Technical Papers
Dec 21, 2018

Impact of Discrepancies between Global Ocean Tide Models on Tidal Simulations in the Shinnecock Bay Area

Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 2

Abstract

Global ocean tide models have previously been reported to have substantial discrepancies in shallow coastal waters. Despite this, tidal forcing along the open boundaries of near-shore numerical hydrodynamic models is often driven by interpolating data of a global ocean tide model. This study compared tidal constants of two altimetry-constrained tide models [Ocean Topography Experiment (TOPEX)/POSEION Crossover Solution 8 (TPXO8) and Finite Element Solution 2014 (FES2014)] along the open boundary of a model in the Shinnecock Bay area of southern Long Island, New York, to investigate global ocean tide models’ discrepancies in this shallow-water location. The two tide models showed discrepancies of up to 1.18 cm in the predominant M2 tidal constituent and up to 1.69 cm in the O1 tidal constituent along the open boundary. To assess the impacts of the tide models’ discrepancies on tidal simulations, both tide models were used to force two different hydrodynamic models [Finite Volume Community Ocean Model (FVCOM) and Advanced Circulation Model (ADCIRC)]. On the basis of several performance measures, the authors conclude that tidal simulation results were affected more by the algorithm utilized rather than the choice of tide model, more so in the bay than in the open ocean.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a New York University Tandon School of Engineering (Civil and Urban Department) scholarship.

References

Carrere, L., F. Lyard, M. Cancet, and A. Guillot. 2015. “FES 2014, a new tidal model on the global ocean with enhanced accuracy in shallow seas and in the Arctic region.” In Vol. 17 of EGU General Assembly Conf. Abstracts. Vienna, Austria: EGU General Assembly.
Carrere, L., F. Lyard, M. Cancet, A. Guillot, and N. Picot. 2016. “FES 2014, a new tidal model—Validation results and perspectives for improvements.” In ESA Living Planet Conf. Prague, Czech Republic: ESA Living Planet Symposium.
Chen, C., et al. 2013. “Extratropical storm inundation testbed: Intermodel comparisons in Scituate, Massachusetts.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118 (10): 5054–5073. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20397.
Chen, C., H. Liu, and R. C. Beardsley. 2003. “An unstructured grid, finite-volume, three-dimensional, primitive equations ocean model: Application to coastal ocean and estuaries.” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 20 (1): 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020%3C0159:AUGFVT%3E2.0.CO;2.
Cialone, M. A., A. S. Grzegorzewski, D. J. Mark, M. A. Bryant, and T. C. Massey. 2017. “Coastal-storm model development and water-level validation for the North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 143 (5): 04017031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000408.
Egbert, G. D., and S. Y. Erofeeva. 2002. “Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides.” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 19 (2): 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019%3C0183:EIMOBO%3E2.0.CO;2.
Egbert, G. D., S. Y. Erofeeva, and R. D. Ray. 2010. “Assimilation of altimetry data for nonlinear shallow-water tides: Quarter-diurnal tides of the Northwest European Shelf.” Cont. Shelf Res. 30 (6): 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2009.10.011.
Erofeeva, G., and L. Egbert. 2014. “TPXO8 atlas.” Accessed April 30, 2018. http://volkov.oce.orst.edu/tides/tpxo8_atlas.html.
ESR (Earth and Space Research). 2018. “TMD MATLAB toolbox.” Accessed May 8, 2018. https://www.esr.org/research/polar-tide-models/tmd-software/.
Fleming, J. G. 2005. “Shinnecock Inlet, NY with tidal forcing results.” ADCIRC. Accessed March 1, 2018. http://adcirc.org/home/documentation/example-problems/shinnecock-inlet-ny-with-tidal-forcing-example/shinnecock-inlet-ny-with-tidal-forcing-results.
Gao, G., C. Chen, J. Qi, and R. C. Beardsley. 2011. “An unstructured-grid, finite-volume sea ice model: Development, validation, and application.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 116 (C8): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006688.
Hicks, S. 2006. Understanding tides. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service.
Ji, R., C. Davis, C. Chen, and R. Beardsley. 2008. “Influence of local and external processes on the annual nitrogen cycle and primary productivity on Georges Bank: A 3-D biological–physical modeling study.” J. Mar. Syst. 73 (1–2): 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.08.002.
Lefèvre, F., C. Le Provost, and F. H. Lyard. 2000. “How can we improve a global ocean tide model at a regional scale? A test on the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 105 (C4): 8707–8725. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900281.
Luettich, R. A., and J. J. Westerink. 2004. “Formulation and numerical implementation of the 2D/3D ADCIRC finite element model version 44.XX.” Accessed March 31, 2018. https://adcirc.org/files/2018/11/adcirc_theory_2004_12_08.pdf.
Luettich, R. A., and J. J. Westerink. 2016. “ADCIRC user’s manual—Version 52.” Accessed April 30, 2018. http://adcirc.org/home/documentation/users-manual-v52/.
Militello, A., and N. C. Kraus. 2001. Shinnecock Inlet, NY, site investigation. Report 4: Evaluation of flood and ebb shoal sediment source alternatives for the West of Shinnecock Interim Project, NY. Rep. ERDC/CHL-TR-98-32. Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Lab.
Morang, A. 1999. Shinnecock Inlet, NY, site investigation. Report 1: Morphology and historical behavior. Rep. WES-CHL-98-32. Vicksburg, MS: Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Niedoroda, A., D. Resio, G. Toro, D. Divoky, H. Das, and C. Reed. 2010. “Analysis of the coastal Mississippi storm surge hazard.” Ocean Eng. 37 (1): 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.08.019.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2018a. “NOAA harmonic constituents for 8512354, Shinnecock Inlet open coast NY.” Accessed March 31, 2017. https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/harcon.html?unit=0&timezone=0&id=8512354&name=SHINNECOCK+INLET+OPEN+COAST&state=NY.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2018b. “NOAA tide predictions for 8512354, Shinnecock Inlet open coast NY.” Accessed March 31, 2017. https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/noaatidepredictions.html?id=8512354&units=metric&bdate=20131001&edate=20131031&timezone=GMT&clock=24hour&datum=MSL&interval=h&action=data.
Parker, B. B. 2007. Tidal analysis and prediction. Rep. NOS CO-OPS 3. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admistration, Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services.
Pawlowicz, R., B. Beardsley, and S. Lentz. 2002. “Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using T_TIDE.” Comput. Geosci. 28 (8): 929–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(02)00013-4.
Ralston, D. K., W. R. Geyer, P. A. Traykovski, and N. J. Nidzieko. 2013. “Effects of estuarine and fluvial processes on sediment transport over deltaic tidal flats.” Cont. Shelf Res. 60: S40–S57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.02.004.
Shi, L., K. W. Hess, and E. P. Myers. 2013. “Spatial interpolation of tidal data using a multiple-order harmonic equation for unstructured grids.” Int. J. Geosci. 4 (10): 1425–1437. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.410140.
Shriver, J. F., B. K. Arbic, J. G. Richman, R. D. Ray, E. J. Metzger, A. J. Wallcraft, and P. G. Timko. 2012. “An evaluation of the barotropic and internal tides in a high-resolution global ocean circulation model.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 117 (C10): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008170.
Shum, C. K., et al. 1997. “Accuracy assessment of recent ocean tide models.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 102 (C11): 25173–25194. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00445.
Stammer, D., et al. 2014. “Accuracy assessment of global barotropic ocean tide models.” Rev. Geophys. 52 (3): 243–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000450.
Wang, X., Y. Chao, C. K. Shum, Y. Yi, and H. S. Fok. 2012. “Comparison of two methods to assess ocean tide models.” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 29 (8): 1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00166.1.
Williams, G. L., A. Morang, and L. Lillycrop. 1998. Shinnecock Inlet, NY, site investigation. Report 2: Evaluation of sand bypass options. Rep. WES-CHL-98-32. Vicksburg, MS: Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 145Issue 2March 2019

History

Received: Mar 5, 2018
Accepted: Aug 3, 2018
Published online: Dec 21, 2018
Published in print: Mar 1, 2019
Discussion open until: May 21, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jeong Eun Ahn [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York Univ., Brooklyn, NY 11201 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Anne Dudek Ronan, Ph.D., M.ASCE
P.E.
Industry Professor, Dept. of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York Univ., Brooklyn, NY 11201.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share