature (Cc). In the unloading stage, with higher d60 and Cc but lower Cu, the void ratio and pore pressure initially stayed constant with a larger range of total vertical stress (σv), but the effective vertical stress σv sharply decreased to zero at lower σv. With further unloading, pore pressure (u) and total lateral stress (σL) started to decline significantly at lower σv. With higher d60 and Cc but lower Cu, there were lower lateral pressure and total lateral pressure coefficients, indicating a lower workability of muck. Although the foam injection ratio of 20% was not sufficiently high to effect compression dominated by air in the early loading stage, the soil showed air-governed behavior in the unloading stage when e/emax became larger than et/emax, which was approximately equal to 1.0, regardless of soil gradation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52022112 and 51778637) is acknowledged and appreciated.

References

Al-Taie, A., M. Disfani, and E. Yaghoubi. 2021. “Suitability of swelling and collapse theory proposed based on virgin compression surface.” Soils Found. 61 (1): 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.11.003.
ASTM. 2006. Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of saturated cohesive soils using controlled-strain loading. ASTM D4186-06. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bezuijen, A., P. Schaminee, and J. A. Kleinjan. 1999. “Additive testing for earth pressure balance shields.” In Proc., 12th European Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 1991–1996. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Budach, C. 2012. Untersuchungen zum erweiterten Einsatz von Erddruckschilden in grobkörnigem Lockergestein. German: Univ. of Bochum.
Budach, C., and M. Thewes. 2015. “Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 50: 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.006.
Duarte, P. 2007. Foam as a soil conditioner in tunnelling: Physical and mechanical properties of conditioned sands. Oxford, UK: Univ. of Oxford.
EFNARC (European Federation of National Associations Representing Producers and Applicators of Specialist Building Products for Concrete). 2005. Specification and guidelines for the use of specialist products for soft ground tunneling. Farnham, UK: EFNARC.
Hajialilue-Bonab, M., H. Sabetamal, H. Katebi, and M. Ahmadi-Adli. 2008. “Experimental study on compressibility behavior of foamed sandy soil.” In Proc., 6th Int. Symp. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground. Shanghai: Tongji University.
Hu, Q., S. Wang, T. Qu, T. Xu, and H. Wang. 2020. “Effect of hydraulic gradient on the permeability characteristics of foam-conditioned sand for mechanized tunnelling.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 99 (4): 103377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103377.
Hu, W., and J. Rostami. 2021. “Evaluating rheology of conditioned soil using commercially available surfactants (foam) for simulation of material flow through EPB machine.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 112: 103881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103881.
Huang, S., S. Wang, C. Xu, Y. Shi, and F. Ye. 2019. “Effect of grain gradation on the permeability characteristics of coarse-grained soil conditioned with foam for EPB shield tunneling.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23 (11): 4662–4674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0717-7.
Kaptay, G. 2006. “On the equation of the maximum capillary pressure induced by solid particles to stabilize emulsions and foams and on the emulsion stability diagrams.” Colloids Surf., A 282–283: 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.12.021.
Ling, F., S. Wang, Q. Hu, S. Huang, and Z. Feng. 2022. “Effect of bentonite slurry on the function of foam for changing the permeability characteristics of sand under high hydraulic gradients.” Can. Geotech. J. 59 (7): 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0196.
Mori, L., M. Mooney, and M. Cha. 2018. “Characterizing the influence of stress on foam conditioned sand for EPB tunneling.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 71: 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.018.
Mori, L., Y. Wu, M. Cha, and M. A. Mooney. 2015. “Measuring the compressibility and shear strength of conditioned sand under pressure.” In Proc., Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conf. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration. Golden, CO: Colorado School of Mines.
Psomas, S. 2001. Properties of foam/sand mixtures for tunnelling applications. Oxford, UK: Univ. of Oxford.
Qu, T., S. Wang, J. Fu, Q. Hu, and X. Zhang. 2019. “Numerical examination of EPB shield tunneling–induced responses at various discharge ratios.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 33 (3): 04019035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001300.
Wan, Z., S. Li, C. Yuan, S. Zhao, M. Wang, Q. Lu, and W. Hou. 2021. “Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunneling in silty clay and weathered mudstone.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (9): 06021020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002119.
Wang, H., S. Wang, J. Zhong, T. Qu, Z. Liu, T. Xu, and P. Liu. 2021a. “Undrained compressibility characteristics and pore pressure calculation model of foam-conditioned sand.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 118: 104161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104161.
Wang, S., Q. Hu, H. Wang, M. Thews, L. Ge, J. Yang, and P. Liu. 2021b. “Permeability characteristics of poorly graded sand conditioned with foam in different conditioning states.” J. Test. Eval. 49 (5): 3620–3636. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20190539.
Wang, S., S. Huang, J. Zhong, S. Zhang, Q. Hu, T. Qu, and X. Ye. 2020a. “Permeability stability calculation model of foam-conditioned soil based on the permeability constant.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 45 (4): 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3166.
Wang, S., S. Huang, T. Qiu, J. Yang, J. Zhong, and Q. Hu. 2020b. “Analytical study of the permeability of a foam-conditioned soil.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (8): 06020019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001750.
Wang, S., Z. Ni, T. Qu, H. Wang, and Q. Pan. 2022. “A novel index to evaluate the workability of conditioned coarse-grained soil for EPB shield tunnelling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (6): 04022028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002287.
Wang, S., T. Qu, Y. Fang, J. Fu, and J. Yang. 2019. “Stress responses associated with earth pressure balance shield tunneling in dry granular ground using the discrete-element method.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (7): 04019060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001434.
Wu, Y., A. Nazem, F. Meng, and M. A. Mooney. 2020. “Experimental study on the stability of foam-conditioned sand under pressure in the EPBM chamber.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 106: 103590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103590.
Yang, Y., X. Li, and X. Li. 2018. “Shear strength and compression coefficient for conditioned sand subjected to earth chamber stress levels.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018: 1–11.
Ye, X., S. Wang, J. Yang, D. Sheng, and C. Xiao. 2017. “Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunneling in argillaceous siltstone with high content of clay minerals: Case study.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (4): 05016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000791.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 7July 2023

History

Received: Jul 1, 2022
Accepted: Dec 19, 2022
Published online: May 3, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 3, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shuying Wang, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Central South Univ., Changsha 410075, China; Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Rail Transit Engineering Structures, Central South Univ., Changsha 410075, China; Tunnel and Underground Engineering Research Center of Central South Univ., Changsha 410075, China. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Central South Univ., Changsha 410075, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-3342. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Clearwater Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-8282. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2516-6851. Email: [email protected]
Doctoral Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen Univ., Guangzhou 510275, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share