TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 15, 2002

Representing Work Spaces Generically in Construction Method Models

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 128, Issue 4

Abstract

Construction activities require a set of work spaces to be executed safely and productively. The locations and volumes of these spaces change in three dimensions and across time, according to project-specific design and schedule information. Previous research on construction space management requires users to specify the spatio-temporal data necessary to represent each project-specific space needed for construction. Since a construction schedule consists of hundreds of activities requiring multiple types of spaces, this approach is practically infeasible. There is a need for a generic (project-independent) representation of work spaces, from which the project-specific instances of spaces can be derived automatically based on project-specific design and construction schedule information. This paper formalizes such a generic space description as a computer-interpretable ontology. This ontology is general, reusable, and comprehensive. A prototype system developed uses this ontology to capture the spatial requirements associated with construction methods and to automate the generation of project-specific spaces represented in three dimensions and across time.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aalami, F. (1998). “Using method models to generate 4D production models.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Akinci, B. (2000). “Automatic generation of work spaces and analysis of time-space conflicts at construction sites.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Akinci, B., and Fischer, M. (1998). “Time-space conflict analysis based on 4D production models.” Conf. on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, Va., 342–353.
Akinci, B., and Fischer, M. (2000a). “An automated approach for accounting for spaces required by construction activities.” Construction Congress VI, ASCE, Reston, Va., 1–10.
Akinci, B., and Fischer, M. (2000b). “4D WorkPlanner—A prototype system for automated generation of construction spaces and analysis of time-space conflicts.” Proc., 8th ICCBE, 740–747.
Akinci, B., Fischer, M., and Zabelle, T. (1998). “A proactive approach for reducing non value adding activities due to time-space conflicts.” IGLC-6, 1–18.
Allen, J.(1983). “Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals.” Commun. ACM, 26(11), 832–843.
Ballard, G. (1997). “Lookahead planning: The missing link in production control.” Proc., 5th Conf. of Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-5), 〈http://web.bham.ac.uk/d.j.crook/lean/iglc5/bal/ballard.htm〉.
Choi, B., and Flemming, U. (1996). “Adaptation of a layout design system to a new domain: Construction site layouts.” Conf. on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, New York, 711–717.
Choo, H. Y., and Tommelein, I. (1999). “Space scheduling using flow analysis.” Proc., IGLC-7, International Group for Lean Construction, 299–311.
Claus, B., et al. (1998). “Reference space for spatial inference in text understanding.” Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge, C. Freksa, C. Habel, and K. Wender, eds., Springer, Berlin, 241–266.
Clementini, E., Di Felice, P., and Hernandez, D.(1997). “Qualitative representation of positional information.” Artif. Intel., 95, 317–356.
Darwiche, A., Levitt, R., and Hayes-Roth, B.(1988). “OARPLAN: Generating project plans by reasoning about objects, actions and resources.” AI EDAM, 2(3), 169–181.
Egenhofer, M., and Franzosa, R.(1991). “Point-set topological spatial relations.” Int. J. Geographical Information Systems, 5(2), 161–174.
Fowler, M., and Scott, K. (1999). UML distilled, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Freksa, C., Habel, C., and Wender, K. (1998). Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge, Springer, Berlin.
Froese, T., and Rankin, J. (1998). “Representation of construction methods in total project systems.” Int. Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, Va., 395–406.
Halpin, D., and Riggs, L. (1992). Planning and analysis of construction operations, Wiley, New York.
Hegazy, T., and Elbeltagi, E.(1999). “EvoSite: Evolution-based model for site layout planning.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 13(3), 198–206.
Hernandez, D. (1994). Qualitative representation of spatial knowledge, Springer, Berlin.
Hetrick, M., and Khayyal, S. A. (1987). “An integrated facility construction process model.” Tech. Rep. No. 5, CIC Research Program, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
Howell, G., and Ballard, G. (1995). “Factors affecting project success in the piping function.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Lean Construction.
Industry Alliance for Interoperability (IAI). (1998). “Industry foundation classes 2.0.” Specifications volumes 1–4, Washington, D.C.
Jägbeck, A.(1994). “MDA planner: Interactive planning tool using product models and construction methods.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 8(4), 536–554.
Martinez, J. (1996). “STROBOSCOPE: State and resource based simulation of construction processes.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., 〈http://strobos.ce.vt.edu/〉.
Mukerjee, A. (1998). “Neat vs. scruffy: A survey of computational models for spatial expressions.” Computational representation and processing of spatial expressions, P. Olivier and K.-P. Gapp, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 〈http://www.cs.albany.edu/∼amit/review.html〉.
O’Brien, W. (1998). “Capacity costing approaches for construction supply-chain management.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
O’Brien, W., Fischer, M., and Akinci, B. (1997). “Importance of site conditions and capacity allocation for construction cost and performances: A case study.” Int. Conf. on Lean Construction, 77–89.
Oglesby, C. H., Parker, H. W., and Howell, G. A. (1989). Productivity improvement in construction, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Rad, P. (1980). “Analysis of working space congestion from scheduling data.” AACE Transactions, American Association of Cost Engineers, Morgantown, W.Va., F4.1–F4.5.
Riley, D. (1994). “Modeling the space behavior of construction activities.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
Riley, D. (1998). “4D space planning specification development for construction work spaces.” Int. Comp. Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, Va., 354–363.
Riley, D., and Sanvido, V. (1997). “Space planning for mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection trades in multistory building construction.” 5th ASCE Construction Congress, New York, 102–109.
Sanvido, V. (1984). “Designing productivity management and control systems for construction projects.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Shi, J.(1999). “Activity-based construction (ABC) modeling and simulation method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(5), 354–360.
Shi, J., and AbouRizk, S.(1997). “Resource-based modeling for construction simulation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(1), 26–33.
Stumpf, A., Ganeshan, R., Chin, S., and Liu, L.(1996). “Object-oriented model for integrating construction product and process information.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 10(3), 204–212.
Thabet, W., and Beliveau, Y.(1994). “Modeling work space to schedule repetitive floors in multistory buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(1), 96–116.
Thomas, H. R., and Sakarcan, A. S.(1994). “Forecasting labor productivity using factor model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(1), 228–239.
Tommelein, I., and Zouein, P.(1993). “Interactive dynamic layout planning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(2), 266–287.
Tommelein, I. D., Carr, R. I., and Odeh, A. M.(1994). “Assembly of simulation networks using designs, plans, and methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(4), 796–815.
Tommelein, I. D., Levitt, R. E., and Hayes-Roth, B.(1992). “Site layout modeling: How can artificial intelligence help?” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(3), 594–611.
Zouein, P., and Tommelein, I. (1994). “Time-space tradeoff strategies for space-schedule construction.” Proc., 1st Conf. on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, New York, 1180–1187.
Zouein, P., and Tommelein, I.(1999). “Dynamic layout planning using hybrid incremental solution method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(6), 400–408.
Zozaya-Gorostiza, C., Hendrickson, C., and Rehak, D. (1989). “Knowledge-based construction planning.” Proc., Construction Congress I—Excellence in the Constructed Project, 217–222.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 128Issue 4August 2002
Pages: 296 - 305

History

Received: Jul 13, 2000
Accepted: Jan 18, 2002
Published online: Jul 15, 2002
Published in print: Aug 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Burcu Akinci
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890.
Martin Fischer
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and (by Courtesy) Computer Science, Director, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305.
John Kunz
Senior Research Associate, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305.
Ray Levitt
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share