Technical Papers
Jun 3, 2022

Vehicular Impact Resistance of FRP-Strengthened RC Bridge Pier

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 8

Abstract

As-built bridge piers are likely to be subjected to vehicular collisions, causing severe damage to the bridge substructure and even resulting in the collapse of the entire bridge. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) strengthening in enhancing the vehicular impact resistance of as-built bridge piers. A typical local, refined finite-element (FE) model of a simply supported two-span, double-column, reinforced-concrete (RC) bridge was established. The adopted material constitutive models and the FE analytical approaches were then validated through reduced vehicle model lateral impact tests on bare and carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP)-strengthened RC columns. The effective schemes for FRP strengthening of bridge piers against vehicle impact are discussed from the aspects of fiber orientation, number of layers, and strengthened height as well as by FRP type. Based on the FRP strengthening scheme, 48 vehicle–bridge collision scenarios were designed to evaluate the collapse of bridges with/without FRP-strengthened piers. It was found that (1) external FRP wrapping can effectively enhance vehicular impact-resistance of as-built bridge piers (e.g., reducing the degree of damage and deformation of the impacted pier); (2) for typical bridge piers, the effective strengthening scheme comprised a fiber orientation of 0° in reference to the circumferential direction, a 3-m strengthened height, and four-layer CFRP wrapping; (3) compared with bare bridge piers, FRP-strengthened piers could improve the vehicular impact-resistant safety redundancy of as-built bridges and, to some extent, avoid bridge collapses under truck collisions at high speed. Furthermore, through introducing the dynamic increase factors of concrete strength, reinforcement rebars, and FRP, and considering the nonuniform distributions of the strain rate of FRP-strengthened bridge piers caused by vehicular collision, the dynamic shear capacity of strengthened bridge pier was formulated.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52108474).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
A
section area of pier;
Asv
area sum of transverse rebars;
Asv1
area of single transverse rebar;
b
section width of pier;
c
strain-rate parameter for C-S model;
D
diameter of pier;
DIF
dynamic increase factor;
DIFc
DIF of concrete;
DIFcc
DIF of compressive strength of concrete;
DIFct
DIF of tensile strength of concrete;
DIFf
DIF of FRP;
DIFs
DIF of reinforcement rebar;
df
effective width of strengthened pier;
Ea
elastic modulus of FRP;
Eb
elastic modulus of FRP;
Ef
tensile modulus of elasticity of FRP;
Ep
plastic hardening modulus of rebar;
FvehP
peak vehicular impact force;
fcs
static cylindric compressive strength of concrete;
fcu,s
static cube compressive strength of concrete;
ffed
effective dynamic tensile stress of FRP;
ffes
effective static tensile stress of FRP;
ftd
dynamic tensile strength of concrete;
fts
static tensile strength of concrete;
fyvd
dynamic yield stress of transverse rebar;
fyvs
static yield stress of transverse rebar;
Gab
shear modulus of FRP;
h0
effective section height of pier;
mch
cargo weight of heavy truck;
mcm
cargo weight of medium truck;
meh
engine weight of heavy truck;
mem
engine weight of medium truck;
N
axial force applied on pier;
n
number of transverse rebars;
nf
number of FRP layers;
p
strain-rate parameter for C-S model;
Sc
longitudinal compressive stress of FRP;
s
spacing of transverse rebar;
tf
FRP thickness;
Vbd
dynamic shear capacity of bare pier;
Vbs
static shear capacity of bare pier;
Vdsc
dynamic shear capacity of bare pier;
VdscS
dynamic shear capacity of strengthened pier;
Vdsd
maximal dynamic shear demand;
Vfd
dynamic shear contribution of FRP;
Vfs
static shear contribution of FRP;
v0
impact velocity;
vab
Poisson’s ratio of FRP;
vba
Poisson’s ratio of FRP;
Xt
longitudinal tensile stress of FRP;
Yc
transverse compressive stress of FRP;
Yt
transverse tensile stress of FRP;
β
hardening parameter of rebar;
ε˙
strain rate of rebar;
ε˙cd
compressive strain rate of concrete;
ɛeff
equivalent plastic strain of rebar;
ε˙f
strain rate of FRP;
ɛfe
effective strain of FRP;
ε˙sd
strain rate of rebar;
ε˙td
tensile strain rate of concrete;
θ
fiber orientation of FRP;
κ
nonuniform distribution of the strain rate;
λ
shear-span ratio;
λc
collapse index;
σ0
static yield stress of rebar;
σy
dynamic yield stress of rebar; and
wf
FRP wrapping width.

References

AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2008. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. ACI 440.2 R-08. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Alkhatib, F., E. Mahdi, and A. Dean. 2020. “Crushing response of CFRP and KFRP composite corrugated tubes to quasistatic slipping axial loading: Experimental investigation and numerical simulation.” Compos. Struct. 246: 112370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112370.
Altair HyperWorks. 2014. Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.altair.com/customer-support.
Buth, C. E., W. F. Williams, M. S. Brackin, D. Lord, S. R. Geedipally, and A. Y. Abu-Odeh. 2010. Collision loads on bridge piers: Phase 1. Report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions. Rep. No. FHWA/TX-11/9-4973-1. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019. “Performance-based design framework for bridge piers subjected to truck collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001423.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2002. Actions on structures. Part 1-1: General actions-densities, self-weight, imposed loads for building. BS EN 1991-1-1:2002. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, L., H. Wu, and T. Liu. 2020. “Shear performance evaluation of reinforced concrete piers subjected to vehicle collision.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (4): 04020026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002571.
Chen, L., and Y. Xiao. 2012. “Review of studies on vehicle anti-collision on bridge piers.” [In Chinese.] J. Highway Transp. Res. Dev. 29 (8): 78–86.
Chen, X., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, X. Xu, R. Cao, and W. Wong. 2019. “Inelastic behavior of a bridge bent subjected to truck impact: Experimental and computational study.” Eng. Struct. 199: 109543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109543.
Consolazio, G. R., and M. T. Davidson. 2008. “Simplified dynamic analysis of barge collision for bridge design.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2050: 13–25. https://doi.org/10.3141/2050-02.
Do, T. V., T. M. Pham, and H. Hao. 2018. “Dynamic responses and failure modes of bridge columns under vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 156: 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.053.
Do, T. V., T. M. Pham, and H. Hao. 2019a. “Impact force profile and failure classification of reinforced concrete bridge columns against vehicle impact.” Eng. Struct. 183: 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.040.
Do, T. V., T. M. Pham, and H. Hao. 2019b. “Proposed design procedure for reinforced concrete bridge columns subjected to vehicle collisions.” Struct. 22: 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.08.011.
El-Tawil, S., E. Severino, and P. Fonseca. 2005. “Vehicle collision with bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (3): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:3(345).
Erki, M. A., and U. Meier. 1999. “Impact loading of concrete beams externally strengthened with CFRP laminates.” J. Compos. Constr. 3 (3): 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(117).
GB (Guobiao Standards). 2010. Code for design of concrete structures. [In Chinese.] GB 50010-2010. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development of the People’s Republic of China & General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China.
GB (Guobiao Standards). 2013. Code for design of strengthening concrete structure. [In Chinese.] GB 50367-2013. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development of the People’s Republic of China & General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China.
Gilat, A., R. K. Goldberg, and G. D. Roberts. 2002. “Experimental study of strain-rate-dependent behavior of carbon/epoxy composite.” Compos. Sci. Technol. 62 (10): 1469–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00100-8.
Han, H., F. Taheri, N. Pegg, and Y. Lu. 2007. “A numerical study on the axial crushing response of hybrid pultruded and ±45° braided tubes.” Compos. Struct. 80: 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.012.
Heng, K., R. Li, and H. Wu. 2022. “Damage assessment of simply supported double-pier bent bridge under heavy truck collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (5): 04022021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001851.
Hosseini, P., S. H. Ghasemi, M. Jalayer, and A. S. Nowak. 2019. “Performance-based reliability analysis of bridge pier subjected to vehicular collision: Extremity and failure.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 106: 104176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104176.
Jin, L., Y. Lan, R. Zhang, and X. Du. 2021. “Numerical analysis of the mechanical behavior of the impact-damaged RC beams strengthened with CFRP.” Compos. Struct. 274: 114353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114353.
Kabir, M. Z., and E. Shafei. 2009. “Analytical and numerical study of FRP retrofitted RC beams under low velocity impact.” Sci. Iran. 16 (5): 415–428.
Kimura, H., M. Itabashi, and K. Kawata. 2001. “Mechanical characterization of unidirectional CFRP thin strip and CFRP cables under quasi-static and dynamic tension.” Adv. Compos. Mater 10 (2/3): 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855101753396654.
Li, R. W., D. S. Cao, H. Wu, and D. F. Wang. 2021. “Collapse analysis and damage evaluation of typical simply supported double-pier RC bridge under truck collision.” Struct. 33: 3222–3238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.041.
Li, R. W., H. Wu, Q. T. Yang, and D. F. Wang. 2020a. “Vehicular impact resistance of seismic designed RC bridge piers.” Eng. Struct. 220: 111015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111015.
Li, R. W., D. Y. Zhou, and H. Wu. 2020b. “Experimental and numerical study on impact resistance of RC bridge piers under lateral impact loading.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 109: 104319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104319.
Li, Z. X., X. J. Zhang, and Y. C. Shi. 2020c. “Experimental study on dynamic properties of BFRP laminates used for structural strengthening under high strain rates.” Constr. Build. Mater. 258: 118731.
Liu, T., and Y. Xiao. 2017. “Impact behavior of CFRP-strip-wrapped RC beams without stirrups.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (5): 04017035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000815.
LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation). 2013. Keyword user’s manual. LSTC.
Malvar, L. J., and J. E. Crawford. 1998a. Dynamic increase factors for concrete. Hueneme, CA: Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center Port.
Malvar, L. J., and J. E. Crawford. 1998b. “Dynamic increase factors for steel reinforcing bars.” In Proc., 28th DDESB Seminar. Alexandria, VA: Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. 2011. Code for seismic design of urban bridges. [In Chinese.] CJJ 166-2011. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China.
Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. 2015. General code for design of highway bridges and culverts. [In Chinese.] JTG D60-2015. Beijing: China Communications Press.
Mohammed, T. A., and A. Parvin. 2020. “Vehicle collision impact response of bridge pier strengthened with composites.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 25 (4): 04020027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000510.
Nanjing Hitech Composites. 2021. Accessed November 1, 2021. http://cn.hitechfrp.com/.
NCAC. 2010. “Finite element model archive.” Accessed December 1, 2012. http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html.
Pham, T. M., and H. Hao. 2016. “Impact behavior of FRP-strengthened RC beams without stirrups.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (4): 04016011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000671.
Promis, G., E. Ferrier, and P. Hamelin. 2009. “Effect of external FRP retrofitting on reinforced concrete short columns for seismic strengthening.” Compos. Struct. 88: 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.04.019.
Shin, M., and B. Andrawes. 2011. “Lateral cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete columns retrofitted with shape memory spirals and FRP wraps.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (11): 1282–1290. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000364.
Soleimani, S. M., N. Banthia, and S. Mindess. 2007. “Sprayed GFRP shear-strengthened reinforced concrete beams under impact loading.” In Advances in Construction Materials, edited by C. U. Grosse, 279–286. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Symonds, P. S. 1967. Survey of methods of analysis for plastic deformation of structures under dynamic loading. Rep. No. BU/NSRDC/1-67. Providence, RI: Brown Univ. School of Engineering.
Tang, T., and H. Saadatmanesh. 2003. “Behavior of concrete beams strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymer laminates under impact loading.” J. Compos. Constr. 7 (3): 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:3(209).
Teng, J. G., J. F. Chen, S. T. Smith, and L. Lam. 2002. FRP: Strengthened RC structures, 31–46. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
Xu, J. J., C. Demartino, B. Shan, Y. A. Heo, and Y. Xiao. 2020. “Experimental investigation on performance of cantilever CFRP-wrapped circular RC columns under lateral low-velocity impact.” Compos. Struct. 242: 112143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112143.
Zhang, X., and H. Hao. 2019. “Improved impact resistant capacity of segmental column with fibre reinforced polymer wrap.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 125: 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.11.009.
Zhou, S. C., C. Demartino, J. J. Xu, and Y. Xiao. 2021. “Effectiveness of CFRP seismic-retrofit of circular RC bridge piers under vehicular lateral impact loading.” Eng. Struct. 243: 112602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112602.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 8August 2022

History

Received: Dec 29, 2021
Accepted: Mar 24, 2022
Published online: Jun 3, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 3, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an Univ. of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an Univ. of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Disaster Mitigation for Structures, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8629-2053. Email: [email protected]
Pengcheng Jia [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an Univ. of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Effectiveness of CFRP shear-strengthening on vehicular impact resistance of double-column RC bridge pier, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114604, 266, (114604), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share