Simplified Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 125, Issue 1
Abstract
A simplified version of the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) for project planning is developed and tested. The simplification is to reduce the number of estimates required for activity durations from three, as in conventional PERT, to two. This is accomplished by applying the normal distribution, rather than the beta, to an activity duration. The two required duration estimates are the “most likely” and the “pessimistic.” These modifications reduce the level of effort needed to apply PERT. Simplified PERT durations are subject to errors of greater than 10% when the skewness of the actual distribution is greater than 0.28 or less than −0.48. In analyzing 12 project networks, though, the simplified PERT produced values similar to those of conventional PERT for activity and project durations and variances and project duration probabilities. Hence, when activity duration distributions are not highly skewed, results similar to those of conventional PERT can be obtained using the simpler technique. Two suggestions for future research are to survey practitioners on the usefulness of the simplified PERT and to find a fixed, skewed distribution that can approximate activity durations having long tails.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AbouRizk, S. M., and Halpin, D. W. (1992). “Statistical properties of construction duration data.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 118(3), 525–544.
2.
AbouRizk, S. M., and Halpin, D. W. (1994). “Fitting beta distributions based on sample data.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(2), 288–305.
3.
Anklesaria, K. P., and Drezner, Z. ( 1986). “A multivariate approach to estimating the completion time for PERT networks.” J. Operational Res. Soc., 37(8), 811–815.
4.
Badiru, A. B. ( 1991). “A simulation approach to PERT network analysis.” Simulation, 57(4), 245–255.
5.
Bandopadhyay, S., and Sundararajan, A. ( 1987). “Simulation of a longwall development—Extraction network.” CIM Bull., 80(903), 62–70.
6.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. ( 1970). Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers . McGraw-Hill, New York.
7.
Callahan, M. T., Quackenbush, D. G., and Rowings, J. E. ( 1992). Construction project scheduling. McGraw-Hill, New York.
8.
Clark, C. E. ( 1962). “The PERT model for the distribution of an activity time.” Operations Res., 10, 405–406.
9.
Crandall, K. C. (1976). “Probabilistic time scheduling.”J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 102(3), 415–423.
10.
Demenais F., Lathrop, M., and Lalouel, J. M. ( 1986). “Robustness and power of the unified model in the analysis of quantitative measurements.” Am. J. Human Genetics, 38(2), 228–234.
11.
Diaz, C. F., and Hadipriono, F. C. (1993). “Nondeterministic networking methods.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 119(1), 40–57.
12.
Dodin, B. ( 1984). “Determining the K most critical paths in PERT networks.” Operations Res., 32(4), 859–877.
13.
Fulkerson, D. R. ( 1962). “Expected critical path lengths in PERT networks.” Operations Res., 10(6), 808–817.
14.
Gallagher, C. ( 1987). “A note on PERT assumptions.” Mgmt. Sci., 33(10), 1360.
15.
Grubbs, F. E. ( 1962). “Attempts to validate certain PERT statistics or `picking on PERT.” ' Operations Res., 10(6), 912–915.
16.
Hartley, H. O., and Wortham, A. W. ( 1966). “A statistical theory for PERT critical path analysis.” Mgmt. Sci., 12(10), B469–B481.
17.
Izuchukwu, J. I. ( 1990). “Project management: Shortening the critical path.” Mech. Engrg., 112(2), 59–60.
18.
Kamburowski, J. ( 1985). “Normally distributed activity durations in PERT networks.” J. Operational Res. Soc., 36(11), 1051–1057.
19.
Lau, A. H.-L., Lau, H.-S., and Zhang, Y. ( 1996). “A simple and logical alternative for making PERT time estimates.” IIE Trans., 28, 183–192.
20.
Lindsey, J. H. II. ( 1972). “An estimate of expected critical-path length in PERT networks.” Operations Res., 20(4), 800–812.
21.
Littlefield, T. K., and Randolph, P. H. ( 1987). “An answer to Sasieni's question on PERT times.” Mgmt. Sci., 33(10), 1357–1359.
22.
MacCrimmon, K. R., and Ryavec, C. A. ( 1964). “An analytical study of the PERT assumptions.” Operations Res., 12(1), 16–37.
23.
Malcolm, D. G., Roseboom, J. H., Clark, C. E., and Fazar, W. ( 1959). “Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation.” Operations Res., 11(5), 646–669.
24.
McBride W. J. Jr., and McClelland, C. W. ( 1967). “Pert and the beta distribution.” IEEE Trans. on Engrg. Mgmt., Piscataway, N.J., 14(4), 166–169.
25.
Moder, J. J., Phillips, C. R., and Davis, E. W. ( 1983). Project management with CPM, PERT and precedence diagramming, 3rd Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
26.
Moder, J. J., and Rodgers, E. G. ( 1968). “Judgement estimates of the moments of PERT type distributions.” Mgmt. Sci., 15(2), B76–B83.
27.
Perry, C., and Greig, I. D. ( 1975). “Estimating the mean and variance of subjective distributions in PERT and decision analysis.” Mgmt. Sci., 21(12), 1477–1480.
28.
Robillard, P., and Trahan, M. ( 1977). “The completion time of PERT networks.” Operations Res., 25(1), 15–29.
29.
Sasieni, M. W. ( 1986). “A note on PERT times.” Mgmt. Sci., 32(12), 1652–1653.
30.
Sculli, D. ( 1983). “The completion time of PERT networks.” J. Operational Res. Soc., 34(2), 155–158.
31.
Sculli, D., and Shum, Y. W. ( 1991). “An approximate solution to the PERT problem.” Comp. and Mathematics Applications, 21(8), 1–7.
32.
Swanson, L. A., and Pazer, H. L. ( 1971). “Implications of the underlying assumptions of PERT.” Decision Sci., 2(October), 461–480.
33.
Troutt, M. D. ( 1989). “On the generality of the PERT average time formula.” Decision Sci., 20, 410–412.
34.
Van Slyke, R. M. ( 1963). “Monte Carlo methods and the PERT problem.” Operations Res., 11(5), 839–860.
35.
Watson, C. J., Billingsley, P., Croft, D. J., and Huntsberger, D. V. ( 1993). Statistics for management and economics, 5th Ed., Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 125 • Issue 1 • January 1999
Pages: 16 - 22
History
Received: Oct 21, 1997
Published online: Jan 1, 1999
Published in print: Jan 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.