Choosing Appropriate Construction Contracting Method
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper examines the compatibility of various construction contracting methods with certain types of owners and projects. Contracting methods, as defined in this paper, consist of four parts: scope, organization, contract, and award. An owner must create an appropriate contracting method for each project. It was determined that there are six main organizations around which the contracting variations are created: general contractor, construction manager, multiple primes, design‐build, turnkey, and build‐operate‐transfer. The most common method is the traditional system of an independent designer, a general contractor, and a competitively bid, lump‐sum price. This method is efficient in many cases; however, in some situations, alternative methods are more appropriate and should be explored. Choosing certain methods can decrease the project duration, provide flexibility for changes, reduce adversarial relationships, allow for contractor participation in design, provide cost savings incentives to the contractor, and provide alternative financing methods. Guidelines are established to help the owner choose the organization, contract type, and award method most applicable for their project and themselves.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barrie, D. S., and Paulson, B. C. Jr. (1984). Professional construction management. 2nd ed., McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
2.
Bon, R., and Kazunobu, M. (1986). “The role of construction in the national economy.” Habitat International, 10.
3.
Carr, R. I. (1983). “Impact of number of bidders on competition.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 109(1).
4.
Chadwick, W. L. (1986). “Impact of design, construction and cost on project quality.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 12(2).
5.
Clough, R. H. (1981). Construction contracting. 4th ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
6.
Construction management: A state‐of‐the‐art update. (1986). ASCE, New York, N.Y.
7.
Contractor planning for fixed‐price construction. (1987). Publication 6‐4, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
8.
Contractual arrangements (Report A‐7). (1982). The Business Roundtable, New York, N.Y.
9.
“Cost vs quality: A new perspective.” (1990). Civ. Engrg., ASCE, Jan.
10.
“Facing the realities of competitive bidding.” (1983). Consulting Engr., Nov.
11.
“FHWA to experiment with creative bids.” (1991). Civ. Engrg., ASCE, Feb.
12.
Gilbreath, R. D. (1983). Managing construction contracts. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
13.
Goldhaber, S., Jha, C. K., and Macedo, M. C., Jr. (1977). Construction management: Principles and practices. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
14.
Greenfield, S. S. (1982). “Turnkey construction in the United States.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 108(2).
15.
Griffis, F. H., and Butler, F. (1988). “Case for cost‐plus contracting.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., 114(1).
16.
Herbsman, Z. J., and Ellis, R. D. (1991). “Time bid costing.” ASCE Construction Congress '91, Cambridge, Mass.
17.
Impact of various construction contract types and clauses on project performance. (1986). Publication 5‐1, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
18.
Irwig, H. G. (1980). “The architectural profession: Limits to leadership.” Arch. Sci. Review, 23, Dec.
19.
Levitt, R. E., Ashley, D. B., and Logcher, R. D. (1980). “Allocation of risk and incentive in construction.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, Sep.
20.
Macomber, J. D. (1989). “You can manage construction risk.” Harvard Business Review, Mar.–Apr.
21.
Maher, R. (1979). “Complex problems with separate contracting systems.” J. Constr. Div., 105(2).
22.
Minden, S. D. (1986). “Design‐build in the public sector: a case study of the commonwealth of Massachusetts division of capital planning and operations DCPO design‐build projects for three correctional facilities,” MSc thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
23.
“Negotiated contracting prompts legislative fight.” (1985). Engrg. News Record, Nov. 7.
24.
“Negotiated procurement.” (1985). Consulting Engr., Feb.
25.
“Owners warming up to design‐construct.” (1990). Engrg. News Record, May 24.
26.
Pasquarelli, J. J. (1984). “Comparing contracting construction methods.” Consulting Engr., Dec.
27.
“The problem with public projects.” (1987). Civ. Engrg., ASCE, Mar.
28.
“Quality can be maintained on lump‐sum construction.” (1982). Electric World, Dec.
29.
Quality in the constructed project. Volume 1. (1990). ASCE, New York, N.Y.
30.
“Rethinking the competitive bid.” (1991). Civ. Engrg., ASCE, Jan.
31.
“Searching for a better buy.” (1990). Engrg. News Record, March 15.
32.
Slatter, S. St. P. (1990). “Strategic marketing variables under conditions of competitive bidding.” Strategic Mgmt. J., 11.
33.
Tatum, C. B. (1987). “Improving constructibility during conceptual planning.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113, June.
34.
Tatum, C. B., Gans, G. M., and Harper, G. T. (1980). “Professional CM: The architect‐engineer's viewpoint.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 106(2).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120 • Issue 1 • March 1994
Pages: 196 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 18, 1992
Published online: Mar 1, 1994
Published in print: Mar 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.