Integrative Collaboration in Fragmented Project Organizations: Network Perspective
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 10
Abstract
Architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) project teams have a segmented organizational structure with subgroups, for example, designer, contractor, and owner. AEC projects are challenging to collaborate because they require those in different subgroups to address uniquely defined technical and functional contexts. The AEC industry often seeks integrated collaboration through organizational integration because the literature assumes that organizational structure determines collaboration structure. This study uses a network perspective to identify the inconsistency between the organization and collaboration networks through the data of email records from a $20 million AEC project with a typical fragmented organization. The analytical focus is on two network configurations: (1) a community structure through which subgroups are defined to attend to specific aspects of the project and then coordinated through ties between members of different teams; and (2) a core-periphery structure in which a relatively small number of members interact frequently in the core and then coordinate as each member of the core interacts with specific members of the periphery. Results provide evidence of integrated collaboration in fragmented project organization, indicating organizational integration is not a must to achieve integrative collaboration. The findings suggest implications to facilitate integrative collaboration: (1) efforts should focus on collaboration behaviors, (2) subgroups should adopt a dual-lead pattern, (3) subgroups should encourage non-high-profile members to function as cores, and (4) subgroups should ensure information sharing and prevent information overload.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Part of the data, models, and codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through Grant No. 1825678. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the researchers and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.
References
Ahmad, I., N. Azhar, and A. Chowdhury. 2019. “Enhancement of IPD characteristics as impelled by information and communication technology.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (1): 04018055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000670.
Albino, V., P. Pontrandolfo, and B. Scozzi. 2002. “Analysis of information flows to enhance the coordination of production processes.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 75 (1–2): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00177-3.
Berardo, R., and J. T. Scholz. 2010. “Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries.” Am. J. Political Sci. 54 (3): 632–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x.
Bilec, M., and R. Ries. 2007. “Preliminary study of green design and project delivery methods in the public sector.” J. Green Build. 2 (2): 151–160. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.2.2.151.
Boddy, D., D. Macbeth, and B. Wagner. 2000. “Implementing collaboration between organizations: An empirical study of supply chain partnering.” J. Manage. Stud. 37 (7): 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00214.
Borgatti, S. P., and M. G. Everett. 2000. “Models of core/periphery structures.” Social Networks 21 (4): 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2.
Boyd, J. P., W. J. Fitzgerald, and R. J. Beck. 2006. “Computing core/periphery structures and permutation tests for social relations data.” Social Networks 28 (2): 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.06.003.
Daft, R. L. 1978. “A dual-core model of organizational innovation.” Acad. Manage. J. 21 (2): 193–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/255754.
Dogan, S. Z., D. Arditi, S. Gunhan, and B. Erbasaranoglu. 2015. “Assessing coordination performance based on centrality in an e-mail communication network.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (3): 04014047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000255.
Du, J., D. Zhao, R. R. A. Issa, and N. Singh. 2020. “BIM for improved project communication networks: Empirical evidence from email logs.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 34 (5): 04020027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000912.
Du, J., D. Zhao, and O. Zhang. 2019. “Impacts of human communication network topology on group optimism bias in capital project planning: A human-subject experiment.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 37 (1): 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1508848.
Durugbo, C., W. Hutabarat, A. Tiwari, and J. R. Alcock. 2011. “Modelling collaboration using complex networks.” Inf. Sci. 181 (15): 3143–3161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.03.020.
Elghaish, F., and S. Abrishami. 2021. “A centralised cost management system: Exploiting EVM and ABC within IPD.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (2): 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2019-0623.
Frank, K., Y.-J. Lo, K. Torphy, and J. Kim. 2018a. “Social networks and educational opportunity.” In Handbook of the sociology of education in the 21st century, edited by B. Schneider, 297–316. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Frank, K. A. 1995. “Identifying cohesive subgroups.” Social Networks 17 (1): 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(94)00247-8.
Frank, K. A., and K. Fahrbach. 1999. “Organization culture as a complex system: Balance and information in models of influence and selection.” Organ. Sci. 10 (3): 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.253.
Frank, K. A., W. R. Penuel, and A. Krause. 2015. “What is a ‘good’ social network for policy implementation? The flow of know-how for organizational change.” J. Policy Anal. Manage. 34 (2): 378–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21817.
Frank, K. A., R. Xu, and W. R. Penuel. 2018b. “Implementation of evidence-based practice in human service organizations: Implications from agent-based models.” J. Policy Anal. Manage. 37 (4): 867–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22081.
Freeman, R. E., J. S. Harrison, and A. C. Wicks. 2007. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Friedman, A. L., and S. Miles. 2002. “Developing stakeholder theory.” J. Manage. Stud. 39 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280.
Garcia, A. J., M. Duva, S. Mollaoglu, D. Zhao, K. Frank, and J. Benitez. 2020. “Expertise flows and network structures in AEC project teams.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress (CRC). Reston, VA: ASCE.
Gimenez, J. 2006. “Embedded business emails: Meeting new demands in international business communication.” Engl. Specific Purposes 25 (2): 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.005.
Goldgeier, J. M., and M. McFaul. 1992. “A tale of two worlds: Core and periphery in the post-cold war era.” Int. Organ. 46 (2): 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027788.
Hall, D. M. 2018. “Cracks in the mirror: Conceptualizing the ongoing AEC industry re-organization.” In Proc., 16th Engineering Project Organization Conf. (EPOC), 458–477. Louisville, CO: Engineering Project Organization Society.
Hansen, M. T. 1999. “The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits.” Administrative Sci. Q. 44 (1): 82–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032.
Huckfeldt, R., M. T. Pietryka, and J. Reilly. 2014. “Noise, bias, and expertise in political communication networks.” Social Networks 36 (Jan): 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.02.003.
Javernick-Will, A. 2012. “Motivating knowledge sharing in engineering and construction organizations: Power of social motivations.” J. Manage. Eng. 28 (2): 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000076.
Korkmaz, S., and A. Singh. 2012. “Impact of team characteristics in learning sustainable built environment practices.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 138 (4): 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000107.
Kostoska, O., S. Mitikj, P. Jovanovski, and L. Kocarev. 2020. “Core-periphery structure in sectoral international trade networks: A new approach to an old theory.” PLoS One 15 (4): e0229547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229547.
Moody, J., D. McFarland, and S. Bender-deMoll. 2005. “Dynamic network visualization.” Am. J. Sociol. 110 (4): 1206–1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/421509.
Newman, M. E. J. 2005. “Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law.” Contemp. Phys. 46 (5): 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444.
Nonaka, I. 1994. “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.” Organ. Sci. 5 (1): 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14.
Ouchi, W. G. 1977. “The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control.” Administrative Sci. Q. 22 (1): 95–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391748.
Redmond, A., A. Hore, M. Alshawi, and R. West. 2012. “Exploring how information exchanges can be enhanced through cloud BIM.” Autom. Constr. 24 (Jul): 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.003.
Roger, G., U. Brian, S. Jarrett, and L. A. N. Amaral. 2005. “Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance.” Science 308 (5722): 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106340.
Rombach, P., M. A. Porter, J. H. Fowler, and P. J. Mucha. 2017. “Core-periphery structure in networks (revisited).” SIAM Rev. 59 (3): 619–646. https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1130046.
Sacks, R., C. Eastman, G. Lee, and P. Teicholz. 2018. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Simon, H. A. 1962. “The architecture of complexity.” Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 106 (6): 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_31.
Singh, V., N. Gu, and X. Wang. 2011. “A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform.” Autom. Constr. 20 (2): 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.011.
Snyder, D., and E. L. Kick. 1979. “Structural position in the world system and economic growth, 1955-1970: A multiple-network analysis of transnational interactions.” Am. J. Sociol. 84 (5): 1096–1126. https://doi.org/10.1086/226902.
Soda, G., and A. Zaheer. 2012. “A network perspective on organizational architecture: Performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization.” Strategic Manage. J. 33 (6): 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1966.
Soucek, R., and K. Moser. 2010. “Coping with information overload in email communication: Evaluation of a training intervention.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 26 (6): 1458–1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.024.
Stanton, N. 2004. “Memos, messages, forms and questionnaires.” In Mastering, 278–294. New York: Springer.
Swarup, L., S. Korkmaz, and D. Riley. 2011. “Project delivery metrics for sustainable, high-performance buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (12): 1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000379.
Verheij, H., and G. Augenbroe. 2006. “Collaborative planning of AEC projects and partnerships.” Autom. Constr. 15 (4): 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.06.011.
Wen, Q., and M. Qiang. 2016. “Coordination and knowledge sharing in construction project-based organization: A longitudinal structural equation model analysis.” Autom. Constr. 72 (Dec): 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.002.
Whittaker, S., V. Bellotti, and J. Cwizdka. 2007. “Everything through email.” In Personal information management, edited by W. Jones and J. Teevan, 167–189. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Zhang, L., J. He, and S. Zhou. 2013. “Sharing tacit knowledge for integrated project team flexibility: Case study of integrated project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (7): 795–804. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000645.
Zhao, D., A. P. McCoy, T. Bulbul, C. Fiori, and P. Nikkhoo. 2015. “Building collaborative construction skills through BIM-integrated learning environment.” Int. J. Construct. Educ. Res. 11 (2): 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2014.986251.
Zhao, D., A. P. McCoy, B. M. Kleiner, T. H. Mills, and H. Lingard. 2016. “Stakeholder perceptions of risk in construction.” Saf. Sci. 82 (Feb): 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.002.
Zhao, D., D. Simmons, and Z. Chen. 2021. “Interconnectivity in collaboration networks impacts on member belongingness.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (8): 04021078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002114.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147 • Issue 10 • October 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 27, 2020
Accepted: May 14, 2021
Published online: Jul 21, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 21, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Xin Chen, Qian Shi, Chao Xiao, Dong Zhao, Kewei Tang, Unveiling and Evaluating the Collaboration in Engineering Projects through a Two-Layer Information Collaboration Network Model, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5871, 40, 3, (2024).
- Meltem Duva, Dong Zhao, Kenneth A. Frank, Sinem Mollaoglu, Interaction between Project- and Group-Level Knowledge Transfer in Project Team Networks: A Social Influence Analysis, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5718, 40, 2, (2024).
- Meltem Duva, Sinem Mollaoglu, Dong Zhao, Kenneth A. Frank, A Framework for Social Network Interventions in AEC Teams: Strategies and Implications, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13475, 150, 2, (2024).
- Hasan Gokberk Bayhan, Sinem Mollaoglu, Kenneth A. Frank, Line of Privity’s Effect on Project Performance: A Case Study, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485286.069, (691-700), (2024).
- Meltem Duva, Kenneth A. Frank, Sinem Mollaoglu, Dong Zhao, Angelo Joseph Garcia, Evaluating the Impact of Micro-Level Changes on Macro-Level Network Structures in AEC Project Teams, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485286.066, (661-670), (2024).
- Zilun Wang, Qinghua He, Giorgio Locatelli, Ge Wang, Yang Li, Exploring Environmental Collaboration and Greenwashing in Construction Projects: Integrative Governance Framework, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13543, 149, 11, (2023).
- Arpit Singh, Ashish Dwivedi, Dindayal Agrawal, Durgesh Singh, Identifying issues in adoption of AI practices in construction supply chains: towards managing sustainability, Operations Management Research, 10.1007/s12063-022-00344-x, (2023).
- Meltem Duva, Sinem Mollaoglu, Dong Zhao, Kenneth A. Frank, Network Topologies and Team Performance: A Comparative Study of AEC Projects, Construction Research Congress 2022, 10.1061/9780784483978.108, (1062-1071), (2022).
- Meltem Duva, Dong Zhao, Sinem Mollaoglu, Kenneth A. Frank, Knowledge Exchanges in Complex Project Networks: Influence Model, Construction Research Congress 2022, 10.1061/9780784483978.107, (1055-1061), (2022).
- Hong Xue, Tao Sun, Junwei Zheng, Organizational Elements and Collaborative Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Off-Site Construction Projects: Configurational Approach, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002379, 148, 10, (2022).
- See more