Technical Papers
Nov 10, 2021

Upscaling Complex Project-Level Infrastructure Intervention Planning to Network Assets

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148, Issue 1

Abstract

Probabilistic and nonlinear models have been used to accurately model various phenomena in asset management systems (AMS). With a commonly adopted framework using Monte Carlo simulation and heuristic algorithms, AMS proposed in the literature aim to maintain the functionality of assets in their life-cycle by optimally allocating limited resources to different intervention actions. However, due to their high computational costs, upscaling complex project-level AMS to a multitude of assets currently is far from practical. To address this gap between the literature and the practice of project-level AMS, this paper presents a new machine learning–based methodology to estimate (near-)optimal intervention timings which usually are derived by optimization algorithms. To illustrate, an ensemble of random forests models was trained on optimal maintenance timings of more than 1.6 million semisynthesized bridges. The trained model yielded optimized maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction (MRR) plans with greater than 95% accuracy on the test set and greater than 89% accuracy on more than 4,600 highway bridges in Indiana, and did so 6 orders of magnitude faster than the conventional framework of complex MRR optimization. Practitioners can adopt the proposed methodology to enhance their decision-making systems, obtain optimal maintenance plans without sacrificing complex and accurate models, and take another step toward sustainability objectives.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Altarabsheh, A., K. Amr, and V. Mario. 2018a. “New multiobjective optimization approach to rehabilitate and maintain sewer networks based on whole lifecycle behavior.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (1): 04017069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000715.
Altarabsheh, A., V. Mario, and K. Amr. 2018b. “New approach for critical pipe prioritization in wastewater asset management planning.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (5): 04018044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000784.
Arif, F., M. E. Bayraktar, and A. G. Chowdhury. 2015. “Decision support framework for infrastructure maintenance investment decision making.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (1): 04015030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000372.
ASCE. 2021. 2021 report card for America’s infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Asghari, V. 2020. “XProject.” Accessed June 2, 2021. https://github.com/vd1371/XProject.
Asghari, V. 2021. “EstOpt.” Accessed October 28, 2021. https://github.com/vd1371/EstOpt.
Asghari, V., and S.-C. Hsu. 2020. “GIAMS: A general infrastructure asset management system.” Accessed January 6, 2021. https://github.com/vd1371/GIAMS.
Asghari, V., and S.-C. Hsu. 2021. “An open-source and extensible platform for general infrastructure asset management system.” Autom. Constr. 127 (Jul): 103692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103692.
Asghari, V., S.-C. Hsu, and H.-H. Wei. 2021a. “Expediting life cycle cost analysis of infrastructure assets under multiple uncertainties by deep neural networks.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (6): 04021059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000950.
Asghari, V., H. Kashani, and S.-C. Hsu. 2021b. “Optimal timing of the seismic vulnerability reduction measures using real options analysis.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng. 7 (3): 04021027. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001146.
Asghari, V., Y. F. Leung, and S.-C. Hsu. 2020. “Deep neural network based framework for complex correlations in engineering metrics.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 44 (Apr): 101058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101058.
Bai, Q., S. Labi, K. C. Sinha, and P. D. Thompson. 2013. “Multiobjective optimization for project selection in network-level bridge management incorporating decision-maker’s preference using the concept of holism.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (9): 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000428.
Branco, P., L. Torgo, and R. P. Ribeiro. 2019. “Pre-processing approaches for imbalanced distributions in regression.” Neurocomputing 343 (May): 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.11.100.
Breiman, L. 2001. “Random forests.” Mach. Learn. 45 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. 2017. Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
Campos, R. M., M. O. Costa, F. Almeida, and C. Guedes Soares. 2021. “Operational wave forecast selection in the Atlantic Ocean using random forests.” J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9 (3): 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9030298.
Chawla, N., K. Bowyer, L. Hall, and W. Kegelmeyer. 2002. “SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique.” J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16: 321–357. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953.
Chen, L., and Q. Bai. 2019. “Optimization in decision making in infrastructure asset management: A review.” Appl. Sci. 9 (7): 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9071380.
Chen, L., T. F. P. Henning, A. Raith, and A. Y. Shamseldin. 2015. “Multiobjective optimization for maintenance decision making in infrastructure asset management.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (6): 04015015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000371.
Cheng, M., D. Y. Yang, and D. M. Frangopol. 2020. “Investigation of effects of time preference and risk perception on life-cycle management of civil infrastructure.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng. 6 (1): 04020001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001039.
Chicano, F., A. M. Sutton, L. D. Whitley, and E. Alba. 2015. “Fitness probability distribution of bit-flip mutation.” Evol. Comput. 23 (2): 217–248. https://doi.org/10.1162/EVCO_a_00130.
Elhadidy, A. A., E. E. Elbeltagi, and S. M. El-Badawy. 2020. “Network-based optimization system for pavement maintenance using a probabilistic simulation-based genetic algorithm approach.” J. Transp. Eng., Part B: Pavements 146 (4): 04020069. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000237.
Ellingham, I., and W. Fawcett. 2007. New generation whole-life costing: Property and construction decision-making under uncertainty. London: Taylor & Francis.
FEMA. 2003. Hazus–MH 2.1 technical manual. Washington DC: FEMA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2012. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges. Washington, DC: FHWA.
France-Mensah, J., and W. J. O’Brien. 2018. “Budget allocation models for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation: Comparative case study.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (2): 05018002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000599.
Frangopol, D. M. 2011. “Life-cycle performance, management, and optimisation of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (6): 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732471003594427.
Ghodoosi, F., S. Abu-Samra, M. Zeynalian, and T. Zayed. 2018. “Maintenance cost optimization for bridge structures using system reliability analysis and genetic algorithms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2): 04017116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001435.
Grefenstette, J. J. 1986. “Optimization of control parameters for genetic algorithms.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 16 (1): 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1986.289288.
Hawk, H., and E. P. Small. 1998. “The BRIDGIT bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. 8 (4): 309–314. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686698780488712.
Kandil, A., K. El-Rayes, and O. El-Anwar. 2010. “Optimization research: Enhancing the robustness of large-scale multiobjective optimization in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000140.
Kim, S., and D. M. Frangopol. 2018. “Decision making for probabilistic fatigue inspection planning based on multi-objective optimization.” Int. J. Fatigue 111 (Jun): 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.027.
Lagaros, N. D., K. Kepaptsoglou, and M. G. Karlaftis. 2013. “Fund allocation for civil infrastructure security upgrade.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (2): 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000133.
Li, Y., Y. Dong, D. M. Frangopol, and D. Gautam. 2020. “Long-term resilience and loss assessment of highway bridges under multiple natural hazards.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (4): 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1699936.
Mahsuli, M., and T. Haukaas. 2013. “Computer program for multimodel reliability and optimization analysis.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 27 (1): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000204.
McGuire, R. 2004. Seismic hazard and risk analysis. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
McLaughlin, M., N. Charron, and S. Narasimhan. 2020. “Automated defect quantification in concrete bridges using robotics and deep learning.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 34 (5): 04020029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000915.
Miyamoto, A., K. Kawamura, and H. Nakamura. 2000. “Bridge management system and maintenance optimization for existing bridges.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00170.
Moghaddam, A. S., E. Rezazadeh Azar, Y. Mejias, and H. Bell. 2020. “Estimating stripping of asphalt coating using k-means clustering and machine learning–based classification.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 34 (1): 04019044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000864.
Montazeri, N., and A. Touran. 2019. “Applied decision-making framework for maintenance scheduling in bridge management.” In Proc., Creative Construction Conf., 547–555. Budapest, Hungary: Budapest Univ. of Technology and Economics.
Ng, A. 2018. “Machine learning yearning.” Accessed October 28, 2021. https://www.deeplearning.ai.
Pai, S. G. S., M. Sanayei, and I. F. C. Smith. 2021. “Model-class selection using clustering and classification for structural identification and prediction.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 35 (1): 04020051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000932.
Patidar, V., S. Labi, T. Morin, P. D. Thompson, and K. C. Sinha. 2011. “Evaluating methods and algorithms for multicriteria bridge management at the network level.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2220 (1): 38–47. https://doi.org/10.3141/2220-05.
Pedregosa, F., et al. 2011. “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12: 2825–2830.
Rahimi, H., and M. Mahsuli. 2019. “Structural reliability approach to analysis of probabilistic seismic hazard and its sensitivities.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (3): 1331–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0497-3.
Redmon, J., S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi. 2016. “You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection.” In Proc., IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Santa Clara, CA: Nvidia.
Renna, P. 2017. “A decision investment model to design manufacturing systems based on a genetic algorithm and Monte-Carlo simulation.” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 30 (6): 590–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2016.1187299.
Ryan, T. W., J. E. Mann, M. Z. Chill, and T. B. Ott. 2012. Bridge inspector’s reference manual. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Association.
Sánchez-Silva, M., D. M. Frangopol, J. Padgett, and M. Soliman. 2016. “Maintenance and operation of infrastructure systems: Review.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (9): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001543.
Saydam, D., and D. M. Frangopol. 2015. “Risk-based maintenance optimization of deteriorating bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. (United States) 141 (4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001038.
Sinha, K. C., S. A. Labi, B. G. McCullouch, A. Bhargava, and B. Qiang. 2009. Updating and enhancing the Indiana bridge management system (IBMS). West Lafayette, IN: Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana DOT and Purdue Univ.
TexasDOT. 2021. “Road user costs.” Accessed October 28, 2021. https://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/construction/road-user-costs.html.
Thompson, P. D., E. P. Small, M. Johnson, and A. R. Marshall. 1998. “The Pontis bridge management system” Structural Eng. Int. 8 (4): 303–308. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686698780488758.
Wang, R., V. Asghari, S.-C. Hsu, C.-J. Lee, and J.-H. Chen. 2020. “Detecting corporate misconduct through random forest in China’s construction industry.” J. Cleaner Prod. 268 (Sep): 122266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122266.
Witt, C. 2013. “Tight bounds on the optimization time of a randomized search heuristic on linear functions.” Comb. Probab. Comput. 22 (2): 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963548312000600.
Wu, J., and J. Zhang. 2019. “New automated BIM object classification method to support BIM interoperability.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 33 (5): 04019033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000858.
Yang, D. Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2020. “Life-cycle management of deteriorating bridge networks with network-level risk bounds and system reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf. 83 (Mar): 101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101911.
Yang, D. Y., D. M. Frangopol, and J.-G. Teng. 2019. “Probabilistic life-cycle optimization of durability-enhancing maintenance actions: Application to FRP strengthening planning.” Eng. Struct. 188 (Jun): 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.055.
Yang, I.-T., Y.-M. Hsieh, and L.-O. Kung. 2012. “Parallel computing platform for multiobjective simulation optimization of bridge maintenance planning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (2): 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000421.
Zangeneh, Z., H. Hamledari, and M. McCabe. 2020. “Quantifying remoteness for risk and resilience assessment using nighttime satellite imagery.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 34 (5): 04020026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000906.
Zhou, J., E. Li, H. Wei, C. Li, Q. Qiao, and D. J. Armaghani. 2019. “Random forests and cubist algorithms for predicting shear strengths of rockfill materials.” Appl. Sci. 9 (8): 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081621.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148Issue 1January 2022

History

Received: May 23, 2021
Accepted: Sep 30, 2021
Published online: Nov 10, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 10, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., 181 Chatham Rd. South, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2399-4592. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., 181 Chatham Rd. South, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7232-9839. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Project-Level Intervention Planning under Multiple Uncertainties, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-4883, 39, 2, (2023).
  • Comparison of Markovian-Based Bridge Deterioration Model Approaches, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5920, 28, 8, (2023).
  • Machine learning modeling for spectral transient-based leak detection, Automation in Construction, 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104686, 146, (104686), (2023).
  • Reinforcement Learning in Construction Engineering and Management: A Review, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002386, 148, 11, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share