Technical Papers
Jul 21, 2021

Network Theory–Driven Construction Logic Knowledge Network: Process Modeling and Application in Highway Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Determining a reasonable project duration is one of the most critical activities required by project owner agencies for successful project letting and delivery. Most owner agencies, specifically in the highway sector, mainly rely on schedulers’ judgment and experience in determining the sequence of construction activities to estimate the required amount of time of a project. A vast amount of historical project performance data available in owner agencies’ databases provide rich and reliable resources that can significantly improve the current process to produce a consistent and repeatable quality of construction logic determination. This study proposes a novel data-driven process model utilizing pattern mining, statistical analysis, and network analysis techniques that can detect pairwise logical relationships among construction activities (e.g., Start-Start and Finish-Start) and develop knowledge networks of as-built construction sequence patterns to improve the scheduling process. Three algorithms are proposed to apply the knowledge networks to sequencing a new project: finding immediate predecessors and successors of an activity or ordering a given set of activities. Ten years of historical project data obtained from a state department of transportation were used in this research. A case study reveals that the process model developed in this study can successfully build the most reasonable construction sequences of a highway project, which can significantly improve the scheduling and contract time determination process.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments. Some models or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge that the Montana DOT provided the daily work reports data for this study.

References

Abdel-Raheem, M., C. Torres Cantu, and X. Wang. 2020. “Dynamic contract time determination system for highway projects.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (5): 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120915896.
ADOT (Arizona DOT). 2015. Chap. 8 in Estimating contract time. ADOT: Phoenix.
Alikhani, H., C. Le, and H. D. Jeong. 2020. “Deep learning algorithms to generate activity sequences using historical as-built schedule data.” In Proc., Creative Construction e-Conf. 2020, 2–6. Budapest, Hungary: Budapest Univ. of Technology and Economics.
Bruce, R. D., D. K. Slattery, K. T. Slattery, and D. McCandless. 2012. “An expert systems approach to highway construction scheduling.” Technol. Interface Int. J. 13 (1): 21–28.
Carson, C., P. Oakander, and C. Relyca. 2014. CPM scheduling for construction—Best practices and guidelines. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
CDOT (Colorado Department of Transportation). 2019. Construction manual—Sec. 100: General provisions. Denver: CDOT.
Cherneff, J., R. Logcher, and D. Sriram. 1991. “Integrating CAD with construction-schedule generation.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 5 (1): 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1991)5:1(64).
Chevallier, N. J., and A. D. Russell. 2001. “Developing a draft schedule using templates and rules.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (5): 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:5(391).
Chua, D. K. H., T. Q. Nguyen, and K. W. Yeoh. 2013. “Automated construction sequencing and scheduling from functional requirements.” Autom. Constr. 35 (Nov): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.03.002.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2002. FHWA guide for construction contract time determination procedures. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fischer, M. A., and F. Aalami. 1996. “Scheduling with computer-interpretable construction method models.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 122 (4): 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:4(337).
Florez, L. 2017. “Crew allocation system for the masonry industry.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 32 (10): 874–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12301.
Fournier-Viger, P., J. C.-W. Lin, R. U. Kiran, Y. S. Koh, and R. Thomas. 2017. “A survey of sequential pattern mining.” Data Sci. Pattern Recognit. 1 (1): 54–77.
Hagberg, A., P. Swart, and D. S. Chult. 2008. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Hancher, D. E., W. McFarland, and R. T. Alabay. 1992. Construction contract time determination. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ. System.
Hinze, J. 2012. Construction planning and scheduling. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hu, D., and Y. Mohamed. 2014. “A dynamic programming solution to automate fabrication sequencing of industrial construction components.” Autom. Constr. 40 (Apr): 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.013.
Idaho DOT (Idaho Department of Transportation). 2011. Contract time determination in project development. Boise, ID: Idaho DOT.
IDOT (Illinois Department of Transportation). 2017. “Contract processing.” Chap. 66 in Bureau of design and environment manual. Springfield, IL: IDOT.
Jang, Y., I.-B. Jeong, Y. K. Cho, and Y. Ahn. 2019. “Predicting business failure of construction contractors using long short-term memory recurrent neural network.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (11): 04019067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001709.
Jeong, H. D., C. Le, and V. Devaguptapu. 2019. Effective production rate estimation using construction daily work report data. Helena, MT: Montana DOT.
Jeong, H. S., S. Atreya, G. D. Oberlender, and B. Chung. 2009. “Automated contract time determination system for highway projects.” Autom. Constr. 18 (7): 957–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.04.004.
Le, C., and H. D. Jeong. 2020a. “Artificial intelligence framework for developing a critical path schedule using historical daily work report data.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts, 565–573. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Le, C., and H. D. Jeong. 2020b. “A daily work report based approach for schedule risk analysis.” In Proc., CIGOS 2019, Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure, 1131–1136. New York: Springer.
Le, C., H. D. Jeong, T. Le, and Y. Kang. 2020. “Evaluating contractors’ production performance in highway projects using historical daily work report data.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (3): 04020015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000764.
Lim, T.-K., C.-Y. Yi, D.-E. Lee, and D. Arditi. 2014. “Concurrent construction scheduling simulation algorithm.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 29 (6): 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12073.
Liu, H., M. Al-Hussein, and M. Lu. 2015. “BIM-based integrated approach for detailed construction scheduling under resource constraints.” Autom. Constr. 53 (May): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.008.
MassDOT (Massachusetts Department of Transportation). 2014. Construction contract time determination guidelines for designers/planners. Boston: MassDOT.
McCrary, S. W., M. Corley, D. A. Leslie, and S. Aparajithan. 1995. Evaluation of contract time estimation and contracting procedures for Louisiana department of transportation and development construction projects. Ruston, LA: Louisiana Tech Univ., Dept. of Civil Engineering.
Mooney, C. H., and J. F. Roddick. 2013. “Sequential pattern mining—Approaches and algorithms.” ACM Comput. Surv. 45 (2): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2431211.2431218.
Mubarak, S. A. 2015. Construction project scheduling and control. New York: Wiley.
NCDOT (North Carolina Department of Transportation). n.d. Guidelines for determining contract time. Raleigh, NC: NCDOT.
Newitt, J. S. 2009. Construction scheduling: Principles and practices. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ott, R. L., and M. Longnecker. 2015. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Boston: Cengage.
Shrestha, K. J., and H. D. Jeong. 2017. “Computational algorithm to automate as-built schedule development using digital daily work reports.” Autom. Constr. 84 (Dec): 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.008.
Shrestha, K. J., C. Le, H. D. Jeong, and T. Le. 2019. “Mining daily work report data for detecting patterns of construction sequences.” In Proc., Creative Construction Conf. 2019, 578–583. Budapest, Hungary: Budapest Univ. of Technology and Economics.
Tao, S., C. Wu, S. Hu, and F. Xu. 2020. “Construction project scheduling under workspace interference.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 35 (9): 923–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12547.
Taylor, T. R. B., R. E. Sturgill, and Y. Li. 2017. Practices for establishing contract completion dates for highway projects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2018. Contract time determination guidance. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
Wang, Y., and Z. Yuan. 2017. “Research on BIM-based assembly sequence planning of prefabricated buildings.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Construction and Real Estate Management 2017 (ICCREM 2017), 10–17. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Werkmeister, R. F., B. L. Luscher, and D. E. Hancher. 2000. “Kentucky contract time determination system.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1712 (1): 185–195. https://doi.org/10.3141/1712-22.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Dec 31, 2020
Accepted: Apr 30, 2021
Published online: Jul 21, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 21, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Multidisciplinary Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2582-2671. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Construction Science, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-1869. Email: [email protected]
Ivan Damnjanovic, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Process Mining, Modeling, and Management in Construction: A Critical Review of Three Decades of Research Coupled with a Current Industry Perspective, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14727, 150, 11, (2024).
  • Determining Highway Project Contract Time from Project Duration Estimates, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-957, 15, 3, (2023).
  • Cost-Weighted TF-IDF: A Novel Approach for Measuring Highway Project Similarity Based on Pay Items’ Cost Composition and Term Frequency, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13023, 149, 8, (2023).
  • Evaluation Method of Highway Plant Slope Based on Rough Set Theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study in Taihang Mountain, Hebei, China, Mathematics, 10.3390/math10081264, 10, 8, (1264), (2022).
  • Labor resource allocation under extremely short construction period based on the inverse optimization method, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10.1108/ECAM-06-2022-0604, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share